Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman's hospital memories contradict "birthers"
The Daily Republic ^ | May 15, 2010 | Ross Dolan

Posted on 05/14/2010 11:02:15 PM PDT by Smokeyblue

U.S. House candidate Chris Nelson earlier this week dismissed “birther” statements attributed to him and said he believes Barack Obama is a natural-born U.S. citizen and the legitimately elected president of the United States.

So does Eleanor Nordyke — and according to her, she should know.

Nordyke, 82, of Honolulu, Hawaii, says that on Aug. 4, 1961, she was in labor with her twin daughters Susan and Gretchen at Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital — the same place Barack Obama was being born. The hospital has since been renamed Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women and Children.

“Birthers” is the term given to those who believe Obama was not born in the United States and does not, therefore, meet a primary qualification for the presidency.

Nordyke, in a Friday telephone interview with The Daily Republic, said the birthers have consistently discounted her testimony. She is certain they are wrong.

(Excerpt) Read more at mitchellrepublic.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: article2section1; birthcertificate; certifigate; eligibility; hawaii; honolulu; ineligible; naturalborncitizen; nordyke; obama; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-218 last
To: taxesareforever
82 years old and remembers who was being born in the same hospital as the one she was giving birth to?

That may be the reporter's sloppiness.

Mrs. Nordyke was talking about things that have been discussed in recent days, but the reporter writes that she "recalls" things she almost certainly didn't know at the time.

Essentially, there isn't any story or any authoritative information here, but the reporter is trying to make it look like Mrs. Nordyke has valuable first-hand evidence (which she just doesn't have).

201 posted on 05/17/2010 4:11:53 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

True.

I have no idea who had babies when I had mine.

I do know that Jimmy Carter’s neice (or something) was in labor the same time I was with my first baby. I only know because my sister was in the waiting room while my husband was in the back trying to shut me up. :)

“I’ve changed my mind. I don’t want it. Throw it out the window!” (Yes, I actually said that.)


202 posted on 05/17/2010 4:15:39 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

“While race seems to be an issue with birthers...”

BS article.


203 posted on 05/17/2010 4:23:51 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

The “birthers” are still awaiting plenty of other sealed and highly-protected documentation to be concerned with this analysis.


204 posted on 05/17/2010 5:24:09 PM PDT by taraytarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
"A "natural born" citizen is someone born in the US, of American parents."

Simply not true, as I've already explained. There is no such definition in US law.

205 posted on 05/17/2010 5:34:15 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
"You’re still wrong. It is NOT enough to simply be born here, especially back in 1961."

No. It is enough, and was long before 1961.

206 posted on 05/17/2010 5:34:59 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion; john mirse
Obama almost certainly stole the certificate number from a little girl who was born on Aug 4th and died the next day - probably at Kapiolani after the BC’s had already been delivered for the week. Her BC was probably put on the pile just a couple before the Nordyke twins’ were, so the Nordykes’ were processed just a couple before hers at the HDOH.

Obama could have used on his forged COLB both the certificate number and the “date filed” from the little girl’s non-certified COLB (which the HDOH was authorized to give him. They’re also authorized to give it to me, but they won’t.) If he had done so, there wouldn’t be a discrepancy between his “date filed” and the certificate number.

Thank you for your hard work and patriotism, butterdezillion.

This is a chilling tale: BO stole the paperwork of a dead child to pass off as his own.

207 posted on 05/17/2010 7:02:28 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=105347


208 posted on 05/17/2010 7:06:50 PM PDT by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mlo

The Supreme Court told us the definition of natural born citizen is extraconstitutional. It is not defined by U.S. law or the Constitution, and they proceeded to say that without doubt, it is someone born in a country to parents who are its citizens, citing the Vattel definition nearly word for word.


209 posted on 05/17/2010 7:41:30 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Kahuna

In most states, there are estate laws which require the public recording of wills and probate.

Does Hawaii have public records for the disposition of the estate of the parents and/or grandparents?


210 posted on 05/17/2010 7:45:27 PM PDT by Jude in WV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mlo
Simply not true, as I've already explained. There is no such definition in US law.

Nor is there a definition for things like "commerce", but there is a commonly understood meaning for the term, at the time it was committed, and historcal reference to support a claim that the understanding that children born on US soil to foreign parents were not "natural born citizens" at that time.

211 posted on 05/17/2010 8:30:20 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

151 1961 010641 number from FactCheck photo of Obama COLB

151 61 10637 number from photo of long form birth certificate of Susan Nordyke

Why does Obama’s number have 19 after the 151 and Nordyke’s does not?
Why does Nordyke’s have 0 in front of 10641 and Obama’s does not?


212 posted on 05/17/2010 8:42:54 PM PDT by Jude in WV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jude in WV

BECAUSE o’S IS A FAKE, OF COURSE...

:)

THEY MUST HAVE BEEN RUSHING TO GET THE JOB DONE.

LITTLE DETAILS, LITTLE DETAILS....


213 posted on 05/17/2010 9:33:19 PM PDT by bitt ("WE THE PEOPLE" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Jude in WV; BP2; butterdezillion; LucyT

SEE #207, #212


214 posted on 05/17/2010 9:34:41 PM PDT by bitt ("WE THE PEOPLE" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVAhr4hZDJE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

The “what it’s worth” question is pretty well covered by the fact that a South Dakota paper with a circulation of 12,000 landed the interview.


215 posted on 05/17/2010 10:13:21 PM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Maybe I don't remember because I have never been one to judge others.

An interracial baby would not have left an impression so neither would it's mother. I was much too involved with my own baby to pay attention to another's.

So I doubt a woman with twins would have paid much attention to another's baby or for that matter, it's mother.

216 posted on 05/19/2010 8:37:39 AM PDT by Dustbunny ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. " Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Dustbunny
Maybe I don't remember because I have never been one to judge others.

It's not a question of juding anyone, it's one of observation.

In those days, the babies were in the nursery most of the time. The mothers were in their rooms, usually two woman to a room, but sometimes it was a ward, with lots of women in the same room. Lots of time to talk, and observe the other ladies' visitors.

217 posted on 05/19/2010 9:13:54 AM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Jude in WV
Why does Obama’s number have 19 after the 151 and Nordyke’s does not? Why does Nordyke’s have 0 in front of 10641 and Obama’s does not?

Probably just the difference between the 1961 BC form and practices of 1961, and those of the COLB form and practices of 2007.

218 posted on 05/19/2010 9:15:58 AM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-218 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson