Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jury convicts Palin e-mail intruder on two counts
Knoxville News Sentinel ^ | 4/30/10

Posted on 04/30/2010 12:21:13 PM PDT by SmithL

KNOXVILLE — A federal jury this afternoon convicted Sarah Palin e-mail intruder David C. Kernell of felony destruction of records to hamper a federal investigation and misdemeanor unlawfully obtaining information from a protected computer.

The jury acquitted Kernell, 22, of wire fraud.

It remains deadlocked on felony identity theft.

It’s unclear if U.S. District Judge Thomas W. Phillips will order the jurors, in their fourth day of deliberations, to continue.

(Excerpt) Read more at knoxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: 2008electionbias; 2010electionbbias; cultureofcorruption; davidckernell; davidkernell; dncbrownshirts; getpalin; hacker; hacking; howtostealanelection; kernell; movealong; nothingtoseehere; palin; palinemails; palinfreeperping; palinkernellhacker; pravdamedia; ratcrime; sarahpalin; sonofademocrat; watergate2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

1 posted on 04/30/2010 12:21:13 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Unbelievable.


2 posted on 04/30/2010 12:22:05 PM PDT by Reagan69 (Let me know when those insurance premiums go down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Jury Convicts Palin.....

nice headline from the left media.


3 posted on 04/30/2010 12:22:36 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com << Get your science fiction and fiction test marketed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

Of course, if Fox News could possibly break away from Janet... we might hear some news.


4 posted on 04/30/2010 12:23:39 PM PDT by Reagan69 (Let me know when those insurance premiums go down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Which charges would put him in jail?


5 posted on 04/30/2010 12:24:47 PM PDT by Reagan69 (Let me know when those insurance premiums go down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

He got convicted on Obstruction of Justice..he could serve 20 years in the pokey. In prison, David will have many guys who are “Not his type” he should remember to bend over..I hope he enjoys his stay


6 posted on 04/30/2010 12:25:07 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

If this happens to me, some kid logging on as me and changing my password, I say yes, it certainly is identity theft.


7 posted on 04/30/2010 12:25:27 PM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

I don’t see how it isn’t wire tapping to go in and snoop someone else’s account after hacking it.


8 posted on 04/30/2010 12:26:36 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The hysteria of Matthewsism and Andersonism has led to a Tea Party Scare that is unAmerican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

“Which charges would put him in jail?”

Jail? You are kidding right? More likely he’ll get a cabinet level appointment from ‘Zero’!


9 posted on 04/30/2010 12:26:48 PM PDT by Kartographer (".. we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

Yeah, that is really the only one that matters. Wire fraud is a stretch and the misdemeanor is nothing. The judge will probably just tell the jury to tough it out a little more but will give up soon. They can give him whatever sentence they want on the obstruction charge alone.


10 posted on 04/30/2010 12:27:29 PM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

He deserves between 10 and 15 years in jail..and a HUGE fine, let’s see his big lib daddy pay that fine and choke on it


11 posted on 04/30/2010 12:28:29 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda
Yep, he sure needs to know to not drop his soap bars...

Justice served!

12 posted on 04/30/2010 12:28:52 PM PDT by newfreep (Palin/DeMint 2012 - Bolton: Secy of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

Well, justice isn’t served til we find out what sentence he gets..lets hope its HARD TIME


13 posted on 04/30/2010 12:30:01 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

I agree. And add the fact that it was meant to gather information that would be damaging to a candidate in an election. That’s high impact.


14 posted on 04/30/2010 12:31:31 PM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda; AmishDude

He’d better get serious prison time.

She was a vice presidential candidate, FGS and under Secret Service protection at the time, so we’re not talking about Sarah Q. Citizen.


15 posted on 04/30/2010 12:31:55 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The four charges, all felonies, are: identity theft, wire fraud, unlawfully obtaining information from a protected computer and destruction of records to hamper a federal investigation.

Interesting, I didn't consider that they would split on the three that they had already decided upon....

16 posted on 04/30/2010 12:32:48 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This is sad... MISDEMEANOR???

So, if the jury is deadlocked on the other charge what does that mean for the trial itself? A hung jury resulting in a mistrial???


17 posted on 04/30/2010 12:32:50 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarah Barracuda

LOL - that’s a good one, SB! He truly needs to pay a heavy duty price to discourage others when Sarah runs in 2012.....if, indeed, we have elections.


18 posted on 04/30/2010 12:33:29 PM PDT by newfreep (Palin/DeMint 2012 - Bolton: Secy of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Exactly. I don’t understand the jury’s acquittal on that charge at ALL.

I wonder if the prosecution brought up who this kid’s dad is within the trial - or if that’s even allowed. After all, he is the son of a sitting State Representative for the State of TN. What do you want to bet this kid bragged about his “Haxxor skillz” to Daddy and he said “go for it”???


19 posted on 04/30/2010 12:35:59 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Jurors “not following their instructions!” Could there be a few Palin derangement syndrome sufferers?


20 posted on 04/30/2010 12:36:07 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson