Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CALIFORNIA: Supreme Court rejects Schwarzenegger furlough consolidation
Sacramento Bee ^ | 4/22/10 | Jon Ortiz

Posted on 04/22/2010 1:01:24 PM PDT by SmithL

The California Supreme Court has rejected Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's request that it take up seven key furlough lawsuits now in two appellate courts and freeze more than a dozen others in trial courts around the state. The decision ends the possibility for a relatively quick resolution to about two dozen furlough lawsuits in courts around the state.

The court posted the decision on its website this morning: "The application to transfer and consolidate appeals now pending in the Court of Appeal to this court is denied." Justice Joyce Kennard dissented.

Schwarzenegger is embroiled in 25 active lawsuits in various stages of litigation in courts from Sacramento to Los Angeles. On Mar. 2, his attorneys asked the state's high court to consolidate and review seven cases related to the governor's furlough authority, . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; furlough; goldenstate; schwarzenegger; yourtaxdollarsatwork

1 posted on 04/22/2010 1:01:24 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Arnie should just tell them all to go suck an egg and then resign.


2 posted on 04/22/2010 1:12:24 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (We will secure the borders ..and . never again bring forward another amnesty bill - Ted Kennedy '86)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

...then resign.

That is not a bad idea. All heck is going to break loose in CA and his resignation would just make it happen sooner.


3 posted on 04/22/2010 1:21:47 PM PDT by LuvFreeRepublic (Support our military or leave. I will help you pack BO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Thud

This means what?


4 posted on 04/22/2010 1:27:31 PM PDT by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"The road ro hell is paved with good intentions." -- Karl Marx

And the road to hell is exactly what Marxist Democrats are following across all of the United States.

5 posted on 04/22/2010 1:32:10 PM PDT by OldNavyVet (One trillion days, at 365 days per year, is 2,739,726,027 years ... almost 3 billion years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing

Dig up the lawn and plant potatoes


6 posted on 04/22/2010 1:32:17 PM PDT by spokeshave (They'll get my false teeth when they pry them from my sister's cold, dead mouth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet

7 posted on 04/22/2010 1:45:01 PM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ("The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants"-Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing

It means the California Supreme Court will rule on the legality of the forced furloughs later than sooner. The longer the furlough days go on without a ruling, the more exposure California has to paying back pay to the employees.

IF the California Supreme Court rules the furloughs are illegal and IF they rule that the State of California must pay back-pay to all of the employees who were illegally furloughed, then the longer the ruling takes, the more free days off from work the employees are getting.

The California Supreme Court will rule on this eventually, but a sooner ruling settles things. Arnold does not a sooner ruling. He is hoping to ride out of town without any ruling. Then if a huge back payment is required, it won’t come on his watch. He is just trying to get through his last state budget cycle with the least pain.


8 posted on 04/22/2010 1:52:45 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Bye bye Miss American Freedom. When did we vote for Communism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing

I forgot to add that the case is before the appeals courts now so this means the case will have to exhaust appeals before being kicked up to the California Supreme Court. Had they taken the case now, then it would have sped up the ruling significantly, skipping over the appeals process.

They are going by the book and letting the cases filter up through appeals.


9 posted on 04/22/2010 1:55:29 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Bye bye Miss American Freedom. When did we vote for Communism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing

The lawsuits proceed in various courts at the normal glacial pace rather than being consolidated and quickly resolved in one action. Think of it as Chinese water torture.


10 posted on 04/22/2010 2:08:35 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

This should be interesting, Cali is broke so what are they going to do? I smell a court ordered tax increase coming down the pike.


11 posted on 04/22/2010 2:13:38 PM PDT by trapped_in_LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing
“This means what?”

California will go millions and millions more into debt paying for lawyers to jabber back and forth while the State accelerates down the financial crapper.

12 posted on 04/22/2010 2:15:39 PM PDT by Gabrial (The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Bad in that it needs to be done. Good in that the sooner California defaults and goes into complete economic collapse the better for the nation a a whole. California, Illinois and New York are the power bases of the administration. Illinois is already a basket case. The war on Wall Street will soon render New York a gutted corpse. If California goes into the dumpster of history along with the other two the obvious failure of the Obama Regime's Marxist economic plans will be on display for all to see. I doubt those three state (my own state being one of the three) can be saved. But if they fail soon and in a dramatic fashion then the rest of the nation might be saved.
13 posted on 04/22/2010 2:19:51 PM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

He should hire an army of lawyers and drag out the lawsuits for years to come. The lawsuits are self funding with the un paid wages of the furloughed workers.

He should force a strike


14 posted on 04/22/2010 2:22:48 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Ostracize Democrats. There can be no Democrat friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Swordmaker; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...
Schwarzenegger is embroiled in 25 active lawsuits in various stages of litigation in courts from Sacramento to Los Angeles. On Mar. 2, his attorneys asked the state's high court to consolidate and review seven cases related to the governor's furlough authority...
Thanks SmithL.
15 posted on 04/22/2010 3:36:15 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoGOP

Actually that is a good point. If the blue states all go belly up financially, the red state will have all the financial clout.

The only caveat is, those in the blue states would have even more incentive to vote for outright communism, paid for by the financially healthy red states.


16 posted on 04/22/2010 3:42:11 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Bye bye Miss American Freedom. When did we vote for Communism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bert

The California furloughs were temporary and are slated to end in June. there are no furloughs scheduled after June 1, 2010.


17 posted on 04/22/2010 3:43:43 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Bye bye Miss American Freedom. When did we vote for Communism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bert

I typoed that.

The furloughs end June 30, 2010. No furloughs after July 1, 2010.


18 posted on 04/22/2010 3:44:20 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Bye bye Miss American Freedom. When did we vote for Communism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I am a little befuddled by the Court’s decision to not consolidate the cases. The unions are going bankrupt the State, one way or the other.


19 posted on 04/22/2010 5:46:39 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson