Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Governor Bob McDonnell Signs VA Restaurant Carry into Law
NRA-ILA ^ | 4/14/2010 | NRA-ILA

Posted on 04/14/2010 8:14:29 AM PDT by P8riot

Governor Bob McDonnell Signs VA Restaurant Carry into Law

 

Fairfax, Va. - Governor Bob McDonnell has signed into law a NRA-backed measure allowing right-to-carry permit holders to carry a concealed firearm for self-defense in restaurants, providing they do not consume alcohol.  State Senator Emmett Hanger (R-24) and Delegate Todd Gilbert (R-15) were the principal sponsors of Senate Bill 334/House Bill 505.

 

“This is a victory for self-defense in Virginia," said Chris W. Cox, executive director of the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action. “As headlines remind us, violent crime can happen anywhere. Law-abiding Virginia residents now have the option to carry a firearm in restaurants to defend themselves and their loved ones.”

 

The measure passed the State Senate in February by a margin of 22-18 and passed the House of Delegates in early March with a vote of 72-27. Virginia is the 42nd state to extend self-defense rights to permit holders in restaurants.

 

“The right to self-defense and the protection of loved ones in and outside the home is vital. We are pleased that Virginia passed these laws to enhance the self-defense rights of law-abiding folks in the Commonwealth,” concluded Cox. “The NRA would like to thank Governor Bob McDonnell and the lead bill sponsors, Senator Emmett Hanger and Delegate Todd Gilbert, as well as all the other legislators who supported this common-sense measure.” 

 

This law will take effect July 1, 2010.

 

In addition, Governor McDonnell has also signed the following pro-gun bills into law:

House Bill 8/Senate Bill 3, sponsored by State Senator Ralph Smith (R-22) and Delegate Charles Carrico (R-5), allows Virginia residents to renew concealed carry permits by mail.

House Bill 109, sponsored by Delegate Mark Cole (R-88), repeals the statute which allows the governing body of any county to require the sellers of pistols and revolvers to furnish the Clerk of the Circuit Court with the name and address of the purchaser, date of purchase and the number, make, and caliber of the gun.

House Bill 871, authored by Delegate Ben Cline (R-24), clarifies that a person who is applying for a concealed handgun permit for the first time has the same right to an ore tenus (verbal or oral statements) hearing if the permit is denied as a person who has previously held a concealed handgun permit.

House Bill 1092, sponsored by Delegate Anne B. Crockett-Stark (R-6), gives retired law-enforcement the ability to carry a concealed handgun without a permit.

House Bill 1191, sponsored by Delegate H. Morgan Griffith (R-8), allows a circuit court judge to authorize the Clerk of Court to issue concealed handgun permits in instances where the application is complete, the background check does not indicate that the applicant is disqualified, and, after consulting with the local sheriff or police department, there are no other questions or issues surrounding the application.

Virginians can thank Governor Bob McDonnell for his Second Amendment support at (804) 786-2211 or click here to thank him via email.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: alcohol; banglist; billsigning; mcdonnell; vageneralassembly; vcdl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: BCR #226
ALL of the credit for this achievement goes to VCDL who fought every step of the way for this.

You're going to have to understand the NRA was able to pass this. Politicians count the number of phone calls and letters they get and that's what convinces them to vote one way or another. As good as the VCDL might be, they don't have the numbers or for that matter, the dollars.

How much money did the VCDL spend on lobbying?

41 posted on 04/14/2010 6:21:12 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

VCDL did all of the leg work. NRA sent out only a few letters. For the past 14 years, the NRA lobbiest in Richmond spoke out AGAINST repeal of the ban. Now, it passes and NRA hogs the credit where it is NOT appropriate.

As many here know, I have some issues with VCDL but I will give credit where credit is due. VCDL is why this law passed. That the NRA is playing this as their effort and win is disgusting and out of line.


42 posted on 04/14/2010 6:26:26 PM PDT by BCR #226 (07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226

What was the amount the NRA paid for lobbying and what was the amount the VCDL paid?

I thought you guys didn’t like the NRA sending out letters? What do you call “a few”?

Chances are, the bill wouldn’t have passed without the support of the 800 pound gorilla?


43 posted on 04/14/2010 7:00:35 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
Open up a restaurant but don’t invite the public.

Yeah, well that's the kind of thing a business owner should think about. But it should be his decision, not the govt's.

44 posted on 04/14/2010 7:11:20 PM PDT by TChris ("Hello", the politician lied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

It would have passed 10 years ago except NRA WOULD NOT support it. They consistantly derailed all of the efforts to repeal it. Sorry, the NRA was wrong on this from beginning to end.


45 posted on 04/14/2010 10:33:45 PM PDT by BCR #226 (07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226

It would never had passed ten years ago. Ten years ago, we were still fighting for basic CCW laws and you know it.

So answer the questions. How much effort did your group spend on lobbying as opposed to the NRA?


46 posted on 04/15/2010 4:01:30 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
I am one of thousands of VCDL members that lobbied for this. We wrote letters and emails, made phone calls, and personally visited the members of both houses of the Virginia General Assembly, every year since I became a member (1997). I have NEVER seen any positive presence from the NRA on this issue, or any other Virginia specific gun bill I can think of. As a matter of fact the NRA has opposed state wide pro-gun initiatives, and even endorsed anti-gun incumbent Republican candidates over solidly pro-gun candidates in House of Delegates races.

That said, I am an NRA Life Member since I was 16 (I am 53 now), and I do support them on national issues, but they bear little to no credit for repealing this ban. It is something the VCDL has been hammering away on since it was implemented as a carrot to get "Shall Issue" legislation passed back in 1995, they/we deserve the credit.

47 posted on 04/15/2010 4:15:16 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mashood
Thanks... If I enter an establishment with the sign forbidding CCW.. they’d never know it.

Probably true. BUT, if you carry a concealed handgun into an establishment that has a legally valid posted notice that concealed weapons are not allowed there, and you inadvertently expose your weapon so that it is noticed, and you are confronted/challenged by a law enforcement officer, then you will probably be charged with a class 2 misdemeanor of criminal trespass -- which in most states can result in the revocation of your CCW license.

48 posted on 04/15/2010 6:15:22 AM PDT by VRWCmember (Gun Control - the ability to consistently hit the intended target)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

In Virginia, shall issue and the ban passed in 1995. I started lobbying and fighting in 1996. In that time, I gave testimony before the militia and police committee along with about 20 VCDL members (at the time I was not a member and was only a member of VCDL for about 2 years) at every hearing that came up. Out of those times, the NRA had one representative there who spoke against the repeal. Never, did he once speak out favoring our rights. I stopped lobbying Richmond when I left the state in 2006.

As to what VCDL spent, I don’t know. Ask VCDL. While your at it, as the NRA why they were against the ban repeal. Ask them how much they lobbied Mims in order to kill the repeal. Ask them how much they spent to restrict our rights in Virginia.

I don’t know why you have a problem and I really don’t care. I get sick of NRA apologists who won’t see what the NRA is really doing. Did you know the NRA tried at least 3 times to derail the Heller case? Did you know that the NRA lobbied Congress in support of “some” of the restrictive 1968 gun control act? Did you know the NRA threw machine guns under the bus in the 1986 Firearm Owners Protection Act? Did you know the NRA actively supported the Lautenberg Amendment that restricts your right to own a gun WITHOUT due process?

So before you hammer VCDL and the volunteers that did the work that the NRA is falsely taking credit for, step back and take a good hard look at what the NRA has really done for you. We are going to be fighting for years undoing the damage they have caused.

I don’t know where you were 10 years ago to state we were still fighting for basic CCW, I doubt you put even a 10th of the effort into the gun rights fight that I have, but that doesn’t matter. Shall issue passed in 1995. 15 years ago. 15 years ago, the NRA refused to support even THAT. I’ve been fighting for all of our gun rights for 20 years. I’ve written white papers to congress on the national security effects of gun control. I’ve marched in DC, Richmond and other places, I’ve lobbied Congress and several states legislatures on my own dime and time, I’ve organized mailing blitzes, I’ve confronted anti-gun politicians at every turn, I’ve been spit on, assaulted, cussed out, called very offensive names, and I’ve had my life threatened.

During all of this, the NRA did absolutely nothing except to stand on it’s own pomp and circumstance. We asked the NRA for help fighting the BATFE in several cases including the Olofson case out of Wisconson. The NRA refused to help an innocent man who had a malfuctioning firearm. We asked the NRA for help in fighting for Mr. John Glover when BATFE went after him because of a malfunctioning firearm. The NRA refused. Guess who stepped up to the plate? JPFO. Where was the NRA? Sending out membership renewal letters with “the gun ban is just around the corner” BS.

I’m working with Dick Heller on the Heller II case right now. The NRA tried taking that case over and we wouldn’t let them. Mr. Halbrooke is participating in the case on behalf of the NRA but the NRA still pushes to gain control of it. We’ve seen what they want to do and if they suceed, we will lose the case. I’m sure that they will take credit for this win just like they did in the original Heller case in which THEY HAD NO PART OF.

So please, tell me what the NRA has actually done for gun owners? I haven’t seen anything from them except stumbling blocks.


49 posted on 04/15/2010 9:38:00 AM PDT by BCR #226 (07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226

You still didn’t answer the question. How much did the VCDL spend and how much did the NRA spend in passing this bill?

The NRA didn’t try to stop Heller. They tried to stop Parker which we would have lost at the time.

The NRA didn’t lobby Congress for the 1968 gun law. They were not a lobbying group until the early 1974. There were threatened with the loss of their tax status if they lobbyied.

Your last complaint is the NRA DIDN’T get involved. Make up your mind.

The anti-gun politicians hate the NRA for stopping gun control. I’m sure they don’t even know the name of any other group.


50 posted on 04/15/2010 3:02:25 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

Yes I did, I said go ask them. Throwing money at problems usually doesn’t solve them. We volunteered our time and resources.

Um, yes, NRA DID try to stop Heller. I understand your distinction here and I’ll address it by saying that the NRA spent a bunch of money trying to dig dirt up on Heller to shut the case down. I’d suggest you do some real research on this.

The NRA has been lobbying since the 1930’s. Or haven’t you ever heard of the 1932 Uniform Machine Gun Act that was drafted, promoted and passed in many states in an “effort” to stall passage of what would become the 1934 NFA? I suggest you research it since Virginia is one of two states that still has it on the books. It’s been ruled Unconstitutional in well over a dozen other states including Mass. As for the 1968 GCA, I’d suggest you research the correspondance from Congressional records between the NRA and Mr. Thomas Dodd. You might be very surprised at what you find. While you’re at it, see what Winchester, Remington and Ruger had to say about it...

The NRA gets involved on the wrong side in many issues when they bother to get involved at all.

Obviously, I’m not going to change your mind and frankly, I don’t care. I suggest you research just what the NRA has and hasn’t been involved in for the last 80 years and quit being a blind apologist for them. Either that or maybe you’re on the payroll of the NRA and need to justify a salary or something... Seriously, check out their history. Ask them why haven’t they done anything proactive like challange the Hughes Amendment? Why did they compromise on the 1994 AW ban when a sunset was put in place?

We’re challenging the NFA... why won’t the NRA get involved with that? They’ve been invited. Why didn’t the NRA step up to the plate and stop the BATFE from setting precedence that a malfunctioning firearm can send you to jail in direct conflict with two prior SCOTUS decisions. The NRA was asked multiple times to help David Olofson out and they refused.

But keep supporting the NRA. By all means, they’ve kept us on the edge of our seats since 1932. I’ll tell you what, you get the NRA to proactively go after the NFA and the Hughes Amendment and WIN the cases and I’ll organize a nation wide fund raiser for them. If they get the Hughes Amendment ruled Unconstitutional through SCOTUS, I will eat crow and work to triple their membership, double their coffers, and hell, I’ll even lobby for them for FREE for a year.

Ask the anti gun politicans which group they hate more... NRA or JPFO. You’ll be surprised.

Have a nice day.


51 posted on 04/15/2010 6:51:05 PM PDT by BCR #226 (07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226

You’re wrong on all counts.

The NRA became a lobbying group in 1974 with the OLA. That didn’t work out too well so in 1974 they started the ILA.

And no, it was Parker which we would have lost without Alito and Roberts. What year did Heller start and what year did Alito and Roberts join the Supreme Court?

Now you’re asking for the NRA’s help after getting upset with the way they do things.

I’ll also give you a little tidbit. JPFO is listed as an educational group. They are not a lobbying group and would lose their tax status if they did. I like JPFO but they haven’t done a very good job in convincing jews to vote against the antigunners.

How much money does your group pour into lawsuits outside of Virginia? The Morton Grove gun ban is gone thanks to the NRA and the SAF.


52 posted on 04/15/2010 7:12:42 PM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

Heller and Parker both were original plaintiffs. I know because I’m working with Mr. Heller now on Heller II and we’ve discussed the history of the original Heller case in detail.

Go read your history. The NRA has been involved in legislation since 1932. They can claim all they want but the NRA wrote and lobbied for the Uniform Machinegun Act and had communication with Thomas Dodd in 1967 and 68 concerning the GCA. They’ve been involved in many other aspects of legislation as well over the decades.


53 posted on 04/15/2010 10:40:09 PM PDT by BCR #226 (07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: BCR #226

I read the history and the NRA didn’t become a lobbying group until 1974. That is a fact.

The only thing they ever did prior to that was inform their members of legislation. It was a violation of their tax status to do more and during the 1968 debates they were threatened with the loss of their tax status if they did more.

You still have ignored the original question.

Also as far as the history of the NRA, I don’t get that from nonmembers who have a grudge since the 1930’s.


54 posted on 04/16/2010 4:01:18 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA /Patron - TSRA- IDPA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5

I have not ignored the original question, I told you to go ask the source itself, not me.

The NRA claims to not have been a lobbying organization due to legal reasons but history shows differently... From their own publication no less....

“The NRA supported The National Firearms Act of 1934 which taxes and requires registration of such firearms as machine guns, sawed-off rifles and sawed-off shotguns. ... NRA support of Federal gun legislation did not stop with the earlier Dodd bills. It currently backs several Senate and House bills which, through amendment, would put new teeth into the National and Federal Firearms Acts.” —American Rifleman, March 1968, P. 22

“The NRA supported the original ‘Dodd Bill’ to amend the Federal Firearms Act in regard to handguns when it was introduced as S.1975 in August, 1963. Among its provisions was the requirement that a purchaser submit a notarized statement to the shipper that he was over 18 and not legally disqualified from possessing a handgun.” (P. 22)

“In January, 1965, with the continued support of the NRA, Senator Dodd introduced an amended version of his first bill, now designated 5.14 and expanded to cover rifles and shotguns as well as handguns.” (P. 22)

And here’s the kicker from testimony by Mr. LaPierre during the 106 Congress hearings...

“We think it’s reasonable to support the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act. ... We think it’s reasonable to expect full enforcement of federal firearms laws by the federal government. ... That’s why we support Project Exile — the fierce prosecution of federal gun laws...we think it’s reasonable because it works. ... We only support what works and our list is proud.”

—NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre
Congressional Testimony, May 27, 1999
Hearing Before 106th Congress
House of Representatives
Committee On The Judiciary
Subcommittee On Crime
First Session

A simple google search is your friend. I’m done with you here.


55 posted on 04/16/2010 6:48:15 AM PDT by BCR #226 (07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson