Posted on 04/17/2010 7:06:25 AM PDT by george76
I think GS used to be very good at making money by following the rules. When it become too difficult to make as much money following the rules they decided it was no longer necessary to follow the rules. I happen to believe that greed is good as long as it is held in check by ethical behavior.
Of course. This is all about Obama trying to show the left-wing base that he is not in the pocket of the banks.
Not true of course but this is just a short-term scheme cooked up by the WH and likely GS itself to try to light a fire under left-wing activists in advance of Nov.
The Banks must not be giving the Obamaites enough of the Vig, and this civil action is a way to extort more out of them. If Goldman is “guilty as charged”, then those responsible and who knowingly profited should be thrown into a ditch and shot (after a fair trial of course, like with KSM).
I see it as more of a political move...a way to excite the left-wing for the election...those who have soured on Zero because he supported TARP and hasn't gone after the banks enough.
The number of threads about this on DU indicates that they are rising to the bait.
And the Stoopid Party will be there hapless as ever cheerleading for “the street.”
The list, ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.