Skip to comments.
New Black Panther Chief Malik Shabazz Explains The ‘Kill White Babies’ Comment”
media ite ^
| 7/8/10
| Tommy Christopher
Posted on 07/08/2010 2:44:32 PM PDT by Nachum
[oreilly] As Steve Krakauer notes, this week is the New Black Panthers regularly scheduled moment in the sun. The organization has been trotted out by the right several times, always with a seemingly common objective: to create a creeping Black Menace, and conflate it with Barack Obamas America.
Bill OReilly and Andrew Breitbart have been promoting a very disturbing clip of King Samir Shabazz, the man charged with wielding a nightstick at a Philadelphia polling place, advocating the killing of white babies. In part 2 of my interview with NBPP Chairman Malik Zulu Shabazz, he gives a nearly-as-disturbing explanation, while also correcting the record.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: black; chief; panther; shabazz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
07/08/2010 2:44:38 PM PDT
by
Nachum
To: Nachum
New Black Panther Chief Malik Shabazz Explains The Kill White Babies CommentI just meant the ugly ones... you know the gingers and sh*t..."
2
posted on
07/08/2010 2:48:07 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Nachum
Malik Shabazz has reportedly visited the “White House” several times. Go figure.
3
posted on
07/08/2010 2:49:32 PM PDT
by
Apercu
("A man's character is his fate" - Heraclitus)
To: Nachum
The Medium is the Message.
US Dept. of Justice (Black Panther-DNC-SEIU Voter Enforcement Division):
At DOJ, we support these assaults at the voting booth.
Going forward, you may kill some white crackers.
You gonna have to kill some of their white babies, too.
4
posted on
07/08/2010 2:52:13 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(Article IV - Section 4 - The United States shall protect each of them against Invasion)
To: Nachum
As if there could conceivably be any acceptable reason to murder people based upon their race. This guy is a racist and should be denounced for it like all racists.
5
posted on
07/08/2010 2:56:23 PM PDT
by
highlander_UW
(The left proclaimed Obama as a Lightworker, but his work habit proclaims him to be a light worker)
To: Nachum
"The organization has been trotted out by the right several times, always with a seemingly common objective: to
create point out a creeping Black Menace."
Fixed it.
6
posted on
07/08/2010 2:58:18 PM PDT
by
MarineBrat
(Better dead than red!)
To: dead
>>you know the gingers and sh*t...” <<
Dead, I have yet to find a post of yours that should not have a liquid alert.
It wasn’t so bad with my old monitor but now since I have a wicked plasma monitor, cleaning the Diet Coke off is not as easy.
(((hugs)))
7
posted on
07/08/2010 3:00:00 PM PDT
by
netmilsmom
(I am inyenzi on the Religion Forum)
To: Nachum; Mr. Silverback; martin_fierro; Slings and Arrows; Allegra; Liz; maggief
Interviewer: "You don't believe in killing white babies, then?"
Shabazz: "Not in that context, no."
In.
[bleeping]
Credible.
To: Nachum
Holy Crap, this guy is saying that he WOULD kill white babies, just not announce it because it would keep him from doing it.
He won’t say it out loud, for the sake of this interview.
9
posted on
07/08/2010 3:05:20 PM PDT
by
netmilsmom
(I am inyenzi on the Religion Forum)
To: Nachum
Remember: it’s only “hate” when minorities don’t like it.
10
posted on
07/08/2010 3:05:54 PM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
To: Nachum
EXPLAIN WHAT, idiotShabazz?! CLARIFY WHAT, idiotShabazz?! I understand frakin' English quite fine, idiot. That racist bigot your defending spoke ENGLISH quite clearly and concisely.....I had NO problem in UNDERSTANDING it PLAINLY as spewed out! You bunch of racist bigots!!
11
posted on
07/08/2010 3:07:40 PM PDT
by
cranked
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
"Not in that context, no." He would have us believe that murderous hate speech could be nuanced.
To: Nachum
13
posted on
07/08/2010 3:10:36 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Nachum
14
posted on
07/08/2010 3:13:25 PM PDT
by
blam
To: Nachum
Here in Texas there is a saying that in fact has been used as a successful legal defense. The saying is “Some people just need killin’.”
IMO Shabazz Razamatazz NoGonadzz is a good candidate. And I believe he is a lawyer ... a twofer.
15
posted on
07/08/2010 3:16:05 PM PDT
by
ByteMercenary
(Healthcare Insurance is *NOT* a Constitutional right.)
To: Chode
16
posted on
07/08/2010 3:22:55 PM PDT
by
cbvanb
To: cbvanb
yup...
17
posted on
07/08/2010 3:38:03 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: cranked
Man your pissed! And rightly so. :>)
To: netmilsmom
Sweet of you to say that! I raise multiple toasts in your honor!
19
posted on
07/08/2010 6:26:21 PM PDT
by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Nachum
If white people were doing voter intimidation and talking about killing black babies it wouldn't be news either... right? Has the effing New York Times covered this story yet?
Would they cover it on the front page forever if the races positions were reversed?
I'm sure they have an excuse they believe - "we didn't cover it because..." and come up with crap every liberal elite will buy...
20
posted on
07/08/2010 6:44:48 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(Bull Conner reincarnated as black man "Eric Holder" approves racist "Panther" voter intimidation.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson