Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah PAC steps into the big leagues
Politico ^ | July 11, 2010 | Kenneth P. Vogel

Posted on 07/11/2010 7:14:49 PM PDT by Al B.

A new financial report filed Sunday evening showed Sarah Palin’s political action committee has taken its fundraising to a higher level – and suggests that she has begun building a more sophisticated political operation in place of a bare-bones organization powered mostly by her rock star status and scrappy on-line presence.

The report, filed with the Federal Election Commission, shows that Palin’s political action committee raised more money in the second quarter of this year – $866,000 – than it had in any previous three-month stretch since Palin formed the group in January 2009.

The committee, Sarah PAC, also spent nearly twice as much – $742,000 – as it had in any previous quarter, the lion’s share of which went to the type of list-building and fundraising (including its first major direct-mail campaign) that typically undergird top-tier political committees. It also reported its biggest-ever round of donations to candidates – $87,500 – and its highest outlays for travel costs, including $17,000 on private jet fare to crisscross the country for high-profile political speaking gigs, and speechwriting. It also showed continued payments for that speechwriting as well as foreign and domestic policy consulting, and its first ever payments to a scheduler.

In short, for the first time since the 2008 campaign when she was the vice-presidential running mate to GOP presidential candidate John McCain, Palin is supported by a political operation befitting someone considering a presidential run.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: graham; hatch; mclamesgirl; murkowski; palin; palin4amnesty; paulbots; paulbotshere; pimppaul; pimppaulshere; pimpromneyhere; pimpromneyplease; romneybots; romneybotshere; sarahpac; sarahpalin; scientology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last
To: rintense; rabscuttle385

In this case it was more than justified.

But go right ahead and defend the troll’s conduct in post #28. They’ve been put on notice that if they persists in their harassment of Rabs, that they will be banned.

Choose your allies carefully.


101 posted on 07/12/2010 2:49:42 PM PDT by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

So, you think if McCain wins, Palin supporters will be banned from this site? *chuckles*


102 posted on 07/12/2010 2:51:08 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
Palin already has the nominatiom if she runs..

Not even I would go that far.

103 posted on 07/12/2010 2:53:13 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
My dear, you've once again hit the heights of hypocrisy. Its OK if you do name calling, as its justified, in your opinion. Did it ever occur to you those you cry about for name calling might be thinking the same thing?

I swear for a bunch of 'defenders', I've never seen a bunch with thinner skin.

104 posted on 07/12/2010 2:55:15 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
They’ve been put on notice that if they persists in their harassment of Rabs, that they will be banned.

Oh? Can we expect the same notice for you as well? You are no saint, mk, so stop acting like a martyr.

105 posted on 07/12/2010 2:56:15 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: rintense

I have never threatened another poster by hinting at who their employer is, or what they do for a living, so until that happens, you can take your tongue clucking and go pound sand.


106 posted on 07/12/2010 3:01:45 PM PDT by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

You stay classy, mk.


107 posted on 07/12/2010 3:02:50 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: rintense

My responses are always proportional and appropriate, based on the content of the post I’m answering.

Yours is no exception.


108 posted on 07/12/2010 3:03:52 PM PDT by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

LOLZ! Thank you SO much for the laugh. I can go about my day with a big smile on my face.


109 posted on 07/12/2010 3:05:35 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: rintense

Bringing joy to your little corner of the universe is what I live for.


110 posted on 07/12/2010 3:07:08 PM PDT by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

Then you have succeeded! Have a beer on me! I’m off to walk the dogs.


111 posted on 07/12/2010 3:09:41 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: rintense; mkjessup

” So, you think if McCain wins, Palin supporters will be banned from this site? *chuckles* “

Oh no, just some. The real sleazy ones. The RINOS. Not you. You have a brain, and on occasion have been known to use it. You are also usually civil, as opposed to many of the others. Quite frankly, I can’t figure you out. You have brains, and often make good posts, yet you cannot see through Palin. You and Onyx puzzle me to no end.


112 posted on 07/12/2010 3:45:35 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our Troops, and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

I like to keep people guessing.


113 posted on 07/12/2010 4:52:48 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: rintense

If so, you won.


114 posted on 07/12/2010 4:56:19 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our Troops, and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

I have every intention of winning. :-P


115 posted on 07/12/2010 5:01:57 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Melas

That’s a joke. I just watched Sarah on Hannity. She did great.

I don’t see what you see. I was looking for a backward stupid hick and I didn’t see it in her eyes or hear it in her voice.

Do you realize who built this country ? Do you realize what made this country great ? And do you realize that this country is in deep trouble ?

I am with Outlaw woman. what you display is anti american and cowardly.


116 posted on 07/12/2010 6:28:55 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Melas
Obama vs Palin? I’d have a hard time convincing myself that there was any reason left to vote at all.

You would have a hard time.

117 posted on 07/12/2010 7:21:01 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Time for another purge!

The lies on this site are neck deep...


118 posted on 07/12/2010 7:37:01 PM PDT by Randy Larsen ( BTW, If I offend you! Please let me know, I may want to offend you again!(FR #1690))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

119 posted on 07/12/2010 7:42:19 PM PDT by bamahead (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: rintense

And remember; 100 to 1 is a “proportion,” so he can rationalize whatever he wants...


120 posted on 07/12/2010 7:43:12 PM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson