Posted on 06/07/2010 1:44:46 PM PDT by blam
Gold $7,000!
By Chris Mayer
06/07/10 Gaithersburg, Maryland – During a week when almost everything went wrong, the gold market went very right. In fact, gold has been going very right for more than a decade. The gold price has more than quadrupled during the last 10 years. So is it too late to buy the stuff?
My short answer is, “No.”
Admittedly, gold is not like any other investment. It is not merely a financial asset; it is the ultimate form of money. But that doesn’t mean it is always a good investment. Many investors make a case for gold laden with ideological fury over the government’s printing press. These investors are always saying buy gold. Their arguments are timeless, but not always timely.
If you bought gold in the 1980s and 1990s, your return was abysmal. So, as with all assets, there are times when gold is a really good buy and there are times when it is not. Sounds obvious, but many people seem to want to think that gold is an exception to the order of things. It isn’t.
But how do you know if gold is cheap? Well, intelligent people usually advance a couple of arguments:
1) On an inflation-adjusted basis, gold is 30% less than its all-time high in 1980. Okay, that’s true, but it’s not particularly timely because by that measure gold has been cheap for three decades. And who’s to say that the 1980 gold price is a benchmark we should pay attention to anyway? By that way of thinking, the NASDAQ is a bargain, too, because it trades at a big gap from its 2000 high. But is it? I think not.
2) The other point often advanced by the “gold is cheap” crowd is the old monetary base argument – that gold’s price tends to track the monetary base over long periods. The monetary base is essentially bank deposits and currency. It’s like the seedlings of inflation.
This second argument is a little more interesting. Yet, as the government has added huge piles to the monetary base in the last year or so, the gold price has responded in a muted way.
The hedge fund QB Partners really likes this argument. QB writes:
“True capital has already begun to flow where it is being treated best – to capital-producing economies and to global stores of wealth, from paper money and financial assets to hard money and hard assets…We think gold is cheap by a factor of almost 7 times.”
If a gold price of $7,000 an ounce doesn’t strike you as implausible or absurd, QB’s next comment might. QB says, “The gold price could move higher than [$7,000 an ounce] if it experiences a blow off top, like all other bull markets tend to do before exhausting themselves.” So, $7,000 an ounce, you see, is just some kind of base case.
Maybe it’s not so implausible. Strange stuff happens all the time in markets. If I had told you on May 6 that Accenture – a $40 stock with a $29 billion market cap – would trade for a penny a share the next day, you would have thought I was nuts. Yet, on May 7 it did just that, if only for a second.
As investors, we tend to think too narrowly within the confines of what seems probable. Yet, the really big money lies in the outlying events. As QB puts it:
Most investors allocate to the markets by playing the odds, which by definition gravitates capital to the middle of a bell curve of possible outcomes. This fools the investor into thinking that the probability of future events is somewhat predictable. Of course, history is rife with startling social, economic and political “tail” events. Stuff happens – things like earthquakes, the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the 1980 US Olympic hockey team, the demotion of Pluto, dotcom bubbles, liar loans and even periodic global economic failures and the re-assertion of gold as money.
This is essentially the familiar “black swan” argument made popular by Nassim Taleb. This is really the best argument for gold in my view. It is a hedge against really bad stuff happening. And when really bad stuff happens, gold holds up.
Of course, over the last decade, it has more than held up. Gold has been the best-performing asset class from December 1999 to December 2010.
People often invest by looking in the rearview mirror. They feel better investing in stuff that has done well. Even professionals feel this way. Money follows performance, which is why so many investors get mediocre results. They hop into the hot fund or sign up for the hot newsletter just as it is about to go cold. They abandon apparent losing strategies and sell poor-performing stocks just as they are about to turn up.
But the gold market is different because it’s so small. Even a small amount of interest in gold will send it up a lot. Just imagine if people decide a small sliver of that tall bar of financial assets should be in gold. We’re talking about some serious pressure on the gold price.
Frankly, the gold market is set up perfectly these days. You couldn’t design it better. Bad stuff is happening – see the crisis in Europe. And you can surely bet more bad stuff will happen, given all the debt and leverage that still remains in the system. Even if you don’t know exactly what will happen or when it will happen, you know a monetary crisis is good for gold.
As an added bonus, gold has a track record, which will attract fans soon enough. And when it does, it can’t really accommodate many buyers because the market is small. This means the chance of the gold price spiking upwards are pretty good. It’s like being in the lifeboat business on the Titanic. No price will seem too high!
I just buy ammo.
It's as much an investment as oil, gas, land, or any other commodity. It can be bought and sold freely, sometimes for profit. Sometimes not.
While its industrial use is more limited, it has two redeeming qualities - scarcity and durability.
Right. But it is a great hedge during periods of investment insecurity.
|
Lotsa little BAHOGs.
Hopefully they get the gold only after the lead is depleted.
/johnny
Hell, peanut butter would be more valuable.
No one is saying buy gold INSTEAD of ammo.
Buy gold AFTER you’ve bought ammo.
_____________________________________
Please explain, in detail, why you say this.
What if you purchased it ten years ago?
If they come to "confiscate" gold, feed them lead instead, 168 grains at a time.
Frankly, I think that they'll go after 401K's and IRAs long before they'll consider stealing gold. Retirement funds can be stolen with a few clicks of the mouse from outside of the range of most personal weapons, whereas confiscating personal property (like gold) would require a physical presence.
When the SHTF and you have to possibly leave your domicile, which will you take with you.
1. food, water, weapons and all other necessary provisions?
2. or your pile of gold?
3. or your stinking piece of paper that says you own some gold?
$1239 today, not $7000. The headline/first lines are misleading.
You're on the right track, FOOD. But, peanut butter goes bad too fast.
1. food, water, weapons and all other necessary provisions?
2. or your pile of gold?
3. or your stinking piece of paper that says you own some gold?
My pile of gold is extremely small. I'll take it AND my food, water, weapons, and ammunition. Along with my slightly larger small pile of silver. A means of trade will be necessary for the re-establishment of an orderly society.
A nice advantage of precious metals is that you can use them to transfer wealth to your heirs as you age without a tax penalty. I suppose that cash can do the same, but consider where cash is going soon, I'd rather give something with more permanent value.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
If it ever comes to the point that you really need to have gold, lead and brass will be needed even more.