Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Radioactive fish near Vt. nuke plant deemed common
AP ^ | May 31, 2010 | DAVE GRAM

Posted on 05/30/2010 4:39:50 PM PDT by DogByte6RER

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Hmmm...

I wonder if these fish have that fishy mackeral taste or if they taste something like a swordfish?

1 posted on 05/30/2010 4:39:50 PM PDT by DogByte6RER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Dang, I wuz going to point out that the fish are safe to eat unless they have three eyes. Pic’s already there.


2 posted on 05/30/2010 4:41:07 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Photobucket In this May 29, 2010 photo, Charles Parker remove a small fish from his line while fishing in the Connecticut River across from the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant. When a fish taken from the Connecticut River recently tested positive for radioactive strontium-90, suspicion focused on the nearby Vermont Yankee nuclear plant as the likely source. Operators of the troubled 38-year-old nuclear plant on the banks of the river, where work is under way to clean up leaking radioactive tritium, revealed this month that it also found soil contaminated with strontium-90, an isotope linked to bone cancer and leukemia. (AP Photo/Jason R. Henske)
3 posted on 05/30/2010 4:45:42 PM PDT by DogByte6RER ("Loose lips sink ships")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

If it’s a plant,
would it be a ‘red herring’?


4 posted on 05/30/2010 4:47:57 PM PDT by aumrl (let's keep it real Conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
Obligatory...


5 posted on 05/30/2010 4:48:18 PM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
Other radioactive isotopes have been found as well, including cesium-137

Cesium 137 = Chernobyl.

6 posted on 05/30/2010 4:51:40 PM PDT by denydenydeny (The welfare state turns us all into zoo animals, mouths open, waiting for the next feeding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Here comes the moratorium un nuclear power.


7 posted on 05/30/2010 4:59:32 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

This is what they served to the Mexican President, Calderone!!!!!!!!LOL!


8 posted on 05/30/2010 5:15:23 PM PDT by Doc Savage (SOBAMP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Bullcrap.

Uranium is mined and is a naturally occurring element. Also, Rock of Ages granite mine can certainly open up fissures for U-238. Nothing like MSM-based emotion-based logic.


9 posted on 05/30/2010 5:20:01 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

Strontium 90 has a half-life of about 30 years, so if you can see it, it was made within the last 300 years (it takes about 10 half-lives for an isotope to become very, very hard to detect). if you detect Sr90 it is not natural, it had to have been made by us, somewhen. Same with Cs137, it’s not natural. Most likely source is Chernobyl.

Modern gear can detect a few atoms of a radioactive substance.


10 posted on 05/30/2010 5:29:56 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

Strontium 90 has a half-life of about 30 years, so if you can see it, it was made within the last 300 years (it takes about 10 half-lives for an isotope to become very, very hard to detect). if you detect Sr90 it is not natural, it had to have been made by us, somewhen. Same with Cs137, it’s not natural. Most likely source is Chernobyl.

Modern gear can detect a few atoms of a radioactive substance.


You’re right, we should trust the governmental scientists who feed the MSM their conclusions. They don’t have any self-interest or benefit in an intended outcome, and, there’s plenty independent, 3rd parties who give us reports and double-blind proofs, etc. Sarc off. Please let’s all worship the EPA while we’re at it.


11 posted on 05/30/2010 5:36:40 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

You are suggesting a different half life for Sr90?


12 posted on 05/30/2010 5:52:09 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

It is true that EPA will lower their “standards” for a chemical if the analytical gear improves and you can “see” lower quantities.

The article says “100 times some limit” for H3, but I did not see where they mentioned Sr levels at all, just that they detected it.


13 posted on 05/30/2010 5:54:20 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

No, I’m suggesting don’t believe what you read when it is from MSM.


14 posted on 05/30/2010 5:55:46 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

I’m with you!


15 posted on 05/30/2010 5:56:32 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

How do you get tritium out of the fission of uranium?


16 posted on 05/30/2010 7:40:50 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

From lots of neutrons hitting water. Regular water yields some, heavy water (like the CANDU units) generate more.

It is a very rare fission product coming directly from U fission, but the quantity is negligible.

I think the US used to make it by bombarding lithium in reactors, we don’t any more.


17 posted on 05/30/2010 7:52:10 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
A fresher dose was released by the Chernobyl nuclear disaster in 1986.

Good, I like fresh doses in my fish.

18 posted on 05/30/2010 7:52:13 PM PDT by razorback-bert (Some days it's not worth chewing through the straps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBrow
What do you think about the “100x normal” claim? Is it believable that a leak in the cooling jacket would release that much tritium that there would be a 100x level in the wells? Maybe that might come from natural sources. Granite is famous for having trapped radioactives. I would think that any tritium produced in the cooling water would quickly go downstream.
19 posted on 05/30/2010 10:34:57 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten; DBrow
How do you get tritium out of the fission of uranium?

Apparently, by going fission in the Connecticut River.

20 posted on 05/31/2010 10:16:55 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson