Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steinem criticizes Palin for using feminist brand
LA TImes ^ | 6/23/10 | Michael Muskal

Posted on 06/24/2010 4:32:06 AM PDT by reaganrevolutionin2010

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: reaganrevolutionin2010
Gloria made her fortune the old fashioned way:

She married it.

61 posted on 06/24/2010 7:32:17 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganrevolutionin2010

This is one of the things that always angers me about “feminists” who hate Palin. The essence of feminism is that women should have the power to make the choices that direct their lives.

Palin has made the choices that work for her— and no feminist should criticize her for it.

I was a stay at home mom when my children were young and that was important to me. We worked hard to ensure I could stay home and we did without. All the “enlightened” people we knew treated me like I had no brain.

Sarah Palin is a working mom who found a supportive husband who actively parents the children. She continues to work, raise her children, make choices according to her conscience, contribute to her country as a productive citizen, and fearlessly speaks her mind whenever she feels like it.

That’s my idea of a feminist. And that’s what we need to throw back in their faces when feminists complain about her. She’s living out her own personal choices in her own unique way. She’s a truly “empowered” woman.


62 posted on 06/24/2010 8:11:52 AM PDT by Melian ( God is even kinder than you think. ~St. Teresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganrevolutionin2010
In an interview with @katiecouric, Steinem argued that a woman who chooses not to have an abortion can call herself a feminist, but “you can't be a feminist who says other women can't have an abortion."

I guess at the root it really is about the right to kill babies.

63 posted on 06/24/2010 8:34:34 AM PDT by gogeo ("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

adjure = abjure

What was I thinking!


64 posted on 06/24/2010 9:51:19 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MrB

stupid is as stupid does... go for it...


65 posted on 06/24/2010 12:46:59 PM PDT by dps.inspect (uttox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: reaganrevolutionin2010

Yikes! She looks like a shrunken apple head.


66 posted on 06/24/2010 12:49:04 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: reaganrevolutionin2010
Gloria Steinem is YESTERYEAR.

She's a day late and a dollar short.

67 posted on 06/24/2010 12:55:16 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
Think it began with a bunch of ugly leftists, who, over the years. . .

Well, would change that a bit:

. . .it began with Betty Friedan - the real (and really ugly) Mother of modern Feminism (who, if alive, might look today, like Helen Thomas' twin.)

Betty's call to Feminism began with her communist roots; and she was an active and influential participant of American Communist movement. The 'Feminine Mystique' was cleverly enriched by Betty's world view and it created the 'tidal wave' of mainstream Leftism/Socialism in America. Interesting that her Communist commitments were never seriously made note of, until after her death.

All to say; Feminism began with an ugly side; both by it's author; and it's 'communist' influences, cleverly embedded.

(Betty was questioned by McCarthy in House Hearings per Un-American Activities as well - but this not ever mentioned on her FM book jacket or book reviews or her early bio info, for that matter.)

68 posted on 06/24/2010 1:46:29 PM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: cricket
I was taking things back a bit further to the womens suffrage movement, which had MANY conservative women in it.
69 posted on 06/24/2010 3:46:47 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
I was taking things back a bit further to the womens suffrage movement, which had MANY conservative women in it.

Oh, OK and yes; and in which case, a movement we can all appreciate as a moral move forward - in consciousness; at least per 'women's Right-to-Vote'. Here, we had a step forward per 'civilizing' a society and body politic.

OTHO; along with the good that Betty's thesis rode on; there was embedded in her 'ideals' and intentions; the 'communist ideal'. Her voice carried it; the Feminist disciples immersed themselves in it; and 'change' happened; good; bad - and ugly.

The bad was America' firmament changed - for the worse. It was the misunderstanding and fraudulent labeling of 'power' that sent Thelma and Louise off the cliff - and by which, eventually, a more authentic Feminism replaced it.

Glora it seems; never got the phone call or the 'knock on the door'. . .

70 posted on 06/24/2010 5:49:15 PM PDT by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson