Posted on 06/21/2010 6:53:53 AM PDT by highlander_UW
He is right. We all should be angry that this culture and its politics is increasingly oriented towards those who produce and contribute nothing of value to society. So much money is wasted on pleasing fringe activists on the left while the interests of the most responsible and the most productive are ignored.
It looks like the parasites are answering his question in their own inarticulate way. Unfortunately, Dems are too stupid to recognize when a question is being posed rhetorically.
Hint to Democrats: you aren’t supposed to “answer” a rhetorical question.
2. Stake the trailor out with a shotgun. Arson is a deadly weapon, and intent to burn a cross on another person's property for the purpose of intimidation is inherently threatening as well as illegal.
3. I have no problem with self-defense against one or more serial arsonists, if this homeowner has to "shoot to stop an immediate threat to his own safety" after encountering these violent parasites.
HAHAHAHAHAA Great Sign!!!
The perps that did this will never be caught or if the are, nothing will be done to them, because they are Liberals and Liberals always get away with things by saying they "made a mistake."
cool, thanks for the info
If one reads the article, one reads that the COPS STOLE HIS ROLEX WATCH! !
H e sued, and the jury gave him an award. THE JUDGE OVERTURNED THE JURY AWARD ! ! !
JUDGEIE POO IS A BADGE LAPPER ! ! !
This means this citizen is living hostile country, where the cops and judge have demonstrated malignant animosity towards him.
Pray he survives. This publicity is his best protection, as the system will not protect him.
I read that disgusting part of the article. That's why I like a shotgun. A good 12 gauge can solve the problem, and it's hard even for a corrupt judge to argue with self-defense when a poor old man is menaced by potentially violent serial arsonists and the only survivor left to tell the tale.
Notice how they give his business name and address near the end of the article? Just in case the perps might want to torch that as well.
Last week, I was so delighted to find ‘Atlas Shrugged’ at the thrift store. (I heard that it is hard to get right now because of demand.) I’m about half-way through it and occasionally I have to pause reading and shake my head in disbelief that it seems so current.
Here's a clue, you Democrat. You cross the line at the first match. Arson is a felony, in case you don't know.
What a jerk.
They believe in every entitlement except the right to express one’s opinion that disagrees with theirs.
Scary, scary stuff, although not at all surprising coming from a Dem.
I think that the person in this article is very likely a bomb-thrower, but he's got every right to speak his mind. Surprised that Rush, FOX, etc haven't picked this one up yet.
No, it does seem to indicate that, although the arson was maybe a little more than she would have personally done, had a level of justification in her mind. Liberals are not liberal, they are fascists in disguise.
I understand what you are saying, my wife tells me that it’s a sign of getting old.
There are too many “celebrities” nowadays. Back in the day, Hollywood studios kept a “stable of stars” under contract., thus limiting the crowd. Now, any dufus with a computer, like Perez Hilton, or a camera on Youtube is trying to get their 15 minutes of fame. Sports of all kinds, Music of all genres, Movies, Television and Radio all contribute their celebrity crowds to the mix. It seems Andy Warhol was right......................................
They get upset if they are called parasites, predators and illegals.
They really get upset if they qualify for all 3 of the above!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.