“Lord Monckton is one of the foremost experts on Global Warming. He knows more than any of the so called scientists do.”
You have to understand how the scientific community operates. Credibility is based on credentials. Has he published any peer reviewed scientific papers on the subject? Where were they published? Where did he do his research? Where and with who did he get his training? If he has no credentials he is just a dilettante. Someone who dabbles in the area but has no substance. Al Gore is a perfect example. If you have no credentials no scientist will take you seriously.
He has written extensively on the subject. The idea that you have to be the original researcher to understand the research is wrong.
This is a POLITICAL FIGHT now. There is no evidence of man made global warming, only half baked theories and computer ‘models’, propagated by so called scientists that are are agenda driven morons.
Yet Al Gore is the leader of the Chicken Little scientists. They never criticize his “science”, instead they give him a Nobel.
the only reason I paid any attention to his writings and comments in the beginning is because he was science advisor to Margaret Thatcher. One of the first complaints I remember from him was about global warming scientists’ lack of transparency and information about actual data.
Lord Moncton was science advisor to Margaret Thatcher’s government.
He has published extensively. By the way, Science is a structured methodology independent of subject area. There is NO science in statistics! All of the claims of the AGW are based on statistical manipulations.