|
> You suggested the political agenda. Negative. YOU suggested it first. Go back and look. Furthermore, this is a matter of prima facie. And the fact is, Obama has never produced it to anyone possessing a hint of credibility or political neutrality.
|
|
> You suggested the political agenda. Negative. YOU suggested it first. Go back and look. Furthermore, this is a matter of prima facie. And the fact is, Obama has never produced it to anyone possessing a hint of credibility or political neutrality.
|
In fact, you can't show me that because I never suggested it. Not on this thread or any other.
I have always maintained that his actions are misguided because he was duped by some birther Internet rumors that he cited in his article on American Thinker. If I thought he seriously had a political agenda, I'd rip him apart (in a vanity thread, a personal letter to him through safeguardourconstitution.com, and as many op-eds as I could get published) for dishonoring conservatives, himself and his fellow soldiers who risk all for us.
Twice on this thread (#139 & #169) you have said that this case is unfolding exactly as it was intended. You're the one with the political agenda because you think this whole affair is productive and necessary.
It isn't necessary or productive. It's just tragic.
