Hit job: What Media Matters and the SEIU got wrong about Fortune’s Nina Easton

the daily caller ^ | 5/26/10 | mike riggs

[Nachum]

Last week, Nina Easton, the Washington editor of Fortune, wrote a column about the SEIU and National People’s Action. The two progressive groups had sent roughly 500 protesters to Easton’s Chevy Chase neighborhood on May 16th to picket the front yard of Bank of America’s Greg Baer. Easton had just put her 2-year-old son down for a nap, and stepped outside to ask the protesters to quiet down. They didn’t. Easton wrote a column. And now she’s become the target of the SEIU and Media Matters for America.

[Buckeye McFrog]

“A Conservative is a Liberal who’se been mugged”.

Welcome to the Dark Side, Nina....

[UCFRoadWarrior]

I doubt the SEIU Klux Klan would try to pull this off in a state that isn’t gun-control

[cricket]

the bankrupt logic and votes of nice intelligent wealthy comfortable white wine libs counted just as much for what we as a nation are now enduring, as the votes of Alan Colmes and Al Sharpton

Oh, have no disagreement here per cause for our Country's devaluation. Liberalism could not be a more degraded MO. But that does not change our having to see them; hear them. Fox News, ever mindful of the gathering of totalitarian inclinations (most current effort of Lib establishment per Media - the Fairness Doctrine) feels compelled/obligated - unlike MSM outlets - to offer the Lib contrasting point of view.

Have no problem with this; while I suffer the worst of their contorted logic; those Libs tuning in, must suffer the truth.

But I do not want to suffer 'doubly' on their behalf by those who like Alan Colmes, Bob Beckel; Geraldo and a few more Libs et al at Fox News, share a similar, base-line and indeed, are too often, too painful to watch.

I can appreciate Nina; as I appreciate Greta Van Susteren; as two , while from other camp; are intelligent; polite and willing to engage and listen; adapt and grow by whatever measure.

I despise Liberalism; despise it's 'will to ignorance'; but not altogether a bad thing for Libs, not yet 'hard core'; to hear/and contrast so that they realize there IS a superior rationale at work and available.