Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chatter Rises On Iran Strike
DOD Buzz ^ | 7/7/2010 | Colin Clark

Posted on 07/07/2010 10:12:20 PM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
Thanks sonofstrangelove.
When the McChrystal fracas broke out, several senior retired and current military officers worried quietly that moving leaders at Central Command at such a sensitive time in Israeli-Iranian relations could leave the U.S. unfocused on a likely Israeli threat. The selection and rapid confirmation of Gen. David Petraeus alleviated some of those concerns but CentCom remains without a leader who has undergone Senate confirmation. While that may seem academic to many, Senate confirmation confers great credibility on a military leader and grants them wider discretion than an acting commander possesses, both in their own minds and in those of Congress and the executive branch.

21 posted on 07/08/2010 7:43:32 AM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ARepublicanForAllReasons

*I know the idea of Israel cleaning Iran’s clock looks good to some from half a world away. But consider the secondary consequences, even supposing Israel does a first-rate job of taking out Iran’s nukes, ICBM’s, etc.*

The risks of the collateral damage you speak of would just increase as time goes by. There is no way to degrade Hizballah without war.


22 posted on 07/08/2010 12:29:22 PM PDT by j-damn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: Yehuda; j-damn
You are both right. I didn't mean to wave the 'give peace a chance' banner. I am a realist, and like I said -- I knew long ago that Iran
1) would develop nuclear weapons, and
2) use them at the first opportunity against Israel

I only mean to point out that it won't be a cakewalk, with Iran in control of Hizbollah and ?who knows how many sleeper cells? all over the world, including right here. It will be WWIII, in all probability. Interesting times, like the Chinese say.

24 posted on 07/08/2010 4:58:37 PM PDT by ARepublicanForAllReasons (Darn, lost my tagline... something about boarders, in-laws and bad language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

I’ll believe it when I wake up and hear that it’s been carried out. Until then, I take the view that either (a) Obuttocks doesn’t have the courage to actually carry it out, and is just trying to bluff Iran (as if that has ever worked), or (b) it’ll go down about as well as the last time a democrat president attacked Iran - and will say a little prospective prayer for the lives of the US service-members who will be slain at the altar of Obuttocks’ overweaning ego.


25 posted on 07/08/2010 5:03:00 PM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson