Skip to comments.
Amazon's suit vs. North Carolina about preventing e-commerce witch hunt
ZDnet,cim ^
| April 20th, 2010
| Larry Dignan
Posted on 04/20/2010 8:50:08 AM PDT by RicocheT
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
To: RobRoy
And I believe they were successful at billing the residents for unpaid tax. If they pull this, the victims need to make it "revenue neutral".
21
posted on
04/20/2010 7:12:57 PM PDT
by
an amused spectator
(Watching the MSM with Obama is like watching Joslyn James with Tiger Woods)
To: OldDeckHand
What is interesting is that Amazon (I believe) doesn’t have ANY actual business holdings in the state of North Carolina. Essentially, NC is asking to review the financials of a company for which it has no jurisdiction or oversight authority.
Essentially NC believes it has the right to know what residents of NC buy, read, and watch.
Then again, Obama won North Carolina, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised that such a state believes it has the right to access its residents' buying habits.
To: RicocheT
The same North Carolina DOR that’s been sitting on my $725 tax refund for TWO MONTHS now. Yeah. Those guys.
}:-)4
23
posted on
04/21/2010 7:32:10 AM PDT
by
Moose4
(Wasting away again in Michaelnifongville.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-23 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson