The Rush Limbaugh Victory

New York Times ^ | May 19, 2010 | Zev Chafets

[presently no screen name]

He doesn’t go as far right as everyone would like.

I agree but at the same time that's a good thing. If he were considered too far right (lefty term) - I doubt many of his converts would have taken him seriously. He's a good teacher.

In office we could count on him to do the will of the people - pro America. He's not a people pleaser and this would not be a career for him.

[presently no screen name]

The bad news is that without a Rush running for office, we'll never know what it would be like to have an "aggressive" conservative (vs. a "happy conservative" like Reagan

And that's just what we need now - aggressive. This country has taken a quick fall in so many areas and needs aggressive to bring it back.

[presently no screen name]

Hussein Obama” is less threat

You can't be serious. His contempt for America screams!

[Psalm 144]

Hussein Obama” is less threat

You can’t be serious. His contempt for America screams!

**********************************

True, but his incompetence roars as well.

[presently no screen name]

but his incompetence roars

He's not incompetent- he is DELIBERATE!

[carjic]

Dittos Rush!

[Psalm 144]

He’s not incompetent- he is DELIBERATE!

*********************************

In BO I see an utter incompetent who has brought the entirety of post-WWII liberalism to the chopping block. See my tagline.

Hillary’s policies would have been just as malignant, but executed with more skill, subtlety, persuasion, permanence and lethality.

Thus I stated and maintain that the election of Hillary would have been worse than the election of BO. Ambivalent about the Great White Quisling, a/k/a “The Maverick” McCain.

YMMV.