Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Admin to Spend $125M to Defend Pro-Abortion Health Care Law
LifeNews.com ^ | June 7, 2010 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 06/07/2010 8:34:44 AM PDT by julieee

Obama Admin to Spend $125M to Defend Pro-Abortion Health Care Law Washington, DC -- The Obama administration is unveiling a new $125 million publicity campaign over the next five years to promote the pro-abortion health care law. Obama officials are replying on a pro-abortion former senator and a former official of a top pro-abortion group to make the case for the law.

http://LifeNews.com/nat6398.html

(Excerpt) Read more at LifeNews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abortion; cultureofcorruption; deathcult; democratscandals; dnctalkingpoints; healthcarelaw; howtostealanelection; obama; obamascandals; prodeath; taxdollarsatwork

1 posted on 06/07/2010 8:34:44 AM PDT by julieee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: julieee

Obortion will have us broke within 5 years so it won’t matter.


2 posted on 06/07/2010 8:40:12 AM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Im Laura Bush and I approve of this message.


3 posted on 06/07/2010 8:41:10 AM PDT by Gasshog (going to get what all those libs asked for, but its not what they expected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

How can they spend federal money collected through taxes (or worse, borrowed) this way?


4 posted on 06/07/2010 8:43:56 AM PDT by Rapscallion (Obama - The anti-American dictator disguised as a President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Spend, spend, spend. It’s only your money, don’t worry about it. Let’s see what happens when the American people stop sending their tax money to Washington.


5 posted on 06/07/2010 8:46:53 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

That is OUR money he’s spending. For those of us who truly have a problem with tearing a baby apart in it’s mother’s womb, this is a rather nasty rub.

We have murdered 40 million members of the next generational tax base- doesn’t make a whole lot’a sense, does it?


6 posted on 06/07/2010 8:53:45 AM PDT by 13Sisters76 ("It is amazing how many people mistake a certain hip snideness for sophistication. " Thos. Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

If people wanted RATcare, it would not be necessary to spend a dime, let alone 125 million, on a cheerleading program telling people how wonderful it is.

The problem for Obamalini is not that people don’t understand the law, but rather that they do.


7 posted on 06/07/2010 8:55:39 AM PDT by freespirited (There are a lot of bad Republicans but there are no good Democrats.--Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

How can tax money be used to campaign on?

The FEC is asleep again.


8 posted on 06/07/2010 8:56:28 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Throw the bums out in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rapscallion
How can they spend federal money collected through taxes (or worse, borrowed) this way?

Easy! Simply ignore the law! If someone complains or files suit to stop it, the process will take so long the issue will be moot. Even if the plaintiff wins what does he win? Will the court make the Government give the money back to the taxpayer? How? With taxpayer money like Chrysler paid off their "loan"?

9 posted on 06/07/2010 8:58:59 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

You are looking at this wrong. It isn’t just to “get the word out”.

By giving $125,000,000 to pro-abortion forces, they can in turn, give BACK these dollars to pro-abortion candidates and the DNC.

This is the entire fraud behind the “stimulus” that gave millions to ACORN, et al.

The Democrats are funding the next several election cycles off of our looted economy.


10 posted on 06/07/2010 8:59:01 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Throw the bums out in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot

How can Obama spend money on this by decree? Congress spends the money, the president gives his approval or rejection on the bills.


11 posted on 06/07/2010 9:00:13 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Throw the bums out in 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
How can Obama spend money on this by decree? Congress spends the money, the president gives his approval or rejection on the bills.

Just as I said above - ignore the Constitution and do it anyway. Do you think the Democrat controlled Congress will complain? Besides, last I heard the Congress itself has ignored its Constitutional duty to pass a budget for next year. They could do it retroactively if the cared to.

Slick Willie and the Democrats passed an unconstitutional retroactive tax increase early in his administration and nothing was done. Slick and Algore each solicited and accepted foreign campaign funds in 1996 and that was illegal. In fact, it was the real reason Slick should have been impeached but they got side tracked, happily for the Democrats, on the Lewinsky deal because that was the first thing Starr found that was impeachable and the law said he had to file the first thing found. The Democrats steadfastly refused to even look at the evidence of campaign finance abuse, which was voluminous, and they kept the attention focused on Lewinsky instead.

When Democrats have power they aggressively abuse it while at the same time accusing the Republicans of abuse. Remember the Culture of Corruption charge. That is a typical Leftist ploy to divert attention away from themselves.!

12 posted on 06/07/2010 9:19:01 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Isn’t this officially propoganda?


13 posted on 06/07/2010 9:26:28 AM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf aInd dumb to the chariot wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ..

The list, ping


14 posted on 06/07/2010 9:51:34 AM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rapscallion

What really ticks me off is that MY tax dollard are going to defend something I am against in the first place. It makes me sick to think of how many things I detest are getting my tax dollars. I am fed up with federal government!


15 posted on 06/07/2010 10:52:50 AM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

To vote for a leftist is to vote for the murderous torture of 90% born infants.


16 posted on 06/08/2010 2:03:30 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Kagan ENDED Constitutional Law in Harvard: freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2523089/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson