Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impy

Slow growth accounted for the dramatic loss of seats starting in the 1820s (it was pretty strong growth from 1790-1810, going from 2 to 6 House seats, but it only had 6 from 1813-1823). It lost its 2nd seat back in 1932. We probably should be grateful that it doesn’t have 6 seats today, since 3 or 4 would probably be Leahy Democrats and 1 or 2 would be a liberal RINO and 1 would be a far-left Burlington Progressive.


20 posted on 06/16/2010 9:33:51 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj; Impy

One also has to take into account how the size of Congress grew through the years, and then stayed stagnant at 435 starting in 1913 IIRC.

If VT had 6 seats today, then it would likely be a Republican state, since only if the state were pro-business and pro-family could it increase its population from its 1830-1930 levels to 4 million.


21 posted on 06/16/2010 10:54:36 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson