Obama Confirmed Ineligible for Office?

We don't have a precedent to establish how a usurper should be removed from office. It wasn't discovered until Leo Donofrio documented it that Chester Arthur was ineligible to be POTUS. Even so, Arthur was the sitting President while in office.

The Constitution says that the President-elect must take the oath of office "before entering upon the Execution of" the office of POTUS. Obama is presently executing the office of POTUS.

I don't think it's a given that Obama can be removed by the courts. They can rule on his eligibility (I don't think they will) but it would probably be up to Congress to actually remove him. And I think they'd have to pass legislation mandating how to remove a sitting POTUS who is found to be ineligible to the office he holds.

Even then Obama is such an arrogant thug, he'd probably challenge any such legislation. He has no honor. So he wouldn't resign voluntarily.

Your thoughts?

They didn’t. That’s my point. Since the term is not defined within the Constitution, we must look elsewhere for the definition. We have Vattel’s definition as convincing evidence of what the FF intended. But even then, Vattel’s definition is man’s definition, not God’s.

If God doesn’t want Barack Obama to be president, God will end his presidency at any time of God’s choosing.

Until then, the law of man has found the terms “Citizen-at-birth,” “native-citizen,” and “natural born citizen” to be synonomous and they are used interchangeably in several US Supreme Court decisions.

For example, the 1964 US Supreme Court decision in Schneider v Rusk (377 US 163) uses native born and natural born interchanageably: “We start from the premise that the rights of citizenship of the native born and of the naturalized person are of the same dignity and are coextensive. The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the “natural born” citizen is eligible to be President. Art. II S 1.
Distinctions between native-born and naturalized citizens in conncection with foreign residence are drawn in the Constitution itself. Only a native-born may become President. Art.II Section 1.”

“The address given for the parents in the newspaper announcements is actually, however, the August 1961 home address of Obama’s maternal grandparents Stanley and Madelyn Dunham [6085 Kalanianaole Highway], and not the 1961 home address of Barack Obama, Sr. [625 11th Ave].)”

But the 6085 Kalanianaole Hwy address ALSO was the listed address for Anne Dunham. It’s reasonable to infer from her being enrolled in school in Seattle for fall 1961 classes that by the time of the birth, she and Sr. were already estranged. So it is not surprising that her address rather than his would have been listed on BC. I don’t think that the address used in the newspaper announcements provides strong evidence one way or the other about whether Obama actually was born in Honolulu or merely had a BC applied for after being born somewhere else.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.