Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pstr Manning: Ethic Violation if Disbarred Obama allowed to Appoint Supreme Court Justices
Atlah Ministries You Tube ^ | 4-13-10 | atlah Ministries

Posted on 04/13/2010 4:56:17 PM PDT by howkn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
http://www.youtube.com/user/ATLAHWorldwide#p/u/1/R0ed8QrGKtE
1 posted on 04/13/2010 4:56:17 PM PDT by howkn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: howkn
Did you know that BH The Long Legged Mack Daddy O has had his Law License taken away from him. His license to practice Law by the IL State Bar has been taken away from him. And he surrendered that license during the heat of the Primary with HIllary and Bill Clinton because they had discovered that he had LIED on his application to the IL State Bar regarding whether or not he used another name other than Barrack Hussein Obama, he stated, “NO”. But the world knows that he used and had been known by the name, ‘Barry Soetero’. Indeed, that was his legal name as he was adopted by Lolo Soetero when he lived in Jakarta, Indonesia.
2 posted on 04/13/2010 4:57:01 PM PDT by howkn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: howkn

But here’s what I want you to know. Why is it America, America, Why are you people allowing Barack Hussein (the long-legged-mack-daddy) Obama, appoint people to the US Supreme Court, when he himself is in violation of the State Bar and has lost his license to practice law? And the Same thing with his wife, Michelle The Fist Bumper who lost her license to practice law. We have 2 ex lawyers living in the Whitehouse, husband and wife, both of them leaders of our nation.


3 posted on 04/13/2010 4:57:49 PM PDT by howkn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: howkn

In a perfect world this would be the start of drawing up articles of impeachment


4 posted on 04/13/2010 4:59:12 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom sarc ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: howkn
Why are you people allowing Barack Hussein (the long-legged-mack-daddy) Obama, appoint people to the US Supreme Court, when he himself is in violation of the State Bar and has lost his license to practice law?

Whether we hate Obama or not .....

1. The U.S. Constitution gives that right to POTUS.

2. Federal laws trumps any State law.

5 posted on 04/13/2010 5:00:32 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: howkn

Despite all of this wildman’s claims, this is a very interesting point. Nothing will become of it because of the lack of a legal claim. However, it is an interesting ethical and moral point.


6 posted on 04/13/2010 5:01:26 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: howkn
Manning: "To be fair, you don't have to be an attorney to be the POTUS, that is obvious. Nor do you have to be an attorney...to appoint people to the US Supreme Court. But some how or another, the ethics of the matter ought to be reviewed into this process and one should ask the question, Jeff Session, Lindsey Graham or John Kyle, those who are on the Judiciary committee ought to raise the question about Obama’s efficacy or his legitimacy to appoint somebody to The United Supreme Court, when he himself can't even practice law EVER AGAIN."
7 posted on 04/13/2010 5:06:23 PM PDT by howkn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad
Manning: "Obama can't practice law EVER again. Now here, as we know, Bill Clinton had his law license lifted as well for Lying to Congress about the Monica Lewinski matter. Y'all remeber that. They lifted his license for lying. Well, Obama's license has been lifted for lying as well...My friends, you see how deep and ugly this thing has gotten by allowing This long-legged-mack-daddy Obama to be the POTUS?"
8 posted on 04/13/2010 5:13:04 PM PDT by howkn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: howkn

Even more to the point, you do not have to be an attorney to be appointed to the Supreme Court.

Actually, your argument is wrong. The fact that he is the President gives him the legal right to nominate Justices. The agrument should be that he has not proven himself ELIGABLE to be President.


9 posted on 04/13/2010 5:16:59 PM PDT by irishtenor (Tag line is on vacation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: irishtenor
A far, far greater number of lawyers have "lost their licenses" due to nonpayment of annual fees to the bar than have "lost their licenses" for being bad lawyers.

I handled a case involving a revenue deficiency involving a state court licensing office because they were mailing renewal notices to old addresses ~ without running an address correction file first to correct their mailing lists.

That involved THOUSANDS of lawyers who weren't getting their renewal notices in time to pay the fees in a timely manner.

That was just one state.

10 posted on 04/13/2010 5:22:08 PM PDT by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
Manning:

WE'VE GOT A DISPARRED LAWYER WHO IS THE DEFACTO HEAD, ExOfficio of the Supreme Court. WAKE UP AMERICA!

America, Come On! We've got a Disbarred Lawyer who is the Ex=Officio of the US Supreme Court, in Barack Obama.

11 posted on 04/13/2010 5:22:20 PM PDT by howkn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

Only Constitutional Federal laws trump state laws to the contrary.


12 posted on 04/13/2010 5:22:37 PM PDT by Clump (the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: howkn

The position take is silly. Being a member of the bar is not a requirement for the Presidency. (Thank goodness—it would be better if being a member of the bar disqualified one from elective office.)


13 posted on 04/13/2010 5:30:03 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irishtenor
The argument is both. The eligibility stands and continues to need a full court press so that Obaminc is unable to see straight with so many lawsuits coming at them, from every angle imaginable.

The Disbarred Lawyer ethics violation stands as well.

Talk about hypocrisy. Obama LIES on his Law License application and get disbarred for it. FACT

He's a hypocrite to appoint Untied States Supreme Court Justices when he has been disbarred from the State of IL from practicing law. In addition, he can NEVER practice law again. Like his judgment to appoint a life long member means anything. He's a liar and should be shamed by Congress for acting as if he knows ANYTHING about law. He obviously doesn't.

He is a loser to think he could have gotten away with all the lies. That's on him. No matter who convinced him to run, he should have been straight with himself and said, Yo, I've committed to many crimes and they will eventually come out. I have no business running for President. That's on him. He knew the chance he was taking with this country when he decided to run with such a shady background.

14 posted on 04/13/2010 5:30:24 PM PDT by howkn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: howkn; All

Look, I can’t stand the Obamas either, but neither one of them has been disbarred. Both chose to go inactive and therefore can’t practice law in Illinois.

See:
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=105998

There are enough real and significant reasons to go after Obama that trumping up conspiracy theories just makes us look like the wingnuts the left thinks we are.


15 posted on 04/13/2010 5:37:58 PM PDT by cammie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cammie

If Obam ‘chose’ to go inactive it’s because he committed fraud. Clinton’s discovered it during the Primaries. And if the Clinton’s discovered it, you have to know other’s have the details. Obam was disbarred for lying on the Application which is grounds for disbarment.


16 posted on 04/13/2010 5:47:11 PM PDT by howkn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cammie

No one is trumping up theories. Manning says he knows Obama lied on his Bar application, the Clinton’s found out and that’s why Obama gave up his license during the Primaries.

Maybe Manning will give greater insight during the upcoming trial. Obama is unfit to be choosing Justice’s when he himself lost his license do to lying on his application.

All reasons which chip away at Obma are significant as they paint a clear picture of Ob’s shady background and reveals why he should resign. Oba should resign to help our nation. He has messed up our country and he knew good and well he never should have ran due to his ineligibility as well as all the crimes he has committed.


17 posted on 04/13/2010 6:00:01 PM PDT by howkn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: howkn

m


18 posted on 04/13/2010 6:06:42 PM PDT by phockthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phockthis

n


19 posted on 04/13/2010 6:06:59 PM PDT by howkn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

As much as I enjoy listening to Rev. Manning’s addresses, the USC gave that power to the POTUS long before the “Bar” association was founded. Disbarment does not take that power away from the POTUS.


20 posted on 04/13/2010 6:07:57 PM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson