Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Leonard210; bolobaby
"archaeologists ruled out an established human settlement, explaining one had never been found above 11,500 feet"

How do the facts it was found above known human settlement on Mt. Ararat and not bolobaby's front yard make it the ark?


32 posted on 04/27/2010 10:15:02 AM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: I see my hands

“How do the facts it was found above known human settlement on Mt. Ararat and not bolobaby’s front yard make it the ark?”

You see your hands but you did not read my post. I did not say it was an ark.

But if a document was found that was clearly proven to be several thousand years old and that document claimed that an ark landed in bolobaby’s front yard and while bolobaby was digging around he discovered a large hewn lumber structure, he may well surmise that it may be something other than an ancient Pizza Hut.

It doesn’t make it an ark, but it doesn’t make it a 13,000 foot high previously unknown settlement either. It simply makes it a very interesting archeological site in the vicinity where an ark was claimed to have settled in an ancient document.

It may be proven a hoax, a long lost tribe or a Turkish Taco Bell, but at this point an ark doesn’t defy logic.


70 posted on 04/27/2010 12:50:53 PM PDT by Leonard210 (Tagline? We don't need no stinkin' tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson