Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

He didn’t disobey an order, he refused an illegal order. There’ a difference. The difference is defined by the BC, so if obumber refuses to show it and the good LTC goes to jail. It will be because obumber refused to show it.


70 posted on 04/22/2010 7:08:15 PM PDT by JoSixChip (You think your having a bad day?.....Somewhere out there is a Mr. Pelosi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: JoSixChip

He didn’t disobey an order, he refused an illegal order. There’ a difference.


[Theres’ a difference] is what the court martial will try to determine and rule on don’t you reckon?


71 posted on 04/22/2010 7:19:07 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: JoSixChip
The problem with that logic is that the Army issued a "counseling form" warning Lakin his deployment orders were valid before they charged him.

This counseling is to inform you that your deployment orders are presumed to be valid and lawful orders issued by competent military authority ...

82 posted on 04/22/2010 8:05:02 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson