Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Goodbye, Employer-Sponsored Insurance
The Wall Street Journal ^ | 05-21-10 | JOHN C. GOODMAN

Posted on 05/20/2010 5:50:26 PM PDT by GOP_Lady

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: XenaLee
A liberal shot my argument down with the claim that the Republicans thought of it or presented it first.

You should have shot the leftie down with "irrelevant to the argument".

Because it was, or when it was, proposed by a Republican, does NOT mean it is Constitutional, and Constitutionality is the argument.

It only proves Republicans are inconsistent, no surprise to a conservative.

41 posted on 05/20/2010 9:00:56 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MetaThought
Employer sponsored insurance was just a metastable state.

Sure -- any third-party payer system is.

But employers invented it. Useful fringe, good inducement to recruitment/retention for family men. Tax deductible to the employer, tax-free to the employee. Best thing since sliced bread. Almost.

42 posted on 05/20/2010 9:02:06 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: XenaLee
It seems the Dems are saying that they only took the idea of government mandated insurance from the Republicans.

Obama's got a fulltime lie factory working for him, researching "talking points" and then fudging them into useful roorbacks to throw in conservatives' faces.

Like the "Teddy Roosevelt wanted national health insurance" lie. He absolutely did not -- that is a political lie of the first water, kidnapping a Rushmore face to work for the lie, and Obama repeated it at least three times if he used it once. And his MSM claque parrotted it for him like a Greek chorus, too.>

Teddy Roosevelt, as a Bull Mooser not a GOP'er, proposed as an idea that a public law establish that private employers purchase, on their own responsibility, insurance policies that amount to what we call "key man" and "income continiuation" plans. Both are common in private practice already.

Furthermore, the proposal was limited to industrial companies where lost-time accidents were more common.

Obama's slugs recanned that old proposal as a political lie.

43 posted on 05/20/2010 9:13:49 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
Postscript: The great and manly Theodore Roosevelt absolutely SPAT on scum like Barack Obama and his Marxist orcs.
44 posted on 05/20/2010 9:22:48 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
But employers invented it. Useful fringe, good inducement to recruitment/retention for family men. Tax deductible to the employer, tax-free to the employee. Best thing since sliced bread. Almost.

All fine except for the tax-free part. That keeps people tied to their employers, and is a thumb on the scale of the free market. I imagine there would be more small companies if not for the current(or rather, soon to go away!) health-insurance system.

45 posted on 05/20/2010 9:23:26 PM PDT by MetaThought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
Most liberals will see this as a GOOD thing.

In their view, the evil corporations were giving health-care perks to their rich, capitalist employees. Now, the evil corporations will instead be paying fines to mother government... which means more freebies for the deserving leftist class.

46 posted on 05/20/2010 9:31:38 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MetaThought
Point taken. But it did its job as an inducement, and to a large extent, it still does.
47 posted on 05/20/2010 9:52:16 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: american_ranger
Some background:
Back in the day -— the late 70s, the Pacific Northwest Treaty tribes had the opportunity to go that route - new age medicine was very fashionable at the time and they could have made a fortune.

However, the tribal ruling families -— the ones who get the lion's share of all money coming into a treaty tribe -— decided that quick cash was the preferred route.

There were numerous Indonesian financiers lined up to front the money for their new casinos. This allowed the ruling families to conceal who where and what about their financiers — under the phony rubric of tribal national sovereignty.

It also allowed them to put paid to the various enterprising individuals who opened cig and fireworks stands, forcing them to either reopen within a casino or pay more to the tribe as “tax”.

What happens to all the money? Usually if cash, it goes into some overstuffed closet with the rest, or into some other hidden place, or on occasion into buying a bank or two.

Very little of that money ever gets outside of the ruling families — which is why the PNW reservations are in such awlful shape. It also pays the ruling families well to keep the reservations downtrodden -— they can then point to the “needy” tribal members who need more federal dollars. Which then allows them to siphon off yet more money.

Treaty tribal casinos are a racket. Opening health care centers would fit their public image, but expose their real business to too many eyes. And that will never happen.

48 posted on 05/21/2010 3:38:26 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine .. now it is your turn..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
Let's get our terms clear regarding government health care. Obama Jr's plan is to get more Americans collecting government assistance - it is aid, NOT care. The correct word to use is Obamacaid.
49 posted on 05/21/2010 4:24:25 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

” Kinda sucks when arrogant Yacht Club ****’s want conservatives to “service” them and shut the hell up.”

Couldn’t agree more...except us conservatives, in many cases in the House and Senate, threw out the baby with the bathwater...and gave Obama the 60 votes he needed to take over health care.

So who really wins now?


50 posted on 05/21/2010 4:48:36 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BobL
....threw out the baby with the bathwater....

You talking about people like Howlin' Sphincter? Linc Chafee and Jeffords the Iscariot?

We've got Lindsey Grahamnesty still gumming up the works and making nice to the OBL. Are we ahead for having him around?

51 posted on 05/21/2010 11:16:02 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

“Are we ahead for having him around? “

Somewhat...he did vote against Obamacare, and helped to prevent a “government option” (for now), which would have been in the bill had a SINGLE Republican Senator supported it.

As to this clown himself, he needs to be TAKEN OUT in the PRIMARY. If the Republicans in SC won’t do that, then we’re stuck with him.

As to Lincoln Chaffee...agree, with a 37% ACU score, it was INSANE for Bush and the Party to EVER support him.


52 posted on 05/21/2010 6:02:44 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson