Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Porn probe snags S.F. planning officials
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 5/5/10 | Phillip Matier, Andrew Ross

Posted on 05/05/2010 7:49:41 AM PDT by SmithL

It seems the gang over at San Francisco's Planning Department has been looking at more than zoning codes on their computers - namely, porn.

According to City Hall sources, Planning Director John Rahaim has recommended the firing of four high-ups - including veteran Zoning Administrator Larry Badiner - for allegedly receiving and in some cases circulating X-rated photos and videos for years.

The material wasn't criminal - we're talking "Debbie Does Dallas" stuff, not child porn - but it was "incredibly inappropriate for the workplace," said one source, who would speak only on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the personnel case.

The source said as many as two dozen staffers may have received e-mails at work containing the sexually explicit images and videos, along with joking comments that some construed as racist and homophobic.

Badiner, who just last week was serving as the department's acting boss while Rahaim was on bereavement leave following the sudden death of his partner, is not believed to have sent any of the e-mails. However, he was receiving them and did nothing to stop their circulation, city officials believe, and stands to lose his $154,000-a-year job.

City higher-ups got wind of the office raunchiness in December when a female employee filed a whistle-blower complaint, saying she had received numerous offensive e-mails.

The city's human resources director, Micki Callahan, immediately contacted Rahaim and opened an investigation zeroing in on the zoning section that Badiner oversees.

Last week, we're told, Rahaim filed formal charges seeking to dismiss Badiner and three other senior planners - one of them a woman.

Under civil service rules, the four are entitled to disciplinary hearings, and they could fight the charges.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: eurofrisco; lavendermafia; leftcoast; partner; pornification; sanctuary; sanfranciscovalues; sanfransicko; surfingporn; workplaceporn; yourtaxdollarsatwork
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
San Francisco + porn + probe

Any questions?

1 posted on 05/05/2010 7:49:42 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Hope I don’t get banned, but, this is San Francisco. If it was man/woman activity, then the guys are in trouble. But if it was man/man, shall we say, then that infraction is a minor one, along the lines of checking your personal e-mail at work.


2 posted on 05/05/2010 7:51:36 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Or was it Donnie Does Dallas?


3 posted on 05/05/2010 7:52:31 AM PDT by Defiant (At what point will average Democrats say their leaders have gone too far? Is there any limit?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Anyone want to know why California is SO blanked up. San Francisco was the cradle of the State.


4 posted on 05/05/2010 7:53:13 AM PDT by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Just a bunch of leftists practicing the sexual harassment that Americans won’t.


5 posted on 05/05/2010 7:55:23 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

maybe they pretend they’re greek rioters if they get canned...


6 posted on 05/05/2010 7:55:49 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ("The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants"-Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB

They’ll be hired by the SEC.


7 posted on 05/05/2010 7:58:19 AM PDT by jazminerose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

It’s a good thing this article considers this a bad thing. In SF they prob are shocked anyone feels its a problem.


8 posted on 05/05/2010 8:00:18 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
It could be more than a minor infraction:my workplace has a written ,published policy stating that compouters are for business use only and more than a dozen workers with decades of seniority lost their jobs over porn viewing.They are still gone and it has been a couple of years.

People are paid to do a job, not view porn or shop online or write their novel.

9 posted on 05/05/2010 8:00:33 AM PDT by hoosierham (Waddaya mean Freedom isn't free ?;will you take a credit card?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Badiner’s facebook page links to a pol who wants to boycott AZ over the immigration bill.


10 posted on 05/05/2010 8:02:18 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Duhhhhhhhh for me.....What the heck is Debbie does Dallas?


11 posted on 05/05/2010 8:03:37 AM PDT by shiva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosierham

You’re right about personal use of business computers. I was being flippant and sarcastic.


12 posted on 05/05/2010 8:03:44 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
joking comments that some construed as racist and homophobic.

This, plus the fact that they were probably viewing heterosexual material, is the real concern. This is San Francisco, after all.

If a bunch of homosexuals were watching gay porn and making "breeder" jokes, there wouldn't be a problem.

13 posted on 05/05/2010 8:08:48 AM PDT by Disambiguator (Progressivism, Socialism, Marxism, Communism - it's all shades of black.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
This story is obviously bogus. No public official in SFO in recent memory has been watching "Debbie Does Dallas."
14 posted on 05/05/2010 8:12:20 AM PDT by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

In Frisco it was more like Brucie does Dallas!


15 posted on 05/05/2010 8:31:35 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The material wasn't criminal - we're talking "Debbie Does Dallas" stuff

In San Francisco? Are they SURE it wasn't washroom sex and "cruising" videos?

16 posted on 05/05/2010 8:32:13 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The hysteria of Matthewsism and Andersonism has led to a Tea Party Scare that is unAmerican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Interestingly enough, all of the management computer forensics requests that I've had to handle, have involved, erm, "deviant" surfing. I can't think of a single case that I'd call, for lack of a better word, "normal" - ie, some guy checking out nekkid chicks online.

Almost all of the cases involved gay men in one form or another. The psychologist in me wonders if it's an impulse control issue, or something.

There were a couple of cases - not involving gay men - that decorum prevents me from discussing. Stuff that just made me go, "Yick".

Then there was the guy who had thousands (10s of thousands, more like) of pictures of naked Barbie Dolls in various suggestive poses. Not really sure what category to file that one under. You can make up yer own. :-)

17 posted on 05/05/2010 8:40:21 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: shiva
"Debbie Does Dallas" was a porn video that was popular back in the 70s or early 80s.

You ain't missing much.

18 posted on 05/05/2010 8:42:28 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

San Francisco has the distinction of having a mega porn studio that is officially on the list of U.S. National Register of Historic Places

19 posted on 05/05/2010 9:12:48 AM PDT by oyez (The difference in genius and stupidity is that genius has it limits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Guess who dropped by?


20 posted on 05/05/2010 11:02:04 AM PDT by Liz (If teens can procreate in a Volkswagen, why does a spotted owl need 2000 acres? JD Hayworth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson