Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This is the age of war between the generations (Retiring Baby Boomers Threaten us with Bankrupcy)
The Times Online ^ | 06/03/2010 | Anatole Kaletsky

Posted on 06/03/2010 11:15:13 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: Graybeard58

I still remember the shock of my first paycheck.


61 posted on 06/03/2010 12:51:14 PM PDT by donna (The fruits of Feminism: Angry fathers, bitter mothers, fat kids and political correctness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
So how do we get the money back? Yank the cocaine out of Barney Frank's nose and sell it back to the distributor?

Not a bad start. No! Just restrict the spending and start paying it back. Just like I have to do when I have a debt.

And, those receiving the welfare freebies will have to work or go hungry. Life isn't fair, but taxing more to pay for Congresses misdeeds isn't an option. But, that is the way they will play it because no one has the gumption to step up and do things the right, honest way.

62 posted on 06/03/2010 12:51:54 PM PDT by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Parmy
That is true, but Congress has to fess up to the fact that they have been stealing the so-called trust fund to make the deficit look smaller for the past two generations.

I remember Al Gore's 2000 Presidential election debate with Bush when he kept harping about a SOCIAL SECURITY LOCK BOX ( made fun of incessantly by SNL ). Ironically, he was right.

Bush agreed with him in that debate but did nothing about it. I highly doubt that Al Gore would have done anything about this "Lockbox" had he won.
63 posted on 06/03/2010 12:52:06 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

I will certainly “accept” social security but I don’t expect it to last long. Either it will be cut off or massive inflation will destroy the value of what little I will get. If you haven’t noticed, the cost-of-living adjustments have been ended. Back in the nineties when DEflation was real and everyone was a little better off every year even with no raises the COLAs continued right along and they were uniformly upward. Now that actual inflation is biting and food and necessities are ratcheting up steadily the COLA is ended.They are preparing for the Grand Inflation and SS had to be taken off the escalator so that the government can get some “good” from the shrinking dollar welshing operation. That is how the babyboom retirement “crisis” is being “solved.” SS will be “healthy” again pretty soon but the monthly check won’t buy a night out much less pay the rent.


64 posted on 06/03/2010 1:02:24 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Nope, Barry is a member.


65 posted on 06/03/2010 1:06:11 PM PDT by Colvin (Proud Owner '66 Binder PU, '66 Binder Travelall,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: trisham

The Baby Boom lasted from 1946 until 1964 in the United States. There SHOULD have been another boom from the late 1960s through the 1990s, but there wasn’t. Some have TRIED to call late Generation X and Generation Y an “echo boom” because there was a slight increase in the birth rate, but there wasn’t. It took until 2007 for America to break the record for the number of births in a year that had been set in 1957; however, in 1957 the population was less than 180 million, compared with over 300 million in 2007.

EVERY government program that exists (Social Security, Medicare, etc.) was designed based on the assumption that birth rates would remain about the same (not the number of births, but births per 1000) and that simply hasn’t happened and nobody wants to face the fact that a civilization CANNOT survive if its population starts to shrink. Everyone wants to talk about illegal aliens, but nobody wants to consider the fact that they are here because we have created a need for them. The “elephant in the room” is that for Social Security to make it we MUST have more people paying into it and this is behind the push to legalized the illegal aliens.


66 posted on 06/03/2010 1:18:44 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Well said.


67 posted on 06/03/2010 1:21:13 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Are you telling us you won't be accepting social security? After being forced into the system?

Oh, I'll take it. If there is anything left and worth anything when I retire is another matter.
I'm in the trailing end of the baby boom. Much can go wrong before I can collect.

68 posted on 06/03/2010 2:03:21 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: algernonpj
Such as flooding the country with 20 - 40 million illegal aliens...

You got it. That's only a few. Irresponsible gov't spending is the #1 cause.
It is sucking the life out of the rest of the economy.

69 posted on 06/03/2010 2:08:15 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Goldsborough
The issue of what and what not the boomers are is way bigger than social security. You were the vector of cultural rot.

The "ME" generation has forever asked "What's in it for me?" Why would that change now? Sacrifice is an alien concept to the vat majority of your cohort and always has been.

Inflammatory insults delivered to people you know nothing about does not speak well for your level of intelligence.

70 posted on 06/03/2010 2:52:25 PM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: moose-matson
My dad is 59 and has been paying FICA since 1968. He has never taken a dime from any level of the government. I want to see him get back what he put in. Those of my generation who want to screw the boomers lack character.

My children range from -2 weeks to 17. We homeschool and will never take a dime from any level of government. I don't want them to suffer the continuation of these future murdering ponzi-schemes of SocialistSecurity and Mediscare. You pay your dad what you think you owe him and I'll do the same with mine and lets leave our children out of this.

71 posted on 06/03/2010 2:54:46 PM PDT by Theophilus (Not merely prolife, but prolific!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
I'm in the trailing end of the baby boom. Much can go wrong before I can collect.

I'm on the leading edge of X. The sooner the lies die the better off we all we be. Please God, let things go wrong soon.

72 posted on 06/03/2010 2:56:46 PM PDT by Theophilus (Not merely prolife, but prolific!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: wildbill

For the past 60 years, everyone has said “Social Security is an inviolable compact between the generations.”

***********

Actually, no, EVERYONE did not say that.

The Supreme Court of the United States said, in 1960, that no one has any right to receive Social Security benefits, regardless of how much they have paid in Social Security tax or for how long they paid them. Also, even if you’ve already been getting SS checks, you can be cut of at any time for any reason or no reason.

See Flemming v. Nestor.

See Flemming v. Nestor.


73 posted on 06/03/2010 3:04:14 PM PDT by Hepsabeth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

“Damn! I never get credit for anything. I was born June 29, 1945, a little too old to be a boomer.”

Want to be an “Honorary Boomer” so you can get blamed for everything?


74 posted on 06/03/2010 3:09:08 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Who else but the greatest generation built he edifice and their younger siblings, the father and uncles of the Baby boomers, who are now doing their duty and dying off.


75 posted on 06/03/2010 3:39:04 PM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Excellent post.


76 posted on 06/03/2010 3:42:15 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
What's bankrupting us is Social Security Disability. And NOT for the truly disabled - those people we want to help - but for too many it's the new welfare... People getting social security for 40 to 60 years will destroy any system.
77 posted on 06/03/2010 3:42:55 PM PDT by GOPJ (http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php?area=dam&lang=eng)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Social security was supposed to take care of widows, orphans, the weak and disabled, and to provide a pension for worn-out workers who were supposed to survive “retirement” by five But modern medicine has added fifty years onto the life span, often in the process keeping alive many of us who ought to have died.


78 posted on 06/03/2010 4:06:55 PM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Thank you for an excellent article that is as pertinent to America as to Great Britain. What he outlines herein is why I continue to state that I will not see a penny of Social Security, after putting into it for over 30 years.

At 51 years of age, I will work another 10-15 years before retiring and asking for Social Security. The next 10-15 years worth of Social Security/SSI outlay will see the program thoroughly bankrupted with extreme pressure on the people contributing to it.

Social Security will become a welfare program for those senior citizens who were smart enough to waste all of their money partying and living lavish over a lifetime, while the idiot seniors who scimped and saved and built up a nest egg, are punished for doing so.

Great article until the author goes brain dead at the end with this idea:

“An equally effective alternative would be to give mothers an extra vote for every child under voting age”

Right, lets give all of the welfare queens like Octomom, and all the illegal aliens with 8 anchor babies a huge amount of disproportionate political power so they can vote even more largesse from the public treasure.

Brilliant facking idea. Bloody brilliant.


79 posted on 06/03/2010 4:11:47 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Liberal are like termites eating away our cultural foundations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
What's bankrupting us is Social Security Disability. And NOT for the truly disabled - those people we want to help - but for too many it's the new welfare... People getting social security for 40 to 60 years will destroy any system

"Ending Welfare As We Know It Since 1994."

80 posted on 06/03/2010 4:48:22 PM PDT by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson