Posted on 05/09/2010 3:13:37 PM PDT by LeoWindhorse
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has joined Kanaka Maoli, and other community representatives in criticizing the Armys radiation monitoring plan for Depleted Uranium (DU) contamination at the Pohakuloa Training Area (PTA) in the center of Hawaii Island.
In an article written by Alan D. McNarie for the Big Island Weekly NCR to ARMY: DU Monitoring Plan Wont Work the NRC said: We have concluded that the Plan will provide inconclusive results for the U.S. Army as to the potential impact of the dispersal of depleted uranium (DU) while the Pohakuloa Training Area is being utilized for aerial bombardment or other training exercises, wrote Rebecca Tadesse, Chief of the NRCs Materials Decommissioning Branch, in a recent letter to Lt. General Rick Lynch, who heads the Armys Installation Management Command.
The article went on to say The Armys handling of the DU issue at Pohakuloa is also drawing fire from some independent experts, including retired army doctor Lorrin Pang, Los Alamos National Laboratory consultant Dr. Marshall Bland, and Dr. Michael Reimer, a retired geologist with a background in radiation monitoring. And Sierra Club researcher Cory Harden has used recently released Army documents to challenge the Armys own estimates of how much DU may have been released into the environment at Pohakuloa.
The NRC review seems to vindicate Dr. Pang and myself for claiming that the monitoring was insufficient, Reimer told BIW.
Dr. Reimer said, Five-micron size [particles] would fall out within a mile. Smaller sizes may be carried by the wind. He recommended .45-micron instead of 5 micron filters to detect radiation possibly moving off base. Someone compared the Armys flawed efforts to using tennis rackets to catch BBs. Others say that reported cancer clusters down wind of PTA need to be investigated further.
[read more at anti-military website given]
(Excerpt) Read more at malu-aina.org ...
We need you help to ascertain if the NRC position they are crowing about here is factual or tiled with their disinformation spin ?
Your Freeper assistance is greatly appreciated , in advance !
The Army stated to the Dept of Health Environmental Chief that inhaled DU (from exploding weaponry) was not a worry since DU is heavier than air and would not become airborne, therefore not inhaled
The Army is killing itself with quotes like these.
>>The Army stated to the Dept of Health Environmental Chief that inhaled DU (from exploding weaponry) was not a worry since DU is heavier than air and would not become airborne, therefore not inhaled
>
>The Army is killing itself with quotes like these.
Dust is heavier than air, which is why it collects on things... according to the Army I can’t inhale it.
People with dust allergies may rest easy knowing this.
[/sarc]
Thanks LeoWindhorse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.