Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge: Conn. town can't hold graduations in church
Republican American ^ | May 31, 2010

Posted on 06/01/2010 3:40:28 AM PDT by Man50D

BRIDGEPORT, Conn. (AP) -- A federal judge ruled Monday that two public high schools can't hold their graduations inside a church because that would be an unconstitutional endorsement of religion.

U.S. District Court Judge Janet Hall's ruling followed an Enfield school board vote in April to hold graduation ceremonies for the town's two high schools at The First Cathedral in nearby Bloomfield.

Board officials said the church, which fits 3,000 people, had enough space at the right price. Two students and three of their parents sued, claiming the decision was an unconstitutional government endorsement of religion.

The judge agreed, citing a visit to the church during which she viewed an environment "overwrought with religious symbols," including large crosses on the building's roof, over the main entrance and behind an indoor stage.

"A reasonable observer attending the 2010 Enfield graduations would perceive the message that Enfield endorsed the readily perceptible religious views of First Cathedral based upon the character of that forum which Enfield schools selected," she wrote.

A telephone call to a listing for the head of Enfield's board of education, Gregory Stokes, was not immediately returned Monday, Memorial Day.

Both high schools have held previous graduations at First Cathedral, and this year's ceremonies were scheduled for June 23 and 24. Several other Hartford-area schools also have used the church since 2001.

This year, groups including the American Civil Liberties Union of Connecticut and Americans United for Separation of Church and State warned they'd sue if Enfield didn't stop holding graduations at the church, which is about 15 miles southwest of the town.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: aclu; lawsuit; ruling; secularization
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last
To: MortMan

ahhhhhh, I was wondering.


61 posted on 06/01/2010 11:44:16 AM PDT by cdcdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
No doubt I forgot to put (/s) at the end, but you really have to infer that given the nature of this thread.

So typical of a superstition ridden and addled old federal judge to think something evil will happen if a group meets in a Catholic church.

It's just a building.

62 posted on 06/01/2010 1:03:39 PM PDT by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson