Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Despite plan, not a single fire boom on hand on Gulf Coast at time of oil spill
al.com ^ | May 3, 2010 | Ben Raines

Posted on 05/03/2010 4:25:54 PM PDT by veritas3

If U.S. officials had followed up on a 1994 response plan for a major Gulf oil spill, it is possible that the spill could have been kept under control and far from land.

The problem: The federal government did not have a single fire boom on hand.

U.S. Coast Guard, Petty Officer 1st Class Justin Sawyer)This April 28, 2010 image made from video released by the Deepwater Horizon Response Unified Command, shows an in situ burn in the Gulf of Mexico, in response to the oil spill after the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon. The "In-Situ Burn" plan produced by federal agencies in 1994 calls for responding to a major oil spill in the Gulf with the immediate use of fire booms.

But in order to conduct a successful test burn eight days after the Deepwater Horizon well began releasing massive amounts of oil into the Gulf, officials had to purchase one from a company in Illinois.

When federal officials called, Elastec/American Marine, shipped the only boom it had in stock, Jeff Bohleber, chief financial officer for Elastec, said today.

At federal officials' behest, the company began calling customers in other countries and asking if the U.S. government could borrow their fire booms for a few days, he said.

A single fire boom being towed by two boats can burn up to 1,800 barrels of oil an hour, Bohleber said. That translates to 75,000 gallons an hour, raising the possibility that the spill could have been contained at the accident scene 100 miles from shore.

"They said this was the tool of last resort. No, this is absolutely the asset of first use. Get in there and start burning oil before the spill gets out of hand," Bohleber said. "If they had six or seven of these systems in place when this happened and got out there and started burning, it would have significantly lessened the amount of oil that got loose."

In the days after the rig sank, U.S Coast Guard Rear Admiral Mary Landry said the government had all the assets it needed. She did not discuss why officials waited more than a week to conduct a test burn. (Watch video footage of the test burn.)

At the time, former National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration oil spill response coordinator Ron Gouguet -- who helped craft the 1994 plan -- told the Press-Register that officials had pre-approval for burning. "The whole reason the plan was created was so we could pull the trigger right away."

Gouguet speculated that burning could have captured 95 percent of the oil as it spilled from the well.

Bohleber said that his company was bringing several fire booms from South America, and he believed the National Response Center discovered that it had one in storage.

Each boom costs a few hundred thousand dollars, Bohleber said, declining to give a specific price.

Made of flame-retardant fabric, each boom has two pumps that push water through its 500-foot length. Two boats tow the U-shaped boom through an oil slick, gathering up about 75,000 gallons of oil at a time. That oil is dragged away from the larger spill, ignited and burns within an hour, he said.

The boom can be used as long as waves are below 3 feet, Bohleber said.

"Because of the complexity of the system and the obvious longer production time to build them, the emphasis is on obtaining and gathering the systems," he said.

Bohleber said his company has conducted numerous tests with the Coast Guard since 1993, and it is now training crews on the use of the boom so workers will be ready when they arrive.

"We're arranging for six to be shipped in. We keep running into delays. Hopefully, they will be here by Wednesday to be available for use on Thursday. Bear in mind, two days ago, we thought they would be here today."

INTERESTING DELAYS


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gulf; oilspill

1 posted on 05/03/2010 4:25:54 PM PDT by veritas3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: veritas3

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2505872/posts


2 posted on 05/03/2010 4:28:54 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veritas3

On it from DAY ONE


3 posted on 05/03/2010 4:30:12 PM PDT by Carley (WE CAN SEE NOVEMBER FROM OUR HOUSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Whoops, thought I had search the Freep site and didn’t find this article. Sorry it’s redundant.


4 posted on 05/03/2010 4:36:51 PM PDT by veritas3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: veritas3

Yep. THe Obama government is right on it, about 8 days too late.

Obie should have listened to the late John Lee Hooker when he sang:
“Boom, Boom, Boom”!


5 posted on 05/03/2010 4:48:09 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

Well then....this will be Honest Obe’s Katrina. That wraps it for me.


6 posted on 05/03/2010 4:52:53 PM PDT by chiller ( ALMOST SPEECHLESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: veritas3

I see the conspiracy theory people have now surfaced.
I found this article titled “US Orders Blackout Over North Korean Torpedoing Of Gulf Of Mexico Oil Rig” at http://texasfred.net/archives/6589


7 posted on 05/04/2010 4:12:33 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Comrade O has to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson