Skip to comments.
Eat less meat to save the planet - UN
Telegraph.co.uk ^
Posted on 06/02/2010 6:13:14 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: Sub-Driver
Eat less meat to save the planet - UN Why don't we drop them all in the Congo and let the cannibals eat the U.N.?
21
posted on
06/02/2010 6:30:50 AM PDT
by
MamaTexan
(Dear GOP - "We Suck Less" is ~NOT~ a campaign platform)
To: Sub-Driver
22
posted on
06/02/2010 6:31:42 AM PDT
by
DocRock
(All they that TAKE the sword shall perish with the sword. Matthew 26:52 Gun grabbers beware.)
To: Sub-Driver
Patent medicine, snake oil and Ouija boards are looked upon as reliable and legit on todays market. When in reality it is nothing but a steaming pile of rahm. These scientist jobs and the death cultures agenda must continue to support the lies...no matter what.
23
posted on
06/02/2010 6:35:32 AM PDT
by
Gasshog
(going to get what all those libs asked for, but its not what they expected.)
To: Sub-Driver
Do these idiots eat veggies at their conferences, do they ride donkeys in lieu of jets?
Lying Marxists, like Obama.
24
posted on
06/02/2010 6:45:39 AM PDT
by
wac3rd
(Prepare for the November 2010 Tsunami)
To: Dead Corpse
“Meat requires less land, meat is more nutritionally dense, meat tastes better.”
Do you have a source for this?
It seems wrong, well, the dense and tasty part is right, but I doubt it requires less land.
Beans, rice and squash would be the most efficient, with a little meat when available, I would think.
25
posted on
06/02/2010 6:53:30 AM PDT
by
Unassuaged
(I have shocking data relevant to the conversation!)
To: Sub-Driver
Just stepping out now to get a Burger
with bacon on top.
To: Sub-Driver
If bureaucracy and BS could fill an empty stomach, the UN could feed the world.
27
posted on
06/02/2010 6:54:41 AM PDT
by
anglian
To: Sub-Driver
Shutdown the defunct and inept UN and I am quite sure that will do more to save the planet than eating less meat....bet.
28
posted on
06/02/2010 7:01:42 AM PDT
by
cranked
To: Unassuaged
Pound for pound, meat requires less land. Consider how much land it would take to raise the requisite fruits and veggies to feed just your family for one year absent any meat products at all. Now consider growing chickens/cows in something other than a 100% free-range environment.
There is a reason most farms consume hundreds of acres. It takes that much to grow a decent trade crop. Most cattle/pig/fowl farms take only a fraction of that footprint. Free-range cattle take a lot of space, yes. But they don't need to...
29
posted on
06/02/2010 7:04:53 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(III, Alarm and Muster)
To: Sub-Driver
Time to get the pork butt going in the smoker. Eff the UN.
30
posted on
06/02/2010 7:08:52 AM PDT
by
GnL
To: Sub-Driver
The Government is into everything, now they want to tell me what to eat.
31
posted on
06/02/2010 7:15:46 AM PDT
by
Venturer
To: Paladin2
"Terminate the UN, with prejudice, to save the planet."Now you are talking!!
32
posted on
06/02/2010 8:57:27 AM PDT
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson