From the story: “If McCain had a more conservative challenger, National Review wrote, the endorsement might have gone elsewhere. But while Hayworth’s record is conservative, the article read, it isn’t conservative enough to make a compelling case against McCain.”
Yeah, J. D.’s 97.5% lifetime ACU rating was just not sufficient to overtake McShame’s 81% in Never Relevant Opinion’s analysis.
From the story: “He may not be Marco Rubio, but he’s not Arlen Specter either,” the editorial said of McCain.
No, McShame is one of a kind—a backstabbing weasle who will turn on conservatives the day after the election, as he has always done in the past.
The voters get what they deserve. If they want to send a corrupt, creepy, backstabber like McShame back to D.C., so be it. I wouldn’t be as bothered about so idiotic a choice if it didn’t also affect citizens outside of Arizona.
If I was going to bet, I would bet that Mc Cain will be re-elected. In fact, it would not surprise me if the Republican Party re-nominated him in 2012 if he is still alive.
Like you said, the voters get what they deserve.