Colorado: Palin 29, Romney 25, Huckabee 18

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/05/18/colorado-palin-29-romney-25-huckabee-18/ ^ | 5/18/10

[roses of sharon]

Yeah, it’s just one state, but she deserves a little free buzz after doing a nice job on the State Department’s China/Arizona fiasco. Besides, to my knowledge, this is the very first PPP poll of any kind where she’s had a lead. Sarahmentum?

[Defiant]

For reasons like this, states like Colorado will not be allowed to have primaries until the RINO is selected by open primary states.

[svcw]

Romney needs to go away. (OK, Huckabee also)

[Bob J]

69% of the liberals in this poll voted for Palin. That tells you all you need to know.

Why would liberals want Palin to run?

[Catsrus]

Maybe they underestimate her, and think she doesn’t have a chance against their marxist buddy currently usurping the office of the president.

[roses of sharon]

Why would liberals want Palin to run?

Could be because Palin is out there everyday espousing the virtues of liberalism, Marxism and Communism? Her love for leftwing dictators and hatred of Israel? Or maybe that she works hard for Obama everyday? Possibly her speaking engagements at liberal orgs? More than likely tho it is her unflinching devotion to abortion and gay rights.

[SueRae]

Most refreshing. It may only be one state poll but there will be sooooo many more. If she decides to run, I will go part time at my job to help her get elected.

[Bob J]

“Maybe they underestimate her, and think she doesn’t have a chance against their marxist buddy currently usurping the office of the president.”

Nobody is underestimating Palin. However, if by your convoluted reply you mean they think she would be the easiest GOP candidate to beat...then you would be correct.

[SeekAndFind]

[SoConPubbie]

69% of the liberals in this poll voted for Palin. That tells you all you need to know.

Cause there not too bright like many of the Anti-Palin posters on this site and believe their own garbage about how easy she will be to beat?

[SoConPubbie]

Nobody is underestimating Palin. However, if by your convoluted reply you mean they think she would be the easiest GOP candidate to beat...then you would be correct.

So you agree with the Liberals, right Bob J?

Confirming what everybody on FreeRepublic already knew.

[SoConPubbie]

Nobody is underestimating Palin. However, if by your convoluted reply you mean they think she would be the easiest GOP candidate to beat...then you would be correct.

Bob, as was pointed out to you on another thread:

Bob, why don you tell people that only 1% of the respondants in the poll were liberals?

That's 1% Bob.

[SoConPubbie]

Nobody is underestimating Palin. However, if by your convoluted reply you mean they think she would be the easiest GOP candidate to beat...then you would be correct.

Here you go Bob, straight from the source:

If the Republican candidates for President in 2012 were Newt Gingrich, Mike Huckabee, Sarah Palin, Ron Paul, and Mitt Romney who would you vote for? If Newt Gingrich, press 1. If Mike Huckabee, press 2. If Sarah Palin, press 3. If Ron Paul, press 4. If Mitt Romney, press 5. If you’re undecided, press 6 Gingrich .......................................................... 16% Huckabee........................................................ 18% Palin................................................................ 29% Paul ................................................................ 9% Romney .......................................................... 25% Undecided....................................................... 3%

Q8 If you are a liberal, press 1. If a moderate, press 2. If a conservative, press 3. Liberal ............................................................. 1% Moderate......................................................... 34% Conservative................................................... 64%

[johncocktoasten]

Bob j,

You are nothing more than a hemmoroid on the rectum of freerepublic. You are irritating, but in the end you are just covered in shit.