Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Left Needs Racism: It serves a political purpose
Wall Street Journal ^ | 04/19/2010 | James Taranto

Posted on 04/20/2010 5:55:42 PM PDT by iowamark

...A black guy walks into a tea party, and a white lady says to him, "You know, we don't get many African-Americans in here." The black guy replies, "And at these prices, it's no wonder!"

The joke, at least as we originally heard it, involves a kangaroo and a bartender. The news report, brought to our attention by the fellows at NewsBusters.org, involved NBC reporter Kelly O'Donnell and tea-party activist Darryl Postell. O'Donnell approached Postell at a Washington rally, and hilarity ensued...

Imagine Kelly O'Donnell questioning a black man in a largely white company or university or country club or suburb the way she interrogated Darryl Postell. She would come off as clueless and prejudiced--as, come to think of it, she does.

The political left claims to love racial diversity, but it bitterly opposes such diversity on the political right. This is an obvious matter of political self-interest: Since 1964, blacks have voted overwhelmingly Democratic. If Republicans were able to attract black votes, the result would be catastrophic for the Democratic Party. Even in 2008, the Democrats' best presidential year since '64, if the black vote had been evenly split between the parties (and holding the nonblack vote constant), Barack Obama would have gotten about 48% of the vote and John McCain would be president.

To keep blacks voting Democratic, it is necessary for the party and its supporters to keep alive the idea that racism is prevalent in America and to portray the Republican Party (as well as independent challengers to the Democrats, such as the tea-party movement) as racist. The election of Barack Obama made nonsense of the idea that America remains a racist country and thereby necessitated an intensifying of attacks on the opposition as racist.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; liberalracism; liberals; lineralfascism; wsj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
James Taranto is on The O'Reilly Factor tonight discussing this article, at about 20 minutes after the hour.
1 posted on 04/20/2010 5:55:42 PM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: iowamark

http://online.wsj.com/public/search?article-doc-type={Best+of+the+Web+Today}&HEADER_TEXT=best+of+the+web+today

Taranto’s daily “Best of the Web” column is a must read!


2 posted on 04/20/2010 5:57:59 PM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Sharpton doesn’t get paid unless theirs some “racism” out there that needs pimpin’


3 posted on 04/20/2010 5:58:01 PM PDT by Flightdeck (Go Longhorns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Glenn Beck had Dr Alveda King on his show tonight. In my opinion, she’s a beautiful example of why the democrats are becoming increasingly desperate.

Blacks are like crack cocaine to the democrat party and the supply is showing signs of drying up.


4 posted on 04/20/2010 5:59:46 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

Without racism, the left would cease to exist. IMHO


5 posted on 04/20/2010 5:59:56 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck
Sharpton doesn’t get paid unless theirs some “racism” out there that needs pimpin’

Sharpton gets paid every time he's on Fox News. He's not oiling up his mullet and getting in his best basketweave loafers for nothing.

6 posted on 04/20/2010 6:05:08 PM PDT by Hillbillary (I know how to deal with Communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

I should have said “without the threat of racism as an argument.” My bad.


7 posted on 04/20/2010 6:05:36 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

O’Reilly just asked Charles Krauthammer whether he believed that the Democratic Party leadership was deliberately using accusations of white racism to keep blacks voting the Democratic ticket. O’Reilly just couldn’t believe that the Democrats would do a thing like that.

If anyone ever needed an example of how treacherous Bill O’Reilly is, tonight should settle the matter. He is going to defend Obama no matter what the cost.


8 posted on 04/20/2010 6:09:23 PM PDT by SkipW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkipW

I don’t think O’Reilly is treacherous. I think his defense of Obama has a “Some of my best friends are black” ring to it.


9 posted on 04/20/2010 6:21:27 PM PDT by wolfpat (Moderate=Clueless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SkipW

Hopefully he’s just playing devil’s advocate.


10 posted on 04/20/2010 6:22:04 PM PDT by A_perfect_lady (If one racist Tea-Partier proves all conservatives hate, what do 500 Muslim suicide bombers prove?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

bump


11 posted on 04/20/2010 6:26:53 PM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkipW

Bill and Barry are both Harvard guys. Can’t speak ill of a fellow alumnus, now, can we?


12 posted on 04/20/2010 6:32:52 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

I’ve stated this here at FR recently and I’ll say
it again. The Democrat party is a collection of
disparate groups with some common interests. That
makes it easier for the Sharptons, Jacksons, and
Dysons to preach to the masses how none of them
are going to make it unless they do it as a group
under the leadership of the plantation foremen
who happen to be people like Sharpton, Jackson,
and Michael E. Dyson.

Republicans don’t really have the same attitude
about groups. At least I don’t. We tend to focus
on people as individuals. We place more impor-
tance on what people are like as individuals.
Do they think like we do? If they don’t are
they pretty nice people anyway? And, I think we
tend to attract the kind of black Americans who
we believe think like individuals instead of
going along with the race baiters version of
the world.

Things won’t change very much any time soon.
We’re not about to change our beliefs and
the simplicity of the other side’s “group
think” is too much of a magnet for us to attract
many African-Americans. Still, we appreciate
the fact that there seems to be more and
more reasonable people willing to think
outside the racial box.


13 posted on 04/20/2010 6:36:44 PM PDT by Sivad (NorCal Red Turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
We have been saying this forever! I am truly excited that a WSJ writer has published a column about the abuse of black people by the democrat party.

IT IS ABOUT DAMN TIME!

14 posted on 04/20/2010 6:49:17 PM PDT by Republic (Stop the horrific liberals from spending ONE MORE DIME before they destroy our nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
To keep blacks voting Democratic, it is necessary for the party and its supporters to keep alive the idea that racism is prevalent in America and to portray the Republican Party (as well as independent challengers to the Democrats, such as the tea-party movement) as racist.

But they can't. Tea Parties ROCK!

15 posted on 04/20/2010 7:04:44 PM PDT by Libloather (Tea totaler, PROUD birther, mobster, pro-lifer, anti-warmer, enemy of the state, extremist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

It amazes me that anyone is “shocked” by the lack of blacks at tea parties. The current occupant of the White House has 97% support of the black community which represents approximately 12.4% of the US population, or about 38,000,000 total. The 3% that don’t support the president only leaves about 1,100,000 blacks IN THE ENTIRE UNITED STATES that could possibly come out to the tea parties.

The issue should be, as the writer correctly points out, why are 97% of blacks supporters of the current occupant of the White House.


16 posted on 04/20/2010 7:24:59 PM PDT by BamaBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BamaBlue

Now if instead of a tea party they had a malt liquor party...


17 posted on 04/20/2010 7:27:39 PM PDT by seowulf ("If you write a whole line of zeroes, it's still---nothing"...Kira Alexandrovna Argounova)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SkipW
O’Reilly just couldn’t believe that the Democrats would do a thing like that.

Proving that O'Reilly just got off the turnip truck...

18 posted on 04/20/2010 7:40:35 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wolfpat

You could be right, but O’Reilly is much farther to the left than he is perceived to be.


19 posted on 04/20/2010 9:52:58 PM PDT by SkipW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

Ha! I had the same thought, but there is just too much that O’Reilly has done that seems sneaky left for me to give him that benefit of the doubt.


20 posted on 04/20/2010 9:56:29 PM PDT by SkipW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson