Posted on 05/12/2010 7:03:16 AM PDT by rochester_veteran
A few days ago, I was talking about Supreme Court nominee, Elena Kagan, with my wife. Its pretty obvious that Obama was going to pick liberals for Supreme Court seats and Kagan certainly fits that bill. I told my wife that maybe its best that Republicans just accept that fact and let Kagan slide into the seat. Now Im glad they didnt.
As it turns out, were finding out that shes a lesbian. I dont have an issue with that in itself, thats her business, whatever floats her boat. The problem I have with her is that when she was Dean of Harvard Law School, she banned military recruiters from the school, reportedly due to the Dont ask dont tell policy of homosexuals in the military. That action tells us that shes an idealogue with an agenda and that shes also a moonbat, right up there with Medea Benjamin and Code Pink!
(Excerpt) Read more at rochesterconservative.com ...
“As a military veteran, I feel it would be a slap in the face...”
The election of Boy-Blunder was the ultimate slap in the face to patriots - everything since then is just aftershocks.
I personally don’t want a queer on the Supreme Court.
Do we kno what team Kagen plays for?
From David Horowitz's
FrontPageMag.com/DiscoverTheNetworks.org
PROFILE: ELENA KAGAN
As an undergraduate at Princeton, Kagan wrote a senior thesis titled
"To the Final Conflict: Socialism in New York City, 1900-1933."
In the "Acknowledgments" section of her work, she specifically thanked her brother Marc, whose involvement in radical causes led me to explore the history of American radicalism in the hope of clarifying my own political ideas. In the body of the thesis, Kagan wrote:
"In our own times, a coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States. Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalisms glories than of socialisms greatness. Conformity overrides dissent; the desire to conserve has overwhelmed the urge to alter. Such a state of affairs cries out for explanation. Why, in a society by no means perfect, has a radical party never attained the status of a major political force? Why, in particular, did the socialist movement never become an alternative to the nations established parties?...
"Through its own internal feuding, then, the SP [Socialist Party] exhausted itself forever and further reduced labor radicalism in New York to the position of marginality and insignificance from which it has never recovered. The story is a sad but also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialisms decline, still wish to change America. Radicals have often succumbed to the devastating bane of sectarianism; it is easier, after all, to fight ones fellows than it is to battle an entrenched and powerful foe. Yet if the history of Local New York shows anything, it is that American radicals cannot afford to become their own worst enemies. In unity lies their only hope."Lots more on Kagan here:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2398
I think its called the Lickety -Splits.
Isn’t the American Legion primarily interested in obtaining various kinds of federal subsidies, rather than promoting patriotism, etc.
“I told my wife that maybe its best that Republicans just accept that fact and let Kagan slide into the seat.”
I don’t understand this attitude. I stand opposed to everything that the dhimmicrats wish to impose upon us and especially judges. It may be proforma for each side to “get” the nominee of their choice, but it is our duty to make sure that the ideologues and their agendas are exposed and that no one has any pretensions about what they’re up to.
Absolutely not.
The fact that this criminal she-man is solicitor general of The United States is shocking and a symptom of a very sick government. If the US Constitution is only as durable as each power addicted career politician wants it to be it may as well be written on Play-doh. We are in a constitutional crisis with only the cowardly republicans to act on behalf of the people. Translation: We are losing what little liberty we have left.
This lady is a crusader for "social justice."
Our Constitution is a compact to secure our unalienable rights. It cannot legitimately be used to impose social justice.
Kagan should not be allowed anywhere near our precious Constitution.
Read it and decide for yourself.
We're gonna get a lefty...we don't have the votes to stop it. The question I have is, if we use all our ammo to take this one out, how much better or worse will the next one be?
I just want to be factual in our criticism.
Obama doesn’t care what we think and the republicans won’t even ask her about it. Just another slap in the face to Christians in America.
I am more concerned with her socialist beliefs.
“In our own times, a coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States. Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalism’s glories than of socialism’s greatness.”
— Elena Kagan, Obama nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703880304575236502953055276.html?mod=WSJ_newsreel_opinion
Even after reading the above article, I'm not swayed from my opinion that Kagan is a moonbat.
The article kind of reminded me of the justifications that a few of the big guns in Oath Keepers had for supporting Adam Kokesh in his run for the Congressional seat in New Mexico, that because Kokesh is supposedly a Constitutionalist, that this somehow justified the maligning his fellow veterans and active duty military that he did when he was one of the leaders in the IVAW.
Kagan is an ideologue who has an social agenda of pushing gay rights and she's a moonbat for instituting the anti recruiter policy, regardless if it was a carry over from previous policy. For gosh sakes, she went as far as seeking to overturn the Solomon Amendment, a law that denies federal funding to any university that bars military recruiters from its campus. That speaks volumes!
I guess I wrapped that into my “agenda” statement. I agree with you. It is part & parcel of her “grand social experiment” that includes not just “social justice” and creative reparations, but the soft-Facism favored by Øbozo.
Some here seem to be saying that we should save our ammo for a more important fight but I’m more inclined to fight them at every turn. The neat thing about “bullets” is that if you’re running low you can always make more...
If they say it then it must be true.....right?!
Understood and that's pretty much how I feel, but the point I was making was, Obama is going to nominate a liberal to Supreme Court openings, no matter what. Initially, I didn't really know much about Kagan, but now that I do, I oppose her nomination.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.