Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TN: Single Dad Stops Adoption; To Get Custody of Daughter
Fathers & Families, Inc. ^ | May 13, 2010 | Robert Franklin, Esq.

Posted on 05/13/2010 12:26:33 PM PDT by fathers1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

1 posted on 05/13/2010 12:26:34 PM PDT by fathers1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fathers1

Parental rights has always meant the Mother’s rights. It’s about time Father’s rights were figured into the equation.


2 posted on 05/13/2010 12:28:39 PM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fathers1
It is unfortunate that, due to Mother's blatant and calculated lies, the Child has been living with prospective adoptive parents and forming a bond with them and that relationship must now come to an end through no fault of the prospective adoptive parents.

Why must the relationship now end? Are adoptive parents not as good as bio parents?

Prosecute the mother for her fraud, but do not harm the child by removing it from who it considers to be its parents.

3 posted on 05/13/2010 12:30:08 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (Flame away...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic of Texas

Traditionally, until the mid 20th century, the father’s rights were always supreme. Why do you think it changed? What would be the proper balance?


4 posted on 05/13/2010 12:31:15 PM PDT by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario
Why do you think it changed?

The modern 'feminist' movement.

5 posted on 05/13/2010 12:34:58 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario

The Women’s movement. Liberalism. Proper balance? 50/50. No adoption without both parents approval.


6 posted on 05/13/2010 12:35:51 PM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fathers1

This is so sad. I feel sorry for the little girl and her adoptive parents. they are the victims of that awful “Mother”. I hope Father can get this kid the help she needs because she is going to need it.


7 posted on 05/13/2010 12:41:09 PM PDT by Cheesel (So this how democracy dies...with thunderous applause, March 21, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
Why must the relationship now end? Are adoptive parents not as good as bio parents?

Not if they are involved in stealing a child from it's father (no matter how mislead they may be)

Prosecute the mother for her fraud, but do not harm the child by removing it from who it considers to be its parents.

and kick the dad in the nuts for good measure as you steal his child.

The only thing we have in this world that lasts is our children. Those of us who want them should never have our kids ripped away from us (assuming of course that we are being good parents which most men in this situation are or would be)

I'm all for adoption in cases where the biological parent doesn't want the child. But in this case the bio parent DOES want the child.

8 posted on 05/13/2010 12:42:24 PM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fathers1

The solution to this problem is Christ. The more kids have a personal relationship with Him the less outside of marriage sex there would be. The less outside of marriage sex means less babies born into these types of situations. Unfortunate all around.


9 posted on 05/13/2010 12:43:01 PM PDT by Halls (Jesus is my Lord and Savior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

Depending on the age of the child, it’s not going to harm the child near as much as it would harm the father...


10 posted on 05/13/2010 12:46:31 PM PDT by babygene (Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

So true. I believe both sperm and egg donors are selfish.


11 posted on 05/13/2010 12:47:50 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

I agree. The judge should have ruled that the child should stay with his adoptive parents. Maybe the biological father should have been given visitation rights, but the child should have not been removed from his home and parents. And, yes, the mother should face criminal charges.

What a heartbreaking story. Imagine having your two-year-old child removed from your home after you and your spouse have been raising him since he was a day old. My youngest daughter is a bit over 1 and 1/2 years old and I’d flee the country rather than give her up if they found out that there was a mix-up at the hospital or something.


12 posted on 05/13/2010 12:49:12 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

“Why must the relationship now end? Are adoptive parents not as good as bio parents?”

Not a biological father who fought tooth and nail to secure his child, no. If the adoptive parents truly loved the child, they would have set out to foster a relationship with the biological father during the years this matter was before the courts.


13 posted on 05/13/2010 12:50:10 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: babygene

Perhaps the father can find a way to include the “almost” adoptive parents in the child’s life.


14 posted on 05/13/2010 12:50:18 PM PDT by cjshapi (Proudly posting without a tagline since 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

This matter was before the courts essentially since the child was born.

The adoptive parents were selfish and unreasonable to not return the child to her father years ago.


15 posted on 05/13/2010 12:52:20 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive

The child does have a father and that never changed.

You are right adoptive pares do NOT equal biological parents. It is no different than kidnapping and then saying the stealing people are better parents and therefore the theft should be ratified.

Adoption is a legal fiction created by statute. In a day when children are/were deemed property.

The state should never get involved in terminating parental rights via a court case founded on a lie.


16 posted on 05/13/2010 12:52:22 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fathers1

One of the primary reasons I stopped doing family law: everybody hurts everybody and the kids suffer. Best I could tell, there was never a true winner in any of my cases.

Colonel, USAFR


17 posted on 05/13/2010 12:52:27 PM PDT by jagusafr (Don't make deals with pirates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fathers1

The double standard says any child support required of the mother will never have to be paid.


18 posted on 05/13/2010 12:53:15 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

He’s hardly a mere donor; he would be the only father the child ever knew if the biological mother wasn’t evil.


19 posted on 05/13/2010 12:54:16 PM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca

Doesn’t the adopted parents have custody right now? I believe they are the real parents now.


20 posted on 05/13/2010 12:55:46 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson