Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House slams latest 'birther' move
CNN ^ | 4/21/10 | Anderson Cooper/Ed Henry

Posted on 04/21/2010 11:27:28 AM PDT by pissant

Edited on 04/21/2010 11:29:49 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

White House aides are scoffing at a move in the Arizona legislature to force President Obama to show his birth certificate to get on the state's ballot in 2012 for his likely re-election battle.


(Excerpt) Read more at ac360.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 10amendment; 2012election; arizona; bho44; bhofascism; bhotyranny; birthcertificate; bloggers; certifigate; flopsweat; larrysinclairslover; naturalborncitizen; obama; statesrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-268 next last
To: STARWISE

Love the ping picture. I think the effort to quit smoking (if there ever was one) is going to suffer a serious setback over the next few months.


121 posted on 04/21/2010 12:42:05 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
“This is a question that has been answered exhaustively,”

...but by no means satisfactorily.

122 posted on 04/21/2010 12:43:31 PM PDT by TheThinker (Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenerio at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Dear Arizona ...


123 posted on 04/21/2010 12:45:27 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Now, why would WH aides concern themselves about it at all?

It's not like it's going to affect their job security or anything. Right?

124 posted on 04/21/2010 12:45:51 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativegramma

Just went to the DAR site and found the following:
“Any woman is eligible for membership who is no less than eighteen years of age and can prove lineal, blood line descent from an ancestor who aided in achieving American independence. She must provide documentation for each statement of birth, marriage, and death.”

I’m guess thing whole “blood line descent” makes us adoptees ineligible??? I guess I now know the reason the family historian refuses to name me correctly in our family tree (which is on file with the DAR) despite my insistence that she has my middle and first names backwards. Is this common practice? I do find it ironic that my sister — who found her birth mother, and found out her birth father was a Mexican citizen is listed correctly in the tree though. Very strange, IMHO.


125 posted on 04/21/2010 12:46:28 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Ummm... the hospital where I was born no longer exists. So, if I were a presidential candidate, they wouldn’t be able to provide a birthcertificate.

But unlike Obama, I'm sure you can attest to which hospital you were born.

126 posted on 04/21/2010 12:46:40 PM PDT by TheThinker (Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenerio at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker

“...but by no means satisfactorily.”

I think that they subscribe to the Pee Wee Herman concept: Going through the cycle “AM TOO!, “ARE NOT!” a few thousand times is “exhaustively” answering.


127 posted on 04/21/2010 12:47:30 PM PDT by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I would think they would want any potential President to prove his eligibility. Wouldn’t they?


128 posted on 04/21/2010 12:47:44 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
I don't think he'll be seeking reelection, anyway.
129 posted on 04/21/2010 12:50:14 PM PDT by unspun (PRAY & WORK FOR FREEDOM - investigatingobama.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg
It’s the question that may ultimately start the shooting war.

Better to start early or at least be prepared in advance as a deterrent. And if the shooting is inevitable, the American patriot public will be better prepared before the Marxists really get control of every aspect of our lives.

130 posted on 04/21/2010 12:50:17 PM PDT by TheThinker (Communists: taking over the world one kooky doomsday scenerio at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Obviously claiming birth in Hawaii doesn’t mean very much as that state is so secretive of attestation.


131 posted on 04/21/2010 12:50:19 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aquila48
There must be quite a fire underneath this smoke



There's nothing to see here, all is well. Keep moving.Photobucket
132 posted on 04/21/2010 12:56:29 PM PDT by Canedawg (I'm not digging this tyranny thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: rocket002
IF the original birth certificate is uncovered at a later date after BO finishes his term and it shows that he is not a natural born citizen, would that invalidate his presidency and any bills that he signed into law?

The Left has been preparing this for a long time. He will be termed their "fake, but accurate" President, as they'll claim he governed faithfully according to the Left's teleprompter script (Borg), not out of his unnaturally-born seff therefore his ineligibility should not matter, haha.

If Barry's ineligibility is ultimately "uncovered" a more immediate question will be what to do about the BATF tanks and Surgeon General's police surrounding the Supreme Court Building without needless bloodshed.

HF

133 posted on 04/21/2010 12:58:43 PM PDT by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: pissant

“This is a question that has been answered exhaustively,”

Exactly.

This bill will prevent such questions for future candidates.

Wink. Wink.


134 posted on 04/21/2010 1:00:59 PM PDT by CriticalJ (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But then I repeat myself. MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheThinker
And if the shooting is inevitable, the American patriot public will be better prepared before the Marxists really get control of every aspect of our lives.

Very true. The reason I went on a limb to suggest that scenario is because THEY have made noise about there being violence if there is an attempt to remove him. This is the issue that has THEM making those underground, rumbling threats of which we have heard.
135 posted on 04/21/2010 1:02:43 PM PDT by Canedawg (I'm not digging this tyranny thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: pissant
I suspect it may say he is a gay, drugged up, Muslim, possibly exchange student. Me bad, I was referring to his missing school records. Maybe we could get an amendment including the school records.
136 posted on 04/21/2010 1:02:46 PM PDT by Friendofgeorge ( SARAH PALIN or BUST.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks

I disagree with anything that makes us look less than bright..such as suggesting Obama is not an American citizen..and I disagree even more with the sudden popularity of snarky comments coming from our candidates and others..the snarky comments suggest our argument lacks credibility and depth. I do not know why all of a sudden this is so popular. Debate policy...debate the issues...leave the snarkiness behind.


137 posted on 04/21/2010 1:04:30 PM PDT by DallasSun (i believe in separation of church and hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: ResistorSister

Why would you put a burden like that on the hospital? They didn’t ask him to run for office. The burden should be on the one who is running.


138 posted on 04/21/2010 1:09:48 PM PDT by scott7278 ("...I have not changed Congress and how it operates the way I would have liked." BHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

Exactly, just as it should be. SOS’s have not been doing their jobs.


139 posted on 04/21/2010 1:10:08 PM PDT by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
I'm sorry. I'm afraid its by blood. The requirements state the following:

"Any woman is eligible for membership who is no less than eighteen years of age and can prove lineal, blood line descent from an ancestor who aided in achieving American independence. She must provide documentation for each statement of birth, marriage, and death."

When questions come up regarding can an adopted child join the following is the official response:

"Yes, but only through your birth parents' lineage, not that of your adopted family. All lineage for DAR membership must be bloodline descent."

Seems cruel to adoptees, I know. Maybe this should be a push to unseal those records???? Adoptees have the right to know their blood lineage!!!

140 posted on 04/21/2010 1:12:19 PM PDT by conservativegramma (If Congress refuses to listen, its taxation without representation all over again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-268 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson