Congress: Arrest Mr. Obama

ATLAH Media Network ^ | 07/07/10 | ATLAH Ministries

[ATLAHWorldwide]

Congress: Arrest Mr. Obama

Dr. James David Manning calls for Congress to arrest Mr. Obama. Recorded on 21 June 2010. http://atlah.org/atlahworldwide/?p=8723

[UglyinLA]

Hey Dr. Manning, havent you been keeping up. You cant arrest illegal aliens (except in Arizona.) and Barry Soetoro is avoiding AZ like the plague.

[1951Boomer]

And they can’t cry “Racism!” when he challenges the idiocy of this administration.

[2CAVTrooper]

“Bozo is President”

Ain’t my pres__ent. Never was, never will.

[Doc Savage]

I would find it hard to believe that if Ozero shot and killed Michelle that he WOULDN’T be arrested and jailed and tried and convicted and sentenced and serve the sentence. When asswipes like Ozero purposely DESTROY the United States he stands GUILTY in my eyes of a felony and should be arrested! Stat!

[omegadawn]

If a criminal manages to talk his way into a position as a police officer using fraud . Is he immediately arrested or must he be suspended and hearing be held to determined his egibility to be a Police office ? Would it make any difference if many people thought he was a real Police officer? Since obama is not and never can be a natural born citizen, he is not or never can be the President. obama is nothing more than a common criminal that managed to con his way into the office of the President. That makes him one hell of a great con-artist, but not the President.

[phockthis]

sfl

[calex59]

It doesn’t matter how you, or any birther, sees Bozo(BTW, I think he is ineligible also)the fact is the majority of the country believes him to be President, therefore he can, and should be, impeached. It will be easier to impeach him than to get him thrown out for being ineligible.

[calex59]

Once again, to you and others, what we see Bozo has doesn't count, we are in the minority. The majority of the country sees him as President, therefore he can be impeached. To say otherwise is simply ludicrous as I already pointed out.

You, and the other guy,(he knows who he is)need to take reading comprehension lessons BTW, I never said I support Bozo. I never even use his name when I comment about him, BUT he is considered to be the President by the majority of the people, and in absence of his long form BC to prove where he is born, any court cases will be thrown out. He is impeachable, period, and that was my point, something you and the other guy seemed to miss.

[omegadawn]

Actually , voiding a election is a very simple matter.
First a Quo Warranto is issued( a demand that he show proof that both his parents were U.S. citizens)
Second , the congress has to vote on the results of the Quo Warranto.

While obama is the worst “president” in history , being a bozo is not a impeachable crime. What would you impeach him on? We are a Constitutional Republic ,a nation of laws,not mob rule. It does not matter if 99.99% of the people voted for obama , according to our Constitution he is not the legal President.

[Eye of Unk]

We need 5 million people all armed with the proper paperwork and all individually demanding a citizens arrest to Obama.

I know that is a conservative figure but its a goal, encircle Washington like Apaches upon a western fort in the old west.

[patriot08]

On July 6th, 2010, an ‘unopposed motion for extension to file opening brief’ was filed in the Keyes/Barnett v Obama lawsuit now in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in California. Appellants’ seek an extension until August 12th, 2010 to file the opening brief in the Keyes/Barnett v Obama appeal. The original schedule to file was June 28th, 2010. Previously, the Court granted Appellants’ an extension until July 12th, 2010, but due to serious complications from back surgery Attorney Gary Kreep is unable to meet that date. The motion was filed by Attorney Christopher P. Tucker. Below is an excerpt, regarding Attorney Kreep, from the motion filed yesterday, July 6th, 2010. The full motion embedded below excerpt.
More at:

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/07/eligibility-attorney-gary-kreep-placed.html

.

[calex59]

He has committed several impeachable offenses. BTW, your method would only work if the court didn't dismiss the case. If I recall correctly this has been tried at least once and it didn't get to first base let alone result in the removal of Bozo the WH clown.

Not enforcing the immigration laws is an impeachable offense, it is illegal for him to not up hold them, taking over private companies and the student loans are also illegal and impeachable, dismissing a case on racial grounds is also impeachable.

The problem is we have a legislature that won't impeach him no matter what he does, not from lack of offenses from which to choose.

[omegadawn]

I don’t disagree with you on much of what you say , but My primary point is that I think it would be easier to prove obama is in violation of Article 2 then it would be to prove any impeachable offence. A person is either a natural born citizen or he is not . THE problem is that the A.G.(holder) is the one that has to issue the Quo Waranto(demand to show proof). All cases against obama have ben dismissed on standing.( they didn’t have a right to question obama’s egibility ). obama court cases has cost almost 2 million dollars so far just to make sure no one gets a Certified Copy of his birth certificate. He know that this is his weak link, anyone who gets a copy of his birth record has proof that he is not a Natural Born citizen. Of course all the proof in the world means nothing if congress will not enforce the law.

[Broker]

To OUST Obama from power will take a more RUTHLESS man.

[lucysmom]

If a person isn’t a natural born citizen they can’t be, and aren’t, president.

It is speculated, not proven or ruled on, that Obama doesn't qualify for the office of president.

How is it possible to impeach someone who isn’t president?

Impeach means to make an accusation against. To prove Obama illegally occupies the oval office he must first be impeached, the charges against him investigated, and if there is sufficient evidence to support the charge, tried in the Senate.

They would be instead a usurper,a traitor, or foreign enemy.

If you honor the Constitution and the rule of law, then you must uphold the Constitution by following the process it provides. We are not yet a banana republic.

In short, Obama is president until it is proven he doesn't qualify. This is pretty basic stuff; if you didn't get it in school, then you should have been informed during the Clinton impeachment when it was reported on and discussed ad nauseum.

[lucysmom]

First a Quo Warranto is issued( a demand that he show proof that both his parents were U.S. citizens)

If Obama senior was already married in Kenya then was his marriage to Obama's mother valid? If Obama's parents we're not legally married, then does Obama's father's citizenship have any bearing on his own citizenship?

[aruanan]

If Obama senior was already married in Kenya then was his marriage to Obama's mother valid? If Obama's parents we're not legally married, then does Obama's father's citizenship have any bearing on his own citizenship?

It's citizenship of the parents; whether or not they were married or divorced or never married or polygamists is pretty much irrelevant.

[wintertime]

This is pretty basic stuff; if you didn't get it in school,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Why the insult?

I have read the opinions of the lawyers here on Free Republic from both sides ( both the afterbirters and the defenders of the Constitution). Given the heated discussion and long posts sprinkled with links, I conclude that this isn't “basic” stuff. Anyone with minimal reading comprehension skills would understand this. ( My turn for an insult.)

So...During WWII, during the Battle of the Bulge, when Hitler dressed up his soldiers as military officers and sent them behind our lines, did that make these men American officers? **If** Obama is found through discovery, not to be a natural born citizen, ( or even a citizen at all) then he can dress himself up in the “uniform” of the White House, but that doesn't make him a president. There are those who disagree with you. Impeachment is reserved for valid presidents.

At this point, we must now agree to disagree.

[wintertime]

If Obama senior was already married in Kenya then was his marriage to Obama's mother valid? If Obama's parents we're not legally married, then does Obama's father's citizenship have any bearing on his own citizenship?

Gee! Isn't this was "basic" stuff? Why all the questions? Didn't you get the answers to all this "basic" stuff in school? ( Just wondering.)

[lucysmom]

I have read the opinions of the lawyers here on Free Republic from both sides ( both the afterbirters and the defenders of the Constitution). Given the heated discussion and long posts sprinkled with links, I conclude that this isn't “basic” stuff.

The definition of "natural born citizen" within the meaning of the Constitution may not be basic stuff in that there is some room for debate, but the process for removing a sitting president is clearly outlined in the Constitution.

Anyone with minimal reading comprehension skills would understand this. ( My turn for an insult.)

Apparently you don't.

So...During WWII, during the Battle of the Bulge, when Hitler dressed up his soldiers as military officers and sent them behind our lines, did that make these men American officers?

That isn't even remotely analogous.

**If** Obama is found through discovery, not to be a natural born citizen, ( or even a citizen at all) then he can dress himself up in the “uniform” of the White House, but that doesn't make him a president. There are those who disagree with you. Impeachment is reserved for valid presidents.

Obama was elected by a comfortable margin. The electoral vote was duly cast and accepted by none other than Cheney without a peep, and Chief Justice Roberts administered the oath. That's what makes him president and worthy of impeachment.

How are you going to get "discovery"?