Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: B Knotts

About 1000 time better that if the communist Cruz Bustamante had won.

Let me ask you, you have deep ties in the state so leaving is hard. Hitler or Schwarzenegger? Stalin or Schwarzenegger?

Do tell. And voing third party is like voting for Hotler or Stalin.

You will not answer one or the other because you are full of .....

I voted Tom McClintock in 2003, however 2006 I voted for Schwarzenegger over the American hating socialism rat Phil Angelides.

People like you would rather throw this country down the tube by letting evil men like Barry Hussein win elections.

SAD!


257 posted on 05/25/2010 7:58:53 AM PDT by TJC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]


To: TJC

Putting in a Schwarzenegger is worse than a Bustamante. Because then you basically surrender even the possiblity of conservatism. When Bustamante fails, you can counter with “see...we need conservatism.” When Schwarzenegger fails, you have no comeback, because in the mind of the average voter GOP=conservative.

I can understand going with a more moderate candidate sometimes, because that’s all you can get, but 2003 was in particular a golden opportunity for conservatism. Instead, the country-clubbers forced their candidate in, in order to stop conservatism.

I see Fiorina somewhat in the same light.


258 posted on 05/25/2010 8:07:40 AM PDT by B Knotts (Impeach Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson