Skip to comments.
Hatch Opposes Kagan’s Nomination
The Wall Street Journal ^
| 07-02-10
| Mary Lu Carnevale
Posted on 07/02/2010 1:23:50 PM PDT by GOP_Lady
Edited on 07/02/2010 1:57:20 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
Sen. Orrin Hatch (R., Utah) announced this morning that he
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: hatch; kagan; kagantruthfile; scotus; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
1
posted on
07/02/2010 1:23:51 PM PDT
by
GOP_Lady
To: 506Lake; AdvisorB; afraidfortherepublic; antivenom; angry elephant; Bernard; Blonde; ...
|
To be added or removed from the
"The Wall Street Journal" Ping List,
FReepmail GOP_Lady. |
2
posted on
07/02/2010 1:24:40 PM PDT
by
GOP_Lady
To: GOP_Lady
Thanks Orin. Now, convince the rest of your side of the aisle.
3
posted on
07/02/2010 1:27:26 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Sarah/Michele 2012)
To: GOP_Lady
Is he up for re election or something?
4
posted on
07/02/2010 1:27:48 PM PDT
by
kempster
To: onyx
He fooled me, I thought sure he would sell us out-—and it isnt over yet.
5
posted on
07/02/2010 1:28:44 PM PDT
by
Venturer
To: onyx
FOX just said Mitch McConnell will Not vote for Kagan
6
posted on
07/02/2010 1:30:22 PM PDT
by
SoCalPol
(Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
To: GOP_Lady
"The law must control the judge; the judge must not control the law. I have concluded that...General Kagan regrettably does not meet this standard." Perfect. Orrin finally connects.
7
posted on
07/02/2010 1:31:34 PM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(0bama calls us "Tea Baggers", so we can call Kagan a "Carpet Muncher," right?)
To: Venturer
Guessing Orrin got scared by Bennett’s loss.
8
posted on
07/02/2010 1:32:30 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Sarah/Michele 2012)
To: SoCalPol
Mitch too. Good.
Lindsey will vote for her.
9
posted on
07/02/2010 1:33:24 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Sarah/Michele 2012)
To: SoCalPol
The problem is that Neither Hatch nor McConnell will filibuster, and have promised not to, which makes their opposition as effective as mine.
10
posted on
07/02/2010 1:33:36 PM PDT
by
TitansAFC
("At that point in time (2000 race), McCain was as conservative if not more so than GWB." --- pissant)
To: GOP_Lady; potlatch; ntnychik
This thing despises the natural law underlying the Declaration and the Constitution.
Thou shalt have no other god before a despot from Harvard, Barry be his name.
Thank you Orrin, 1-202-224-5251.
11
posted on
07/02/2010 1:36:10 PM PDT
by
PhilDragoo
(Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
To: TitansAFC
It is moot anyways. More Dems in the Senate than Republicans.
Maybe next time the sit at home and third party loons will understand they are enabling the Democrats by keeping them the majority
12
posted on
07/02/2010 1:38:25 PM PDT
by
SoCalPol
(Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
To: SoCalPol
Republicans have the votes to stop her if they have the spine.
We have to target those that support her for defeat in their next election.
13
posted on
07/02/2010 1:44:34 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
To: GOP_Lady
Useless posturing. The broad will be confirmed.
To: All
"In his statement, Hatch said that while other Supreme Court justices had no prior judicial experience, like Kagan, they did have “an average of 21 years in private legal practice. General Kagan has two.”" WHO is General Kagan???
To: fatnotlazy
Yup. Don’t sweat it, Orrin, she’s in anyway. Slam dunk.
16
posted on
07/02/2010 1:52:23 PM PDT
by
Past Your Eyes
(No matter where you go there are always more stupid people.)
To: fatnotlazy
Yup. Don’t sweat it, Orrin, she’s in anyway. Slam dunk.
17
posted on
07/02/2010 1:52:27 PM PDT
by
Past Your Eyes
(No matter where you go there are always more stupid people.)
To: GOP_Lady
He did a great job at the hearing...
To: editor-surveyor
Haven’t heard what Democrat Senators will vote against her
to cut into the Dem majority
19
posted on
07/02/2010 1:55:04 PM PDT
by
SoCalPol
(Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
To: GOP_Lady
” General Kagan “????? WTH??
Are we doing combo confirmations now, 2 for the price of 1?
Ah well, anything to cut costs.
20
posted on
07/02/2010 1:58:23 PM PDT
by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(At the end of the day, with 0bama, we're on a slippery slope sending a message to an underachiever.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson