[ilgipper]

It all depends on who challenges him. A sitting President HAS to be beaten in the election, because they have any number of inherent advantages. Unless things absolutely collapse and he is truly run out of town, it all depends on who is running and how well they can out campaign the campaigner in chief.

[weps4ret]

Worked quite will for Jimmah Cahta, and Obambi make Jimmah look almost competent.

Gunner

[Psalm 144]

It all depends on who challenges him. A sitting President HAS to be beaten in the election, because they have any number of inherent advantages. Unless things absolutely collapse and he is truly run out of town, it all depends on who is running and how well they can out campaign the campaigner in chief.

****************************

True, true, true!

The GOP position of passively being less awful is not going to get them anywhere except extinct.

[TomGuy]

It all depends on who challenges him.

Absolutely.

If the Grand Old Party runs a retread candidate, they will lose, no matter how bad Obama is.

[lentulusgracchus]

Unless things absolutely collapse and he is truly run out of town, it all depends on who is running and how well they can out campaign the campaigner in chief.

Remember that the press muppets were telling us this same kind of crap all through 1979-80 when Carter was up for re-election. They tried to buffalo people just like they did in 2008, only then it was all about how dangerous a bumpkin, how much of a Hollywood nobody Ronald Reagan was.

He crushed Carter on Election Night, and I was out-of-my-gourd happy, but I was also amazed. I had had no idea Reagan was as strong as that -- all because of the b.s. job by the media slimes.

Here we go again. Go git 'em, Sarah!!