Posted on 06/07/2010 6:51:41 AM PDT by Jim W N
This is how approached the book. It is a good story. For me it posed, everybody does have their own idea of what God looks like etc..
Just take it for what it is a good Novel.
The adversary isn't stupid. He's more brilliant than a thousand stars.
He appears as the angel of light, Lucifer.
I read "The Shack", and was dumbfounded.
How people who believe they are Christians, could not see the evil deception
in that piece of trash, is beyond me.
That absolute lack of discernment explains ALL of the corruption in the "church" today.
The root of the word church, eklesia, means "called out, or "seperate".
The "church" in America today is nothing of the kind.
Many of us who have a great sadness very much need to go to our “shack” where God is waiting to heal us.
Circuit City did that too. I just always gave them 867-5309
I am a devout and long time Christian.....I read The Shack and took it for just another story on the way some people believe.....it was fiction and I took it as that.
'The adversary' is a creature of pride. He LOVES to hear how great he is. He declared he wanted to be like the 'Most High'. Too many times, he gets 'worship' from those within the camp of the Most High. Sad...
Lack of discernment is ENCOURAGED by the political left, who are either actively working for the enemy or they are just useful idiots.
And to those who think you’re Christians and yet assert there are “many ways to God”, you’re not Christians. Being a Christian inherently assumes that Christ is the only way to salvation (unless you’re perfect, eh).
Professional jealousy is a terrible thing, don’t you think?
Jim - I think your comments are great. So here’s another “long post”.
Wayne Jacobsen ( www.lifestream.org ), author of “He Loves Me” (a solid theological book and a “must read” after The Shack) and other works was the editor/publisher of The Shack and the one who encouraged Paul to publish The Shack. Wayne is a good friend of mine, and with Wayne and others I had the joy of spending a day with Paul Young, Wayne, and Brad Cummings who also helped edit The Shack.
I saw an interview of Paul where he clearly disavowed believing in universal salvation/no hell. Wayne has stayed in our home several times, the last one when we had literally hundreds gathering to discuss the “issues” that critics had with the book. Wayne is solid theologically and quite well answered every issue. The questions were quite pointed, especially as one time we were using the facilities of an SBC church near us and the pastor was firing questions at Wayne in every area. Wayne so well explained things that this pastor asked him to come back and speak in the future.
The Shack does have “issues”, but people miss the point. The point is the incredible depth, width, height and breadth of God’s love and His redemptive sovereignty over all that happens to us in our damaged lives. Having served in ministry for over 40 years, I know of no other book that has drawn damaged, hurting people back into the grace of God, loving and walking with Him than The Shack.
I brought the main message at the memorial service for Rachael Hill ( www.rachaelhill.org ) - one of the kids killed at the Virginia Tech shootings, as I have been close with her family all of her life. She has played my wife’s Yamaha grand piano many times.
After reading The Shack, I strongly felt led to give a copy to Rachael’s father. I wrestled with this for about a month. “How can I give a man whose daughter has just been murdered a book about a man whose daughter is murdered?!?!” Eventually, I did it.
Rachael’s father - a man of God who knows scripture well - called me every day to say only one word: “Wow!” until he finished the book, when he said, “This is the best book I’ve ever read other than the Bible.” He has since given away hundreds of copies, and led many to Christ - many who otherwise would have no contact with any church. He has seen many deeply-hurting people come into rest and comfort and trust in God.
So have I. It’s the only book I know in my life where most readers don’t recommend it to their friends. They go buy copies and give them away.
No, we cannot get theology from the book, and should not. I have been one to strongly oppose all “Christian” novels. But this one changed my mind. I have seen too many brought to Christ, and too many who totally rejected the “Christian religion” come back to a walk and trust in God - and who continue in it today.
Thanks for your post.
arlis
It’s at the . . . sugar shack! Yeah baby at the, sugar shack.
didn’t you try to read this and find yourself unable to finish it?
I'm sure that's in there too.
I hope you're right about Young and "universal salvation." I saw some taped interviews with Young that left me wondering, but I don't see this as "dispositive" to the book itself.
Yes. I could not stand it.
“Having served in ministry for over 40 years, I know of no other book that has drawn damaged, hurting people back into the grace of God, loving and walking with Him than The Shack.”
The Word of God will always out-perform any pulp-fiction “best seller”.
It really wasn't good entertainment.
My understanding is that the author wrote it as a novel, so I don't see the issue.
Are you now in favor of pro-Muslim novels?
I wouldn't read one, and I might criticize it's content. I'm not in favor of book banning as a whole. I do have issues about some books put into public school libraries using my tax dollars. But I wouldn't say that the book couldn't be sold in bookstores.
Of course. Forgive me for not re-stating what Rachael’s father said, “other than the Bible.” I should have clarified “book published in the last 40 years.”
I promised myself I would never write a book because the great need of 99.9% of all Christians is to be in the scripture and know it intimately - and that the sad state of Christendom is so few Christians - so few PASTORS - really know the Word of God. And believers so quickly run to books - and 99.9% of their beliefs come not from knowing scripture - but what some man (or woman) said. Their knowledge is mostly “2nd hand”, sadly.
I’m not a book pusher.
arlis
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.