Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Drango; SunkenCiv; Clintonfatigued; theothercheek; fieldmarshaldj; Just A Nobody; jazusamo; ...
Rothenberg is really a Democrat who bills himself as “non-partisan.” So I'd say that his prediction that the GOP “has a legitimate shot at taking back the House” can be translated into something like “the GOP would win back the House if the election were held today.” I'm sure it hurts him to say that.
32 posted on 07/07/2010 4:23:54 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: justiceseeker93

Thanks for the ping!


36 posted on 07/07/2010 10:45:33 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: justiceseeker93; Drango; MBB1984; Clintonfatigued; randita; AuH2ORepublican; darkangel82; ...

Rothenberg isn’t a bad analyst. Most of them appear to me to be a little too favorable to the rats. (Their wishful thinking hopefully rather than mine).

I think the House will turn. I wouldn’t be shocked if more seats are netted than in 1994 or 1946.

The Senate is interesting. The GOP is sure to come close but getting over the top will require some good fortune in the tossup races. It’s not uncommon for most of the close races to break to one party. In 2000 and 1986 the rats won most close races.


38 posted on 07/08/2010 2:01:28 AM PDT by Impy (DROP. OUT. MARK. KIRK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson