Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/06/2010 10:14:19 AM PDT by jern
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jern

and the irony is that a lot of them white women voted for Obama. Welcome to hope and change...dingbats


2 posted on 06/06/2010 10:17:27 AM PDT by Yorlik803 (better to die on your feet than live on your knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern

No it discriminates against caucasian women with leathery, wrinkled, pockmarked skin.


3 posted on 06/06/2010 10:18:51 AM PDT by dr_who
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern

.........Divide & Conquer.........


4 posted on 06/06/2010 10:19:33 AM PDT by GitmoSailor (AZ Cold War Veteran)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern

Cash only purchases (discounted, natch)........If I could buy stock in the black market, I would go all in.

Crazy tax burdens drive the underground economy - the real reason for all the new IRS agents.

Then some smarta$$ will just start levying power usage against the tanning salons.....


5 posted on 06/06/2010 10:19:40 AM PDT by onona (dbada)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern

Plenty of sun here in the Norfolk area. No need for a tanning booth.


6 posted on 06/06/2010 10:21:09 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern

But, but, Obama PROMISED that there would be no new taxes on families making less than 250,000....


7 posted on 06/06/2010 10:23:17 AM PDT by kingu (Favorite Sticker: Lost hope, and Obama took my change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern

Lol....


8 posted on 06/06/2010 10:23:33 AM PDT by Dallas59 (President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern

How is this even Constitutional?

Seems like a precursor to a VAT - if they can tax something that clearly lies outside Federal jurisdiction, they can tax anything.


9 posted on 06/06/2010 10:23:36 AM PDT by bornred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern

It’s a tax on whitey. Purely racist.


14 posted on 06/06/2010 10:35:16 AM PDT by zeebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern

"Discriminates against white women."

Yes, yes it does.

15 posted on 06/06/2010 10:39:28 AM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
Since UV tanning is one of the single unhealthiest activities a human being can engage in, this piece of the health care legislation actually makes a certain kind of sense.

Not that it's the government's place to use the tax code to micromanage behavior, of course. :)

16 posted on 06/06/2010 10:43:34 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ( "The right to offend is far more important than any right not to be offended." - Rowan Atkinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern

It’s a tax on white women who want to look brown. There was a time when white women dressed in long sleeves, wore gloves, large hats, and umbrellas to avoid being blemished by the sun.


17 posted on 06/06/2010 10:45:35 AM PDT by douginthearmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern
File suit. It is the American way. We will not be disrespected by this clearly racist policy. The tan-disadvantaged will not be discriminated against. Racist government policy that denies citizens their rights based only on their color of their skin will not be tolerated.

Down with tan lines!

This picture provides some insteresting photoshop possibilities and caption possibilities related to the tan-line-tax that Obama wanted to see.

19 posted on 06/06/2010 11:20:59 AM PDT by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern

Solution: Charge $29.95 for each bottle of [insert favorite brand here] Drinking Water. With the purchase of each bottle, 1 hour of tanning is awarded free. Price of Tanning? $0.00. 10% of this cost goes happily to the government... I LOVE MATHEMATICS! If its based on company earnings, find a cooperative water dealer!


20 posted on 06/06/2010 11:42:07 AM PDT by cqnc (Don't Blame ME, I voted for the American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern

This is just another Nanny State tax. New, there will be taxes on anything and everything the nanny state deems unhealthy; TV sets (promotes sedentary lifestyle), computers (ditto), candy (rots teeth), soft drinks (too caloric), movie theaters (sedentary, again). The possible list is endless. In fact, about the only thing that won’t be taxed might be broccoli and cauliflower; and maybe parsnips get a pass.


22 posted on 06/06/2010 11:56:20 AM PDT by 6SJ7 (atlasShruggedInd = TRUE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern

23 posted on 06/06/2010 11:59:39 AM PDT by TightyRighty (I enjoy well-mannered frivolity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern

It’s the Cracker Tax.


25 posted on 06/06/2010 12:26:53 PM PDT by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jern

she has a point, if congress passed a tax on dreadlocks the NAACP would be up in arms about discrimination.


27 posted on 06/06/2010 1:27:46 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson