Posted on 05/07/2010 8:52:33 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement
TAMPA — Angel Yulee Adams told a judge Tuesday that she is not expecting her 16th child.
"No, I am not pregnant," she said. "No, my children have not been around any men other than their fathers."
The revelations came too late.
After refusing to answer a judge's questions last week, the homeless mother landed in jail, lost custody of her 12 minor children and missed out on the chance to move into a rent-free, six-bedroom home.
By the time Adams arrived in court Tuesday, Circuit Judge Tracy Sheehan was ready to release her from jail no matter what she had to say.
(Excerpt) Read more at tampabay.com ...
She was getting $2,600 a month in support and was still bitchen about nobody helping her.
In and out.... thats what got her into this position, sorry, in the first place.
“No, my children have not been around any men other than their fathers.”
Just how many “fathers” are we talking about here?
Apparently she’s not too fond of work. But I do know ONE thing she likes to do!
Upon viewing the video I was shocked and stunned to learn that she is an Obama voter.
No....really I was.
A democrats idea of perfection...a black welfare mom churning our more democrat voters.
Tubes.
Tied.
Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet. I'm doing some thing wrong. I want one of those...and a pony.
Have little democrats, vote, and collect. What a job. She is a one woman voter turnout machine.
Listen to those statements with proper English grammar. How much do you want to bet she was reading prepared statements by her attorney, and not speaking for herself?
at most 15, so it’s not that bad
/sarc
I’m really not comfortable with the idea because I don’t want the government managing who gets to give birth or not, but I can see how it would be tempting for some to advocate for a couple of things:
- those who are on welfare should not have the vote
- those who have more babies while on welfare should have increased benefits contingent upon being medically rendered incapable of having more [both mother and father] or that any new babies are automatically taken away.
Again, I’m personally not comfortable with this, but can see how it would be tempting to advocate it...
No need for a picture.
Guilty!
- those who are on welfare should not have the vote
- those who have more babies while on welfare should have increased benefits contingent upon being medically rendered incapable of having more [both mother and father] or that any new babies are automatically taken away.
add;
-those receiving welfare are to be drug screened, at a lab, in full view of lab personell to discourage cheating.
“those receiving welfare are to be drug screened, at a lab, in full view of lab personell to discourage cheating.”
Oh, yes. And those who come up dirty have their benefits terminated and kids taken away.
12 kids eat a lot. not to mention clothes, but I think she should find a job not leach
Tubes tied
No- you mean tubal ligation. Tied may or may not be permanent. Ligated yes.
Total.
Hysterectomy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.