Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: Libs Hate Her Because She's Beautiful, Not Like That Michelle Obama
The Houston Press ^ | 6/23/10

Posted on 06/23/2010 8:50:59 AM PDT by llevrok

Texas Tech, that bastion of Americanism way out there in Lubbock, has done it again.

This time they're not protesting a statue that allegedly features Commies and lesbians, nor are they linking tattoos to social deviance.

This time, they're saying liberals hate Sarah Palin because she's beautiful, and libs prefer dogs like Eleanor Roosevelt, Hillary Clinton and Elena Kagan. Well, at least one Red Raider is.

A.W.R. Hawkins writes an online column for the conservative Human Events and proudly lists in his bio that he has a Ph.D. in military history from Tech. Which makes him an expert on dames, apparently.

Libs and Dems hate Sarah Palin because she's for smaller government, he writes in his latest column; they hate her because she didn't go to an Ivy League school and they hate her because "she chose to carry her Down Syndrome baby to term instead of aborting it. (That last one really drives them crazy.)"

But what really sets these abortion-loving atheists off? "[A]ll these reasons are trumped by the fact that they despise her beauty," he writes.

As a member of the media, we supposedly knew this already:

The double standard resides here: When Palin dresses in nice clothes reporters act like she's being ostentatious, but when Mrs. Obama does it reporters are taken aback by her glamour. Yet the dirty little secret is that Palin could don a $90.00 dress from Wal-Mart and steal the show from a diamond covered Mrs. Obama any day, and the media knows it. Got it. The analysis goes even deeper, hard as it may be to believe:

[T]he left criticizes that which they fear. We also have to keep in mind the fact that all the names they throw at Palin are really code words for "Dang, that woman looks good."

And who can blame them for noticing? After all, since the 1930s they've spent their time supporting women who looked like Eleanor Roosevelt, Hillary Clinton, Janet Reno, Tipper Gore, and Elena Kagan.

Suffice it to say there isn't a lot of pinup potential in that list. Texas Tech represent!!! No fatties allowed!


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2010electionbias; catfight; dnctalkingpoints; downisup; getpalin; houston; houstonpress; lyingliar; plainbashing; pravdamedia; stalinisttactics; villagevoicemedia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: Jedidah
She could be “dryin’ out” too.
61 posted on 06/23/2010 9:35:50 AM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

I don’t get why Sarah would be compared with Michelle. Michelle is a nice looking lady. Sarah is a beautiful lady made more so by her inspiring and energizing countenance.

Neither lady needs to worry about their looks or feel competitive toward the other.


62 posted on 06/23/2010 9:36:14 AM PDT by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimbell

According to the Time Magazine caption, she was “sliding into position” on the stage.

Time Magazine:
“The First Lady slides into her spot alongside other G-20 spouses before a group photo at the Royal Opera House.”
http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1889051_1865162,00.html


63 posted on 06/23/2010 9:37:00 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: cvq3842
But I think somehow a sizable portion of the public hears that voice and decides she is “stupid,” which she most certainly is not.

She wouldn't disclose her reading list to Katie Colonic and the leftist meme is that she's illiterate.

Who wants to give the NYTimes website et al a bump/plug?

Meanwhile our quota president has NOT read the Arizona bill he so strongly opposes yet he managed to get around to reading an interview with a General in Rolling Stoned Magazine.

President GW Bush was a voracious reader yet the media never much commented on it.

64 posted on 06/23/2010 9:39:18 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
"Could it be what Sarah says and stands for, and the lefts knee-jerk reaction to anyone and anything decent, rather than her looks? Michele and what she looks like is a non-issue in my opinion."

I believe it's a combo of both. Sarah IS a beautiful woman....inside and out. She has a large family, including a down syndrome baby, which the left DESPISES she didn't abort, as most of them have done.

We talk about michelle my belle's looks because the lame stream media talks about how beautiful she is and how well she dresses.

We MUST ALWAYS combat lies!

65 posted on 06/23/2010 9:39:40 AM PDT by NoGrayZone (Palin/West for 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ETL

She slides into every appearance?

That is like when the media claiming that Jackie Kennedy was “going for help” when she got the hell out of the moving limo because shots were being fired.


66 posted on 06/23/2010 9:40:34 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

67 posted on 06/23/2010 9:47:18 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

68 posted on 06/23/2010 9:49:12 AM PDT by texas_mrs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise
She slides into every appearance?

Whatever she was doing, it obviously wasn't very lady-like.

69 posted on 06/23/2010 9:50:49 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: llevrok
IMHO what inflames liberals about Sarah Palin is that she is not only attractive but does not come across as the blithering bumpkin they expect in their stereotypical view of conservative women. Liberal women, including my wife and her sister, ridicule everything Palin says as being stupid, idiotic and uneducated. Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton do not come across as being that smart and have made some terrible gaffs in public statements. The Obama's in particular have made some terrible faux pas overseas and in the foreign press are ridiculed as clods.
70 posted on 06/23/2010 9:52:38 AM PDT by The Great RJ (The Bill of Rights: Another bill members of Congress haven't read.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Dear God. I always thought that was Photoshopped.


71 posted on 06/23/2010 9:53:54 AM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: texas_mrs

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

72 posted on 06/23/2010 9:54:35 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ETL
Whatever she was doing, it obviously wasn't very lady-like.

Depends on the lady:


73 posted on 06/23/2010 9:55:07 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC
I always thought that was Photoshopped.

You're not alone. Took me a while to track down the source (Time Magazine).

74 posted on 06/23/2010 9:58:46 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway

Chewbaca in drag.


75 posted on 06/23/2010 10:05:35 AM PDT by JaguarXKE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

MO takes tons of makeup, wigs, straps, belts and numerous artists to make her look good.

She can’t don a simple outfit and a small amount of makeup to look good like a Sarah Palin. It probably takes hours to fix up MO before an event.

I guess it is a testament that talent can make a sows ear appear as a silk purse for major events.


76 posted on 06/23/2010 10:06:36 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Sarah is not only good looking, she is tougher than Barry or Michelle.


77 posted on 06/23/2010 10:15:39 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

It’s true. Just look at any liberal woman over 35 and you will clearly see that few are attractive. It’s as if the ugly inside makes it’s way out? I truely think it is the happiness factor. Liberals are never happy even when they get what they want.


78 posted on 06/23/2010 10:30:36 AM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

The left doesn’t like Sarah because she can beat Obama at basketball.

She actually played.


79 posted on 06/23/2010 10:31:47 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Palin is hot. She also loves America. Michelle is not. And she hates America. Predictable that liberals would prefer Michelle. Normal that real Americans would LOVE Palin.
80 posted on 06/23/2010 10:32:20 AM PDT by Godwin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson