Skip to comments.
'I'm a Marxist' says Dalai Lama, but agrees capitalism has helped China
AFP ^
| May 20, 2010
Posted on 05/20/2010 4:02:05 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
TIBETAN spiritual leader the Dalai Lama says he's a Marxist, yet credits capitalism for bringing new freedoms to China, the communist country that exiled him.
"Still I am a Marxist," the exiled Tibetan Buddhist leader said in New York, where he arrived today with an entourage of robed monks and a heavy security detail to give a series of paid public lectures.
"(Marxism has) moral ethics, whereas capitalism is only how to make profits," the Dalai Lama, 74, said.
However, he credited China's embrace of market economics for breaking communism's grip over the world's most populous country and forcing the ruling Communist Party to "represent all sorts of classes".
"(Capitalism) brought a lot of positive to China. Millions of people's living standards improved," he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.com.au ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: buddhism; ccp; china; dalailama; marxism; tibet
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-123 next last
To: Free ThinkerNY
"(Marxism has) moral ethics, whereas capitalism is only how to make profits,"
That statement is so utterly wrong, it's not even funny. And the fact that the Dalai Lama would say it indicates that he's nothing more than just another clay-foot sod, just like the rest of us, and not some incarnation of a divinity.
Let's start with the historical, shall we? There's a little website I like to visit when questions like this come up that has a pretty decent evaluation of the sources and statistics for human megadeaths:
http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstats.htm
According to this website, the "big four" are WWI, WWII (no surprises there), China and Russia. The last two, of course, have one big aspect in common - they've both been run by Marxists.
Based on the statistics surveyed by the author of this site, focusing only on the ideological/political battles involved, and excluding deaths due to the world wars, and rounding to the hundred thousands, Marxists and Marxism have been responsible for approximately 71,500,000 deaths in the Twentieth Century. That's correct, folks, seventy-one million, five hundred-thousand deaths can be laid at the feet of Marxists and Marxism, and what's more, those deaths can be attributed, in whole or in part, precisely to the political ideologies of Marxism.
Capitalism doesn't even come close.
If that constitutes "moral ethics" then I, for one, believe that "moral ethics" should be treated as tantamount to crimes against humanity.
But, beyond the merely factual, there's the theory and philosophy of it. Marxism has a calloused, arrogant disregard for the individual. "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need" - as measured and determined by someone other than the individual whose abilities and needs are in question. As such, once the Marxist powers-that-be have "determined" the abilities and needs of a given individual, that individual no longer has any say or control over how his or her abilities are to be employed - they must, under pain of physical punishment, be employed in the manner the Marxist powers-that-be have decided is in the "best interests" of the collective. Further, once an individual's needs have been "determined" by the Marxist powers-that-be, that individual has no say or control over what he or she can obtain, or not, as he or she wishes to using his or her own capabilities (which, after all, no longer belong to him or her, but to the collective, see above), but must be satisfied with what the Marxist powers-that-be have decided he or she needs - not what he or she wants, but only what they think he or she needs - and must accept what he or she is given under pain of physical punishment.
I do not believe that I mince any words when I say that Marxism is nothing more than slavery in fancy-dress clothes.
Capitalism, by comparison, holds the individual - and that individual's ability to make his or her own destiny, to decide his or her own fate, on the strength of his or her own native wits, and with the companionship of people of his or her own choosing - in the highest moral regard.
But even beyond that, Capitalism understands that one person's desires might be another's annoyance from time to time, and in the event that happens, in the first instance creates the mechanisms and procedural due-process rules necessary to assist those individuals in maximally and efficiently working out their conflict together on a voluntary basis. And, to back that process up, Capitalism has developed and deployed a whole apparatus that, fairly and justly delineates mechanisms to enforce the reasonable agreements amongst individuals in order to avoid the problems of free-ridership and faithlessness.
That, to me, is true morality; not the grotesque frauds the Marxists parade around as "moral ethics."
I wonder, has anyone pointed out to the Dalai Lama that his statement necessarily entails his affirmation of the seventy-one, plus million deaths caused - primarily for ideological reasons - by Marxism and Marxists? Is the Dalai Lama really that bloodthirsty?
61
posted on
05/20/2010 6:36:00 PM PDT
by
Oceander
(The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
"(Marxism has) moral ethics, whereas capitalism is only how to make profits," the Dalai Lama, 74, said.
This is hilarious by the way -- the hard core left hate the Dalai Lama because he's anti-gay etc.
62
posted on
05/20/2010 6:39:13 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: SunkenCiv
(Marxism has) moral ethics, whereas capitalism is only how to make profits," the Dalai Lama, 74, said.
Looks like the incarnation of the previous Dalai Lama is also an economic illiterate. Maybe the economic understanding part of his tendency to exist didn't make the transfer to the new body.
63
posted on
05/20/2010 6:49:47 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: Free ThinkerNY
Wait a minute! Does Obama know this? I bet he wouldn’t have snubbed the Dalai if he’d known he was a fellow Marxist. Such a trajedy.
64
posted on
05/20/2010 6:52:07 PM PDT
by
XenaLee
(The only good commie is a dead commie.)
To: HerrBlucher
Good one! From an appreciative person in the dollypartonesque hills of Tennessee.
65
posted on
05/20/2010 6:55:57 PM PDT
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Socialism, the gospel of envy: its inherent virtue, the equal sharing of misery. — Winston Churchil)
To: tet68
Absolutely. Marxism is evil through and through. It is a 100% evil ideology.
To: Free ThinkerNY
Then he does not believe in his own faith. The are mutually exclusive. “Religion is the opiate of the masses...”
67
posted on
05/20/2010 7:10:04 PM PDT
by
Shady
(The Fairness Doctrine is ANYTHING but fair!!!!)
To: Free ThinkerNY
This guy does know a Marxist nation occupies his homeland right?
Sweet Buddha what an ill thought out comment. I thought these folks meditated. Evidently not on world affairs.
68
posted on
05/20/2010 7:11:42 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Excusaholic: MeCain lost to Jr., RINO endorsements are flying, & you live at 2012 Denial Blvd.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
"(Marxism has) moral ethics, whereas capitalism is only how to make profits," the Dalai Lama, 74, said. LOL! What can you say. Commies hunting down his followers, muslims blow up his shrines, and this fool praises the moral ethics of.......people trying to kill him. Go back to the mountains and smoke more pot.....dumbass.
To: Free ThinkerNY
Dalai Lama is code for dumbass Tibetan.
70
posted on
05/20/2010 7:14:22 PM PDT
by
ExpatGator
(I hate Illinois Nazis!)
To: Free ThinkerNY

Carl Spackler:
So I jump ship in Hong Kong and make my way over to Tibet, and I get on as a looper at a course over in the Himalayas. A looper, you know, a caddy, a looper, a jock. So, I tell them Im a pro jock, and who do you think they give me? The Dalai Lama, himself. Twelfth son of the Lama. The flowing robes, the grace, bald
striking. So, Im on the first tee with him. I give him the driver. He hauls off and whacks one - big hitter, the Lama - long, into a ten-thousand foot crevasse, right at the base of this glacier. Do you know what the Lama says? Gunga galunga
gunga, gunga-galunga. So we finish the eighteenth and hes gonna stiff me. And I say, Hey, Lama, hey, how about a little something, you know, for the effort, you know. And he says, Oh, uh, there wont be any money, but when you die, on your deathbed, you will receive total consciousness. So I got that goin for me, which is nice.
71
posted on
05/20/2010 7:15:27 PM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Maybe his comments are too deep for me...
Look what Marxism did to your Tibet
72
posted on
05/20/2010 7:27:54 PM PDT
by
PGR88
To: Free ThinkerNY
Perhaps that explains why he sold out his fellow countrymen to Red China by declaring that Tibet DOES NOT seek independence! The Dalai Lama is a phony! He was probably a Red China puppet all along.
To: tet68
Let his marxists brothers in China eat him alive, literally.
74
posted on
05/20/2010 7:35:48 PM PDT
by
steve0
(My plan B: christianexodus.org/)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Well he’s got that going for him, which is nice.
75
posted on
05/20/2010 7:38:12 PM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(Now can we forget about that old rum-runner Joe Kennedy and his progeny of philandering drunks?)
To: aruanan
76
posted on
05/20/2010 7:54:33 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: Free ThinkerNY
"Still I am a Marxist," the exiled Tibetan Buddhist leader said in New York, where he arrived today with an entourage of robed monks and a heavy security detail to give a series of paid public lectures. "(Marxism has) moral ethics, whereas capitalism is only how to make profits," the Dalai Lama, 74, said.
Ping for later
77
posted on
05/20/2010 7:54:50 PM PDT
by
Alex Murphy
(Pretentiousness is so beneath me.)
To: Free ThinkerNY
Apparently he feels quite comfortable coming into the USA now and announcing that he is a Marxist. It’s a shame.
78
posted on
05/20/2010 8:07:34 PM PDT
by
Flint
To: silverleaf
Does he think this will get him invited to a family dinner in the WH?Lol! And it might work!
79
posted on
05/20/2010 8:32:30 PM PDT
by
ETL
(ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
To: XenaLee
Obama sees through the smokescreen.
80
posted on
05/20/2010 8:36:14 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
("Git Out The Way")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-123 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson