"Kenyan-born Obama..." (so they knew also?)

Well, we know we cannot expect CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC,
or even FOX to get to the bottom of this. They are all,
with the possible exception of FOX, in the tank for this guy.
It is disgusting - if this were G.W. Bush that was in question, we would be getting nightly reports on the news with updates (as Bulletins) frequently.
Even the Supreme Court is pathetic - -

I was very much around, alive, and alert in 2004, as I am to this day.

I saw obama’s famous speech at the Democrat Convention in 2004. I remember all the enthusiasm for obama as “the first black President” in 2004, whipped up by the press, many bigwigs in the Democrat party, and what passes for the intelligentsia. This is on the basis of that one speech, when obama was a lowly Illinois state senator with a very slim record of anything.

I remember people in our state (which is far away from Illinois) with “obama for Senate” bumper stickers on their cars in 2004. And I remember all the talk locally supporting obama as a Presidential candidate.

If it had been common knowledge in 2004 that obama had been born outside the United States, there would have been the degree of enthusiasm among Democrats for obama as President that one saw in some circles for Schwarzenegger as President—”it would be great, but he’s not eligible”. And opponents of an obama Presidency would have pointed out that he was ineligible, too.

Since no one said that about obama in 2004, it must not have been common knowledge that he was foreign-born. On the contrary, it was universally believed that obama had been born in the United States. (That is not to say that obama may be foreign-born, and that that fact had been covered up a long time before 2004, however.)

On July 6th, 2010, an ‘unopposed motion for extension to file opening brief’ was filed in the Keyes/Barnett v Obama lawsuit now in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in California. Appellants’ seek an extension until August 12th, 2010 to file the opening brief in the Keyes/Barnett v Obama appeal. The original schedule to file was June 28th, 2010. Previously, the Court granted Appellants’ an extension until July 12th, 2010, but due to serious complications from back surgery Attorney Gary Kreep is unable to meet that date. The motion was filed by Attorney Christopher P. Tucker. Below is an excerpt, regarding Attorney Kreep, from the motion filed yesterday, July 6th, 2010. The full motion embedded below excerpt.
More at:

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/07/eligibility-attorney-gary-kreep-placed.html

Has it occurred to you that the original AP article read the same and it was altered?

It occurred to me. But which scenario sounds more probable?

1) A 2004 Associated Press release referred to Obama as "Kenyan-born" in its opening. Multiple newspapers around the world ran versions of the AP article. Years later, the Associated Press decided to participate in a cover-up, and deleted the reference not only from its own archives, but also from Lexis and from every other newspaper archive in the world. (That includes scrubbing digital, microfiche, and physical records.) However, the conspiracy slipped up, and failed to remove the reference in, coincidentally, a single Kenyan newspaper.

or:

2) The Kenyan newspaper added the reference, and made a mistake.

Lessee...massive and sweeping conspiracy and cover-up involving lots of people and the manipulation of hundreds of archives, or single foreign newspaper fact-checking error?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.