Barack Obama’s dozens of social security numbers: there’s far more to this story than we thought

The Collins Report ^ | May 16, 2010 | Suzanne Eovaldi

[BOBTHENAILER]

Is the number 666 in there somewhere?

[bgill]

Don’t you think it is a rather interesting “coincidence” that 4 of the adresses refer to the White House, Senate, Pennsylvania Avenue, and Washington? (and those were just a few he mentioned).

With such a limited thought process, it's more proof why King Obama needs a teleprompter.

[Logical me]

And the MSM ignores it. One of these days it is going to hit the fan.

Don't bet on it. He has us by the ba!!s and will take a herculean effort to kick his a@@.

[Danae]

ROTFLMAO

[bgill]

While I believe that someone or a group has “the dirt” I don’t understand why Hillary didn’t use it if she has it.

Notice how quickly she shut up and went to eat pudding in the corner during the campaign? Someone had even bigger dirt on her. They gave her an offer she couldn't refuse - jail time or a nice cushy appointment. Which would you have chosen?

[Yardstick]

I think you’re right about the ones you’re talking about. It’s not Obama creating them, it’s hackers/illegals/goofballs.

But it is weird (if true) that Obama’s SSN is a retread of someone’s born in 1890. I also read somewhere that he received his current SSN back in 1975 in Illinos, but he was a resident of Hawaii at the time. Also he seems to have a handful of SSNs associated with known addresses where he lived when attending various universities.

So there’s some weirdness which seems trivial but other weirdness that seems more important.

[null and void]

GAH! I meant 1974, around the time of the impeachment. People who I knew damm well voted for him denied it.

[nolongerademocrat]

Hmmmm, I don’t know.

[bgill]

Perhaps but all this SS stuff is old news and has been out there since the campaign. That would have been one bored hacker to try this on a mere candidate.

[little jeremiah]

I think truth will come out, MHG - and there will be great turmoil. But it will be much better after the giant housecleaning. And deck sweeping. Natural laws at work.

[savedbygrace]

The latest I’ve been able to find is from Feb 2010, sometime during the snow storms in D. C.

[Deo volente]

What are those scars all about? I hadn’t seen that before.

[ASA Vet]

People who I knew damm well voted for him denied it.

So they claimed they'd voted for the Commie supporter?

Did you call them on that?

[null and void]

Nope. These were people I knew and had to live with, including a roommate, so I didn't push it.

Besides, I didn't vote for Nixon either.

[Joe 6-pack]

"I would think anybody savvy enough to forge such documentation, either in paper or electronically, would generally have incentive to avoid drawing attention to themselves and blend in with the crowd...If they exist, I would expect them to be electronic forgers, seeking a unique account someplace which they could easily remember..."

I'm an insurance fraud investigator and work for a national firm that does insurance defense work for multiple clients in all 50 states. By virtue of our licensure, we have access to similar, if not identical databases to the the one used by the invesstigator in this story. The data services compile info from public records, credit agencies, etc. When you run a query on an individual by SSN, it's not uncommon to get 2-3 other socials that come up as "associated with the individual". These are typically not indicator's of fraud, but may reflect a co-signer on a loan, joint property ownership, or even a data input error where two numbers get transposed...not uncommon at all. When you get more than five SSNs associated with an individual, paricularly one with a relatively unique name, that should justifiably raise a lot of questions.

As an aside, a lot of fake identities will have easily memorized data..i.e. birthdays on the 1st or 31st of the month, round years(1960, 1975, etc.)

[ASA Vet]

So you voted for the Commie supporter, or you didn't vote?
Hopefully you were not yet old enough to vote.

[nolongerademocrat]

Hmmm. I guess Bo got too big to be cute.

[null and void]

Not that it’s any of your business, but I voted for the local boy, John Schmitz.

[tacticalogic]

Is the number 666 in there somewhere?

I'll bet Louie Farrakhan could find it if he wanted to.

[little jeremiah]

People can change a lot in 37 years. I know I have! I voted against Reagan in one election, that third party guy. I was an idiot!