Replies

’doesn’t allow any criticism’ I think is overstating it, if people are saying that, but it certainly is true that the early adopters for Palin for POTUS 2012 community here really rally against any kind of criticism of her, even legitimate, thoughtful criticism. We should be open to constructive criticism and shouldn’t hide behind phraseology like ‘Palin haters’ without defining terms. Thanks for doing that in your second post.

I have actually seen posters write that Palin fans don't allow posters to criticize Sarah Palin. That's not the truth. It's saying Sarah Palin is the enemy that some of us argue over. It's inferring that she's a *ahem* "lady of the evening" (to put it nicely) when they post, "Did Palin get her money off the dresser after she made that endorsement?"

Those are hateful comments, not criticism on policy or ideals, IMO.

I feel like I've been saying the same things for several months now so I apologize for taking the shortcut and not making my comments clear.

“I feel like I’ve been saying the same things for several months now so I apologize for taking the shortcut and not making my comments clear.”

I think you’re being reasonable, when you sense a reasonable person on the other side. I know it’s frustrating when people just resort to course quips and name calling. I agree, that helps nothing and is juvenile.

As to saying the same things - I have a few stock quotes I pull out probably twice a week about 3rd parties and put out there. There are 300,000 people + or - on this board...so you’ll probably have to repeat yourself quite a bit!

Take good care - it looks like Sarah made some strong pro-life comments on Friday - cool!:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2513490/posts (Mama Grizzlies will take back the US.)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2514259/posts (Sister Sledgehammer)