Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Nominee, Elena Kagan, a Moonbat
RochesterConservative.com ^ | rochester_veteran05/12/2010

Posted on 05/12/2010 7:03:16 AM PDT by rochester_veteran

A few days ago, I was talking about Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan, with my wife. It’s pretty obvious that Obama was going to pick liberals for Supreme Court seats and Kagan certainly fits that bill. I told my wife that maybe it’s best that Republicans just accept that fact and let Kagan slide into the seat. Now I’m glad they didn’t.

As it turns out, we’re finding out that she’s a lesbian. I don’t have an issue with that in itself, that’s her business, whatever floats her boat. The problem I have with her is that when she was Dean of Harvard Law School, she banned military recruiters from the school, reportedly due to the “Don’t ask don’t tell” policy of homosexuals in the military. That action tells us that she’s an idealogue with an agenda and that she’s also a moonbat, right up there with Medea Benjamin and Code Pink!

(Excerpt) Read more at rochesterconservative.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: gayagenda; ideologue; liberal; painfullygrotesque
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
As a military veteran, I feel it would be a slap in the face to all veterans if anti-military moonbat Elena Kagan is confirmed for the Supreme Court seat!
1 posted on 05/12/2010 7:03:16 AM PDT by rochester_veteran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rochester_veteran

“As a military veteran, I feel it would be a slap in the face...”

The election of Boy-Blunder was the ultimate slap in the face to patriots - everything since then is just aftershocks.


2 posted on 05/12/2010 7:09:23 AM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rochester_veteran

I personally don’t want a queer on the Supreme Court.


3 posted on 05/12/2010 7:14:22 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thethirddegree

Do we kno what team Kagen plays for?


4 posted on 05/12/2010 7:19:18 AM PDT by ncfool (The new USSA - United Socialst States of AmeriKa. Welcome to Obummers world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rochester_veteran
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

From David Horowitz's
FrontPageMag.com/DiscoverTheNetworks.org

PROFILE: ELENA KAGAN

As an undergraduate at Princeton, Kagan wrote a senior thesis titled

"To the Final Conflict: Socialism in New York City, 1900-1933."

In the "Acknowledgments" section of her work, she specifically thanked her brother Marc, “whose involvement in radical causes led me to explore the history of American radicalism in the hope of clarifying my own political ideas.” In the body of the thesis, Kagan wrote:

"In our own times, a coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States. Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalism’s glories than of socialism’s greatness. Conformity overrides dissent; the desire to conserve has overwhelmed the urge to alter. Such a state of affairs cries out for explanation. Why, in a society by no means perfect, has a radical party never attained the status of a major political force? Why, in particular, did the socialist movement never become an alternative to the nation’s established parties?...

"Through its own internal feuding, then, the SP [Socialist Party] exhausted itself forever and further reduced labor radicalism in New York to the position of marginality and insignificance from which it has never recovered. The story is a sad but also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialism’s decline, still wish to change America. Radicals have often succumbed to the devastating bane of sectarianism; it is easier, after all, to fight one’s fellows than it is to battle an entrenched and powerful foe. Yet if the history of Local New York shows anything, it is that American radicals cannot afford to become their own worst enemies. In unity lies their only hope."

Lots more on Kagan here:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2398


5 posted on 05/12/2010 7:20:18 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncfool

I think its called the Lickety -Splits.


6 posted on 05/12/2010 7:22:08 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rochester_veteran
“As a military veteran.....”
ME TOO!! No one who tried to or did eliminate military recruitment/ROTC from the college campuses should ever be considered, much less nominated to the Supreme Court.
I will advise our crapper Senators Schumer and Gilliband, not that they care a wit.
I quit the American Legion because they accepted Clinton without comment and don't expect the organization to voice any position re Kagan. Too bad.
Military: good enough to die for you but not be allowed to visit your campuses. Rudyard Kipling had it right in “Tommy”.
7 posted on 05/12/2010 7:35:14 AM PDT by BilLies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BilLies

Isn’t the American Legion primarily interested in obtaining various kinds of federal subsidies, rather than promoting patriotism, etc.


8 posted on 05/12/2010 7:39:34 AM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rochester_veteran

“I told my wife that maybe it’s best that Republicans just accept that fact and let Kagan slide into the seat.”

I don’t understand this attitude. I stand opposed to everything that the dhimmicrats wish to impose upon us and especially judges. It may be proforma for each side to “get” the nominee of their choice, but it is our duty to make sure that the ideologues and their agendas are exposed and that no one has any pretensions about what they’re up to.


9 posted on 05/12/2010 7:40:58 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Absolutely not.


10 posted on 05/12/2010 7:45:32 AM PDT by PJammers (I can't help it... It's my idiom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rochester_veteran
Our King has spoken. She looks like the same empty suit as King Obama. It is his communists Administration and outside criminals that are controlling America. King Obama is just a empty headed puppet, and this Kagan, I fear, is the same. Some people can appear intellectual sound but are just talking points learned by their real leaders and were pumped through a sick educational system.
11 posted on 05/12/2010 8:10:39 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rochester_veteran

The fact that this criminal she-man is solicitor general of The United States is shocking and a symptom of a very sick government. If the US Constitution is only as durable as each power addicted career politician wants it to be it may as well be written on Play-doh. We are in a constitutional crisis with only the cowardly republicans to act on behalf of the people. Translation: We are losing what little liberty we have left.


12 posted on 05/12/2010 8:19:56 AM PDT by Binstence (Live Freep or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rochester_veteran
She called the carefully crafted rules “a moral injustice of the first order”

This lady is a crusader for "social justice."

Our Constitution is a compact to secure our unalienable rights. It cannot legitimately be used to impose social justice.

Kagan should not be allowed anywhere near our precious Constitution.

13 posted on 05/12/2010 8:28:01 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Tyrants should fear for their personal safety.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rochester_veteran
I don't think the circumstances behind the recruiting story are as cut and dried as it seems...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703880304575236502953055276.html?mod=WSJ_newsreel_opinion

Read it and decide for yourself.

We're gonna get a lefty...we don't have the votes to stop it. The question I have is, if we use all our ammo to take this one out, how much better or worse will the next one be?

I just want to be factual in our criticism.

14 posted on 05/12/2010 8:30:28 AM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thethirddegree

Obama doesn’t care what we think and the republicans won’t even ask her about it. Just another slap in the face to Christians in America.


15 posted on 05/12/2010 8:34:58 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rockrr

I am more concerned with her socialist beliefs.

“In our own times, a coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States. Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalism’s glories than of socialism’s greatness.”
— Elena Kagan, Obama nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court


16 posted on 05/12/2010 8:36:15 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man
I don't think the circumstances behind the recruiting story are as cut and dried as it seems...

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703880304575236502953055276.html?mod=WSJ_newsreel_opinion

Even after reading the above article, I'm not swayed from my opinion that Kagan is a moonbat.

The article kind of reminded me of the justifications that a few of the big guns in Oath Keepers had for supporting Adam Kokesh in his run for the Congressional seat in New Mexico, that because Kokesh is supposedly a Constitutionalist, that this somehow justified the maligning his fellow veterans and active duty military that he did when he was one of the leaders in the IVAW.

Kagan is an ideologue who has an social agenda of pushing gay rights and she's a moonbat for instituting the anti recruiter policy, regardless if it was a carry over from previous policy. For gosh sakes, she went as far as seeking to overturn the Solomon Amendment, a law that denies federal funding to any university that bars military recruiters from its campus. That speaks volumes!

17 posted on 05/12/2010 9:25:34 AM PDT by rochester_veteran ( http://RochesterConservative.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

I guess I wrapped that into my “agenda” statement. I agree with you. It is part & parcel of her “grand social experiment” that includes not just “social justice” and creative reparations, but the soft-Facism favored by Øbozo.

Some here seem to be saying that we should save our ammo for a more important fight but I’m more inclined to fight them at every turn. The neat thing about “bullets” is that if you’re running low you can always make more...


18 posted on 05/12/2010 9:28:44 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rochester_veteran
But the article concludes, "But it would be very wrong to portray Elena Kagan as hostile to the U.S. military. Quite the opposite is true."

If they say it then it must be true.....right?!

19 posted on 05/12/2010 9:31:18 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
I don’t understand this attitude. I stand opposed to everything that the dhimmicrats wish to impose upon us and especially judges. It may be proforma for each side to “get” the nominee of their choice, but it is our duty to make sure that the ideologues and their agendas are exposed and that no one has any pretensions about what they’re up to.

Understood and that's pretty much how I feel, but the point I was making was, Obama is going to nominate a liberal to Supreme Court openings, no matter what. Initially, I didn't really know much about Kagan, but now that I do, I oppose her nomination.

20 posted on 05/12/2010 9:32:30 AM PDT by rochester_veteran ( http://RochesterConservative.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson