Replies

with all the ‘papers please’ daily crap from liberals about racial profiling, which is constitutional BTW, no mention of it in lawsuit. I did see this :

“The lawsuit goes on to say that a “state may not establish its own immigration policy or enforce state laws in a manner that interferes with the federal immigration laws. The Constitution and the federal immigration laws do not permit the development of a patchwork of state and local immigration policies throughout the country.”

The problem is the state law looks like the federal law.

The problem is the state law looks like the federal law.

This is interesting. IF a federal judge strikes down the Arizona law which is essentially a reiteration of the federal law as you said, then such a decision would certainly apply against FEDERAL law, and that would literally open the flood gates to as many illegals as want to cross the border at any given time, which might well be what the 0bamunist regime is hoping for.

Whatever decision is made in the federal court system, this case WILL (IMHO) end up before the SCOTUS and the Roberts court is not at all inclined to look very favorably upon the legal shenanigans of Comrade Zero and his crew of Communist agitators.

” The problem is the state law looks like the federal law. “

The new Arizona law MIRRORS the Federal law, with one exception.....it is less onerous than the Federal law!

Obama and Holder are merely pandering for the hispanic vote for November.

Precisely. This transparent Onada gamet is simply intended to pander to the hispanic vote. If the lawsuit ever reaches the USSC it will be quashed. Admittedly by a 5-4 vote, but quashed none-the-less.

All Arizona is doing is enforcing the Federal statute. The reason it is doing it is that the Feds are not. It will be interesting, given the millions of illegals currently in the US, to see how The Marxist and his band of angry commies try to spin that in front of the five Constitutionalist judges.

Concurrent with the lawsuit Onada will attempt to deem the illegals legal so as to preempt the argument. Whatever outrageous tactic they pursue to do this also will be ruled unconstitutional at the end of the day.

The power end game for Onada, his commie buddies and the “useful idiots” is November. Even if they manage to retain both the Senate and House by a majority of one or two they are still check mated. Conservative pubbies will probably unseat enough RINOs to retake the GOP. Then they can orchestrate some serious interference to Onada’s agenda. Maby even with the help of some dems who see the handwriting on the wall as far as Onada and his plan to socialize America. Those on the demrat side who are not doctrinaire Marxists will resort to enlightened self intetrest to retain their cushy legislative jobs.